IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i3p21582440241271155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defining Quality in Higher Education and Identifying Opportunities for Improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Clemons
  • Marsha Jance

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide information that can benefit Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), which operate in a highly competitive environment. Understanding students’ perspectives regarding quality in higher education and areas of dissatisfaction can redirect an HEI’s strategy to address these concerns. The present study seeks to clarify how students define quality. A business student survey was conducted to understand students’ expectations, satisfaction, and dissatisfaction with their current educational environment. The analysis systematically explores students’ dissatisfaction by categorizing qualitative data using a modified version of the seven dimensions of service quality introduced by Evans and Lindsay.The level of detail provided in this report will assist in developing effective processes to improve student satisfaction at the university. The results conclude that improvements in completeness of the educational experience, both classroom and administrative services along with improvements in accessibility and convenience for academics and services will have the most impact on student satisfaction. Completeness addresses the quality of learning materials and services and accessibility and convenience address the ease of access to these learning materials and services. This paper expands upon the definition of quality in higher education, focusing on student dissatisfaction. The classification of student feedback provides a unique perspective. The limitations of the study include the response rate, area of study, geographic area, and learning modality. Tests of validity were not applied to the seven dimensions of service quality due to the exploratory nature of this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Clemons & Marsha Jance, 2024. "Defining Quality in Higher Education and Identifying Opportunities for Improvement," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241271155
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241271155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241271155
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241271155?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Lu & Chad Laux & Jiju Antony, 2017. "Lean Six Sigma leadership in higher education institutions," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 66(5), pages 638-650, June.
    2. Wai Ming To & Billy T. W. Yu & Peter K. C. Lee, 2018. "How Quality Management System Components Lead to Improvement in Service Organizations: A System Practitioner Perspective," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Lascu & Irina Severin & Florina Daniela Lascu & Razvan Adrian Gudana & Gabriela Nalbitoru & Nicoleta Daniela Ignat, 2021. "Framework on Performance Management in Automotive Industry: A Case Study," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Aawag Mohsen Alawag & Wesam Salah Alaloul & M. S. Liew & Abdullah O. Baarimah & Muhammad Ali Musarat & Al-Baraa Abdulrahman Al-Mekhlafi, 2023. "The Role of the Total-Quality-Management (TQM) Drivers in Overcoming the Challenges of Implementing TQM in Industrialized-Building-System (IBS) Projects in Malaysia: Experts’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Ng Kim-Soon & Salama A. Mostafa & Mohammad Nurunnabi & Lim Hui Chin & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Rabei Raad Ali & Umashankar Subramaniam, 2020. "Quality Management Practices of Food Manufacturers: A Comparative Study between Small, Medium and Large Companies in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Irene Schettini & Gabriele Palozzi & Antonio Chirico, 2020. "Enhancing Healthcare Decision-Making Process: Findings from Orthopaedic Field," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Andreas Kakouris & Eleni Sfakianaki & Marios Tsioufis, 2022. "Lean thinking in lean times for education," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 657-697, September.
    6. Shang Shanshan & Lyv Wenfei & Luo Lijuan, 2022. "Applying lean six sigma incorporated with big data analysis to curriculum system improvement in higher education institutions," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(2), pages 641-656, April.
    7. Teun Graafmans & Oktay Turetken & Hans Poppelaars & Dirk Fahland, 2021. "Process Mining for Six Sigma," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(3), pages 277-300, June.
    8. Martínez-Zarzuelo, Angélica & Rodríguez-Mantilla, Jesús Miguel & Fernández-Díaz, María José, 2022. "Improvements in climate and satisfaction after implementing a quality management system in education," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    9. Marco Maciel-Monteon & Jorge Limon-Romero & Carlos Gastelum-Acosta & Yolanda Baez-Lopez & Diego Tlapa & Manuel Iván Rodríguez Borbón, 2020. "Improvement project in higher education institutions: A BPEP-based model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Fabiane Letícia Lizarelli & Jiju Antony & José Carlos Toledo, 2020. "Statistical thinking and its impact on operational performance in manufacturing companies: an empirical study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(2), pages 923-950, December.
    11. Mahmoudi, Fahimeh & Bagheri Majd, Rouhollah, 2021. "The effect of lean culture on the reduction of academic corruption by the mediating role of positive organizational politics in higher education," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    12. Aleksandar Đorđević & Yury Klochkov & Slavko Arsovski & Nikola Stefanović & Luiza Shamina & Aleksandar Pavlović, 2021. "The Impact of ICT Support and the EFQM Criteria on Sustainable Business Excellence in Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.
    13. Florin Stîngă & Irina Severin & Ioana Alina Mitrache & Elena Lascu, 2020. "Redesign of the Curing Area of the Tire Manufacturing Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    14. Luminita Popescu & Claudiu George Bocean & Anca Antoaneta Vărzaru & Costin Daniel Avram & Anica Iancu, 2022. "A Two-Stage SEM—Artificial Neural Network Analysis of the Engagement Impact on Employees’ Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Lusia Permata Sari Hartanti & Ivan Gunawan & Ig. Jaka Mulyana & Herwinarso Herwinarso, 2022. "Identification of Waste Based on Lean Principles as the Way towards Sustainability of a Higher Education Institution: A Case Study from Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, April.
    16. Adam Sulich & Letycja Sołoducho-Pelc & Marcos Ferasso, 2021. "Management Styles and Decision-Making: Pro-Ecological Strategy Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241271155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.