IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i1p2158244021999388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

M-Universities: Critical Sustainability Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Abide Coskun-Setirek
  • Zuhal Tanrikulu

Abstract

This study intends to investigate the factors which can affect the sustainability of mobile learning (m-learning) from many perspectives. Current studies on the sustainability of m-learning are reviewed in the context of organizational, financial, legal and ethical, pedagogical, assessment, psychological, and social factors. In addition to the literature review, an investigation based on formal interviews is conducted with 11 heads in university centers for distance education (UCDE) to obtain additional sustainability factors. To test the impacts of the factors on sustainability in m-learning, another investigation which bases on survey research is conducted with administrative personnel in UCDE, and instructors and students in the distance education universities. A total of 667 survey responses are analyzed, and a model for the sustainability of m-learning is developed. This article concludes that some factors have significant effects on sustainability in m-learning and some of them are critically important for m-learning initiatives. M-learning sustainability is studied rarely in some contexts such as organizational, psychological, and social context. Therefore, this study can bridge this gap, and provide a guideline to m-learning initiatives for sustainable education.

Suggested Citation

  • Abide Coskun-Setirek & Zuhal Tanrikulu, 2021. "M-Universities: Critical Sustainability Factors," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:2158244021999388
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244021999388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244021999388
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244021999388?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Md. Shahadat Hossain Khan & Benadjih Oiriddine Abdou & Jaana Kettunen & Sue Gregory, 2019. "A Phenomenographic Research Study of Students’ Conceptions of Mobile Learning: An Example From Higher Education," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.
    2. Manuel Alejandro Betancourt-Odio & Andresa Sartor-Harada & Oscar Ulloa-Guerra & Juliana Azevedo-Gomes, 2021. "Self-Perceptions on Digital Competences for M-Learning and Education Sustainability: A Study with Teachers from Different Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Baltar, Fabiola & Brunet Icart, Ignasi, 2012. "Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook," Nülan. Deposited Documents 1875, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    4. Jonathan Abramson & Maurice Dawson & Jeffery Stevens, 2015. "An Examination of the Prior Use of E-Learning Within an Extended Technology Acceptance Model and the Factors That Influence the Behavioral Intention of Users to Use M-Learning," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, December.
    5. Naji Shukri Alzaza & Abdul Razak Yaakub, 2011. "Students' Awareness and Requirements of Mobile Learning Services in the Higher Education Environment," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(1), pages 95-100, January.
    6. Jocelyn Wishart, 2009. "Ethical Considerations in Implementing Mobile Learning in the Workplace," International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), IGI Global, vol. 1(2), pages 76-92, April.
    7. Naim Ahmad & Noorulhasan Naveed Quadri & Mohamed Rafik N. Qureshi & Mohammad Mahtab Alam, 2018. "Relationship Modeling of Critical Success Factors for Enhancing Sustainability and Performance in E-Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Kassarjian, Harold H, 1977. "Content Analysis in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 4(1), pages 8-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed & Heena Choudhary & Naim Ahmad & Jarallah Alqahtani & Adel Ibrahim Qahmash, 2023. "Mobile Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Mahmood Al-Bashayreh & Dmaithan Almajali & Ahmad Altamimi & Ra’ed Masa’deh & Manaf Al-Okaily, 2022. "An Empirical Investigation of Reasons Influencing Student Acceptance and Rejection of Mobile Learning Apps Usage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed & Mohammad Mahtab Alam & Nasser Tairan, 2020. "Structural Equation Modeling for Mobile Learning Acceptance by University Students: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Daly, Bonita A. & Schuler, Drue K., 1998. "Redefining a certified public accounting firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(5-6), pages 549-567.
    3. Sirieix, Lucie & Lála, Jan & Kocmanová, Klára, 2017. "Understanding the antecedents of consumers' attitudes towards doggy bags in restaurants: Concern about food waste, culture, norms and emotions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 153-158.
    4. Chiara Mauri & Angelo Di Gregorio & Alice Mazzucchelli & Isabella Maggioni, 2017. "The employability of marketing graduates in the era of digitalisation and globalisation," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(4), pages 103-124.
    5. Smith, Andrew N. & Fischer, Eileen & Yongjian, Chen, 2012. "How Does Brand-related User-generated Content Differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter?," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 102-113.
    6. Alba Rocio Gutierrez Garzon & Pete Bettinger & Jacek Siry & Bin Mei & Jesse Abrams, 2019. "The Terms Foresters and Planners in the United States Use to Infer Sustainability in Forest Management Plans: A Survey Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Taran Loper & Victoria L. Crittenden, 2017. "Energy Security: Shaping The Consumer Decision Making Process In Emerging Economies," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 8(1).
    8. Sebastian Molinillo & Francisco Rejón-Guardia & Rafael Anaya-Sánchez, 2023. "Exploring the antecedents of customers’ willingness to use service robots in restaurants," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(1), pages 167-193, March.
    9. Aurélie Ringeval-Deluze & Louis César Ndione, 2021. "Meaning of packaging and innovation dynamics in a traditional luxury sector: the example of growers’ champagne [Signification des packagings et dynamiques d’innovation dans un secteur de luxe tradi," Post-Print hal-03266127, HAL.
    10. Bianca Polenzani & Chiara Riganelli & Andrea Marchini, 2020. "Sustainability Perception of Local Extra Virgin Olive Oil and Consumers’ Attitude: A New Italian Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    11. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special5:p:269-287 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Ki, Chung-Wha (Chloe) & Cuevas, Leslie M. & Chong, Sze Man & Lim, Heejin, 2020. "Influencer marketing: Social media influencers as human brands attaching to followers and yielding positive marketing results by fulfilling needs," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    13. Brandtjen, Roland, 2023. "In varietate concordia - United in diversity: An analyze of the EU environment according to its motto," IU Discussion Papers - Business & Management 6 (Oktober 2023), IU International University of Applied Sciences.
    14. Martin Berner & Jino Augustine & Alexander Maedche, 2016. "The Impact of Process Visibility on Process Performance," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 58(1), pages 31-42, February.
    15. Marcel Fratzscher, 2008. "Oral Interventions Versus Actual Interventions in Fx Markets – An Event‐Study Approach," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(530), pages 1079-1106, July.
    16. Zubcevic, Nives & Luxton, Sandra, 2011. "A comparison of print advertisements from Australia and Croatia," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 131-136.
    17. Tony Cooper & Constantino Stavros & Angela R. Dobele, 2019. "The levers of engagement: an exploration of governance in an online brand community," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(3), pages 240-254, May.
    18. Prentice, Catherine & Nguyen, Mai, 2021. "Robotic service quality – Scale development and validation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    19. Pullig, Chris & Maxham, James III & Hair, Joseph Jr., 2002. "Salesforce automation systems: an exploratory examination of organizational factors associated with effective implementation and salesforce productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 401-415, May.
    20. İpek, İlayda & Bıçakcıoğlu-Peynirci, Nilay, 2020. "Export market orientation: An integrative review and directions for future research," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4).
    21. Stefan Gold & Stefan Seuring & Philip Beske, 2010. "Sustainable supply chain management and inter‐organizational resources: a literature review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 230-245, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:2158244021999388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.