IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7725-d415659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality Management Practices of Food Manufacturers: A Comparative Study between Small, Medium and Large Companies in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Ng Kim-Soon

    (Faculty of Technology Management and Business, University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor 86400, Malaysia)

  • Salama A. Mostafa

    (Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor 86400, Malaysia)

  • Mohammad Nurunnabi

    (Business, Society and Environment Lab (BSE), College of Business Administration, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia)

  • Lim Hui Chin

    (Faculty of Technology Management and Business, University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor 86400, Malaysia)

  • Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar

    (School of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
    Sustainable Solutionz, T Nagar, Chennai 600017, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • Rabei Raad Ali

    (Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor 86400, Malaysia)

  • Umashankar Subramaniam

    (Renewable Energy Laboratory, College of Engineering, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Quality management (QM) has been intensively studied from the perspective of quality management practices (QMP) and market performance in the food manufacturing industry. However, in Asian countries, studies as regards to the sizes of food manufacturing companies are being neglected. Hence, this quantitative study investigates several aspects and focuses on the extent and level of QMP implementation among small, medium, and large food manufacturing companies in Malaysia. A survey questionnaire has been used to collect the data. In general, the results show that the components and types of QMP have the highest impact on large companies and medium companies than the smallest companies. It was found that QMP significantly related to the operational performance and market performance of the food manufacturing companies in Malaysia. Moreover, the verified QMP was particularly important to improve the effectiveness of resource control of small-sized and medium-sized enterprises. The outcome of this study serves as a framework to bring an understanding of QMP and promote continuous QM improvement means to the food manufacturing industries in Malaysia and other countries of the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Ng Kim-Soon & Salama A. Mostafa & Mohammad Nurunnabi & Lim Hui Chin & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Rabei Raad Ali & Umashankar Subramaniam, 2020. "Quality Management Practices of Food Manufacturers: A Comparative Study between Small, Medium and Large Companies in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7725-:d:415659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7725/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7725/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evangelos L. Psomas & Christos V. Fotopoulos, 2010. "Total quality management practices and results in food companies," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 59(7), pages 668-687, September.
    2. Wai Ming To & Billy T. W. Yu & Peter K. C. Lee, 2018. "How Quality Management System Components Lead to Improvement in Service Organizations: A System Practitioner Perspective," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bruna Maria Gerônimo & Giane Gonçalves Lenzi, 2023. "Maturity Models for Testing and Calibration Laboratories: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Nurul Najihah Azalanzazllay & Sarina Abdul Halim Lim & Ungku Fatimah Ungku Zainal Abidin & Cherrafi Anass, 2022. "Uncovering Readiness Factors Influencing the Lean Six Sigma Pre-Implementation Phase in the Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Noor Islam Jasim & Hairoladenan Kasim & Moamin A. Mahmoud, 2022. "Towards the Development of Smart and Sustainable Transportation System for Foodservice Industry: Modelling Factors Influencing Customer’s Intention to Adopt Drone Food Delivery (DFD) Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martínez-Zarzuelo, Angélica & Rodríguez-Mantilla, Jesús Miguel & Fernández-Díaz, María José, 2022. "Improvements in climate and satisfaction after implementing a quality management system in education," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Velthuis, Annet G.J. & Beek, Cees & Vriend, Hanneke & Bombeeck, Frank & Luning, Pieternel A. & Damman, Hans, 2012. "Role and Position of the Modern Quality Assurance Manager," 2012 International European Forum, February 13-17, 2012, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 144946, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    3. Obi Berko Obeng Damoah & Augustine Awuah Peprah, 2021. "Synthesis of small and medium enterprise research in Ghana," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 11(1), pages 451-468, December.
    4. Pantelis Sotirelis & Evangelos Grigoroudis, 2021. "Total Quality Management and Innovation: Linkages and Evidence from the Agro-food Industry," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 1553-1573, December.
    5. Escrig, Ana B. & de Menezes, Lilian M., 2015. "What characterizes leading companies within business excellence models? An analysis of “EFQM Recognized for Excellence” recipients in Spain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 362-375.
    6. Elena Lascu & Irina Severin & Florina Daniela Lascu & Razvan Adrian Gudana & Gabriela Nalbitoru & Nicoleta Daniela Ignat, 2021. "Framework on Performance Management in Automotive Industry: A Case Study," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Aawag Mohsen Alawag & Wesam Salah Alaloul & M. S. Liew & Abdullah O. Baarimah & Muhammad Ali Musarat & Al-Baraa Abdulrahman Al-Mekhlafi, 2023. "The Role of the Total-Quality-Management (TQM) Drivers in Overcoming the Challenges of Implementing TQM in Industrialized-Building-System (IBS) Projects in Malaysia: Experts’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Irene Schettini & Gabriele Palozzi & Antonio Chirico, 2020. "Enhancing Healthcare Decision-Making Process: Findings from Orthopaedic Field," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Florin Stîngă & Irina Severin & Ioana Alina Mitrache & Elena Lascu, 2020. "Redesign of the Curing Area of the Tire Manufacturing Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Luminita Popescu & Claudiu George Bocean & Anca Antoaneta Vărzaru & Costin Daniel Avram & Anica Iancu, 2022. "A Two-Stage SEM—Artificial Neural Network Analysis of the Engagement Impact on Employees’ Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Adam Sulich & Letycja Sołoducho-Pelc & Marcos Ferasso, 2021. "Management Styles and Decision-Making: Pro-Ecological Strategy Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7725-:d:415659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.