IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i10p4224-d361201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value Analysis Model to Support the Building Design Process

Author

Listed:
  • Zulay Giménez

    (School of Engineering, Department of Construction Engineering and Management, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avda. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Macul, Santiago, Chile)

  • Claudio Mourgues

    (School of Engineering, Department of Construction Engineering and Management, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avda. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Macul, Santiago, Chile)

  • Luis F. Alarcón

    (School of Engineering, Department of Construction Engineering and Management, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avda. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Macul, Santiago, Chile)

  • Harrison Mesa

    (School of Civil Construction, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avda. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Macul, Santiago, Chile)

  • Eugenio Pellicer

    (School of Civil Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

The architecture, engineering, and construction industry requires methods that link the capture of customer requirements with the continuous measurement of the value generated and the identification of value losses in the design process. A value analysis model (VAM) is proposed to measure the value creation expected by customers and to identify value losses through indexes. As points of reference, the model takes the Kano model and target costing, which is used in the building project design process. The VAM was developed under the design science research methodology, which focuses on solving practical problems by producing outputs by iteration. The resulting VAM allowed the measurement and analysis of value through desired, potential, and generated value indexes, value loss identification, and percentages of value fulfillment concerning the design stage. The VAM permits the comparison of different projects, visualization of the evolution of value generation, and identification of value losses to be eradicated. The VAM encourages constant feedback and has potential to deliver higher value, as it enables the determination of parameters that add value for different stakeholders and informs designers where to direct resources and efforts to enhance vital variables and not trivial variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Zulay Giménez & Claudio Mourgues & Luis F. Alarcón & Harrison Mesa & Eugenio Pellicer, 2020. "Value Analysis Model to Support the Building Design Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4224-:d:361201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4224/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4224/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Menezes, Anna Carolina & Cripps, Andrew & Bouchlaghem, Dino & Buswell, Richard, 2012. "Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 355-364.
    2. Yuanyuan Yin & Shengfeng Qin & Ray Holland, 2011. "Development of a design performance measurement matrix for improving collaborative design during a design process," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 60(2), pages 152-184, January.
    3. Jacob R. Tucker & Annie R. Pearce & Richard D. Bruce & Andrew P. McCoy & Thomas H. Mills, 2012. "The perceived value of green professional credentials to credential holders in the US building design and construction community," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(11), pages 963-979, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mihaela-Elena Ulmeanu & Cristian-Vasile Doicin & Paulina Spânu, 2021. "Comparative Evaluation of Sustainable Framework in STEM Intensive Programs for Secondary and Tertiary Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-33, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Habtamu Tkubet Ebuy & Hind Bril El Haouzi & Riad Benelmir & Remi Pannequin, 2023. "Occupant Behavior Impact on Building Sustainability Performance: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Anti Hamburg & Targo Kalamees, 2018. "The Influence of Energy Renovation on the Change of Indoor Temperature and Energy Use," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Jakob Carlander & Bahram Moshfegh & Jan Akander & Fredrik Karlsson, 2020. "Effects on Energy Demand in an Office Building Considering Location, Orientation, Façade Design and Internal Heat Gains—A Parametric Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Alencastro, João & Fuertes, Alba & de Wilde, Pieter, 2018. "The relationship between quality defects and the thermal performance of buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 883-894.
    5. Prasanna, Ashreeta & Dorer, Viktor & Vetterli, Nadège, 2017. "Optimisation of a district energy system with a low temperature network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 632-648.
    6. Zhong, Shengyuan & Zhao, Jun & Li, Wenjia & Li, Hao & Deng, Shuai & Li, Yang & Hussain, Sajjad & Wang, Xiaoyuan & Zhu, Jiebei, 2021. "Quantitative analysis of information interaction in building energy systems based on mutual information," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    7. Eugene Mohareb & Arman Hashemi & Mehdi Shahrestani & Minna Sunikka-Blank, 2017. "Retrofit Planning for the Performance Gap: Results of a Workshop on Addressing Energy, Health and Comfort Needs in a Protected Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Pierryves Padey & Kyriaki Goulouti & Guy Wagner & Blaise Périsset & Sébastien Lasvaux, 2021. "Understanding the Reasons behind the Energy Performance Gap of an Energy-Efficient Building, through a Probabilistic Approach and On-Site Measurements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Gupta, Rajat & Kotopouleas, Alkis, 2018. "Magnitude and extent of building fabric thermal performance gap in UK low energy housing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 673-686.
    10. Wang, Lan & Lee, Eric W.M. & Hussian, Syed Asad & Yuen, Anthony Chun Yin & Feng, Wei, 2021. "Quantitative impact analysis of driving factors on annual residential building energy end-use combining machine learning and stochastic methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    11. De Boeck, L. & Verbeke, S. & Audenaert, A. & De Mesmaeker, L., 2015. "Improving the energy performance of residential buildings: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 960-975.
    12. Abdulazeez Rotimi & Ali Bahadori-Jahromi & Anastasia Mylona & Paulina Godfrey & Darren Cook, 2017. "Estimation and Validation of Energy Consumption in UK Existing Hotel Building Using Dynamic Simulation Software," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Li, Xinyi & Yao, Runming & Li, Qin & Ding, Yong & Li, Baizhan, 2018. "An object-oriented energy benchmark for the evaluation of the office building stock," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-11.
    14. Qadeer Ali & Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem & Fahim Ullah & Samad M. E. Sepasgozar, 2020. "The Performance Gap in Energy-Efficient Office Buildings: How the Occupants Can Help?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    15. Azar, Elie & Nikolopoulou, Christina & Papadopoulos, Sokratis, 2016. "Integrating and optimizing metrics of sustainable building performance using human-focused agent-based modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 926-937.
    16. Ji, Changyoon & Hong, Taehoon & Kim, Hakpyeong, 2022. "Statistical analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of South Korean residential buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    17. Naylor, Sophie & Gillott, Mark & Lau, Tom, 2018. "A review of occupant-centric building control strategies to reduce building energy use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 1-10.
    18. Lü, Xiaoshu & Lu, Tao & Kibert, Charles J. & Viljanen, Martti, 2014. "A novel dynamic modeling approach for predicting building energy performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 91-103.
    19. Zhao, Dong-Xue & He, Bao-Jie & Johnson, Christine & Mou, Ben, 2015. "Social problems of green buildings: From the humanistic needs to social acceptance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1594-1609.
    20. Małgorzata Szulgowska-Zgrzywa & Ewelina Stefanowicz & Krzysztof Piechurski & Agnieszka Chmielewska & Marek Kowalczyk, 2020. "Impact of Users’ Behavior and Real Weather Conditions on the Energy Consumption of Tenement Houses in Wroclaw, Poland: Energy Performance Gap Simulation Based on a Model Calibrated by Field Measuremen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4224-:d:361201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.