IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i11p3120-d236708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Long-term Sustainability of Lean as a Management Practice: Survey Evidence on Diffusion and Use of the Concept in Norway in the Period 2015–2017

Author

Listed:
  • Dag Øivind Madsen

    (Department of Business, Marketing and Law, School of Business, University of South-Eastern Norway, Bredalsveien 14, 3511 Hønefoss, Norway)

  • Terje Berg

    (NTNU Business School, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Klæbuveien 72, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Tonny Stenheim

    (Department of Business, Marketing and Law, School of Business, University of South-Eastern Norway, Bredalsveien 14, 3511 Hønefoss, Norway)

  • Janne Vagnild Moum

    (NTNU Business School, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Klæbuveien 72, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Inger Overland Bordewich

    (NTNU Business School, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Klæbuveien 72, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Maria Storsveen

    (School of Economics and Business, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Chr. Magnus Falsens vei 18, 1430 Ås, Norway)

Abstract

Even though Lean is a management concept with roots stretching back several decades, it did not take off on a large scale in Norway until around 2010. Since then, Lean has received frequent attention in the Norwegian media, and recent surveys indicate that the diffusion and popularity of Lean can be considered relatively high in both the private and public sectors. This article focuses on the sustainability of Lean as a management practice in Norway. The Google dictionary defines the term “sustainability” as “the ability to be maintained at a certain rate or level.” The article therefore seeks to examine the evolution in the diffusion and use of the Lean concept in Norway in the period 2015–2017. For this purpose, we draw on data from two surveys administered in 2015 and 2017, as well as a small number of follow-up interviews carried out in 2017. The results generally show that the diffusion rate in Norway appears to be relatively stable, and Lean users appear to have a very positive perception of the concept, which indicates that the Lean concept currently has an institutionalised position as a management practice in Norway. Therefore, the evolution pattern of Lean in Norway differs from what has been observed in other countries where the concept appears to be on a downward trajectory in terms of its popularity. Moreover, the results reveal considerable variation in terms of how Lean is interpreted, understood and used in practice, for instance, when it comes to abstraction levels and the use of different Lean-related principles and tools. Overall, the results have several theoretical and methodological implications for future studies on the diffusion, use and long-term sustainability of popular management concepts such as Lean.

Suggested Citation

  • Dag Øivind Madsen & Terje Berg & Tonny Stenheim & Janne Vagnild Moum & Inger Overland Bordewich & Maria Storsveen, 2019. "The Long-term Sustainability of Lean as a Management Practice: Survey Evidence on Diffusion and Use of the Concept in Norway in the Period 2015–2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:11:p:3120-:d:236708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/11/3120/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/11/3120/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dag Øivind Madsen & Maria Storsveen & Pål Klethagen & Tonny Stenheim, 2016. "The diffusion and popularity of Lean in Norway: An exploratory survey," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1258132-125, December.
    2. Scherrer-Rathje, Maike & Boyle, Todd A. & Deflorin, Patricia, 2009. "Lean, take two! Reflections from the second attempt at lean implementation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 79-88.
    3. Dag Øivind Madsen & Stig Risvik & Tonny Stenheim, 2017. "The diffusion of Lean in the Norwegian municipality sector: An exploratory survey," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1411067-141, January.
    4. Jiju Antony, 2011. "Six Sigma vs Lean," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 60(2), pages 185-190, January.
    5. Sanjay Bhasin, 2012. "Prominent obstacles to lean," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 61(4), pages 403-425, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carolina Cruz Villazón & Leonardo Sastoque Pinilla & José Ramón Otegi Olaso & Nerea Toledo Gandarias & Norberto López de Lacalle, 2020. "Identification of Key Performance Indicators in Project-Based Organisations through the Lean Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Assadej Vanichchinchai, 2019. "The Effect of Lean Manufacturing on a Supply Chain Relationship and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-15, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Secchi, Raffaele & Camuffo, Arnaldo, 2019. "Lean implementation failures: The role of organizational ambidexterity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 145-154.
    2. Logandran Naidoo & Ziska Fields, 2019. "Knowledge and Experience of Lean Thinking Amongst Senior Health Care Managers in Selected South African Public Hospitals," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 69(4), pages 21-37, October-D.
    3. Qing Huan & Niu ZhanWen, 2018. "Knowledge management in consultancy involved LPS implementation projects via social media," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 89-107, March.
    4. Fabiane Letícia Lizarelli & Jiju Antony & José Carlos Toledo, 2020. "Statistical thinking and its impact on operational performance in manufacturing companies: an empirical study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(2), pages 923-950, December.
    5. Abdulaziz M. Almutairi & Mohammed Almanei & Ahmed Al-Ashaab & Konstantinos Salonitis, 2021. "Prioritized Solutions for Overcoming Barriers When Implementing Lean in the Healthcare Supply Chain: A Saudi Perspective," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Miorando, Rogério & Marodin, Giuliano, 2017. "Lean supply chain management: Empirical research on practices, contexts and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 98-112.
    7. Rohit Kumar Singh & Sachin Modgil, 2023. "Assessment of Lean Supply Chain Practices in Indian Automotive Industry," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(1), pages 68-105, February.
    8. Alba Manresa & Andrea Bikfalvi & Alexandra Simon, 2021. "Investigating the impact of new technologies and organizational practices on operational performance: evidence from Spanish manufacturing companies," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(4), pages 1317-1327, December.
    9. Bortolotti, Thomas & Boscari, Stefania & Danese, Pamela, 2015. "Successful lean implementation: Organizational culture and soft lean practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 182-201.
    10. Maéva Jaffré & Eric Blanco & Pierre Chévrier & Bernard Penz, 2023. "Favoriser l’innovation par le lean product development : le comportement humain, un indicateur pertinent ?," Post-Print hal-04165613, HAL.
    11. García-Arca, Jesús & Prado-Prado, J. Carlos & González-Portela Garrido, A. Trinidad, 2020. "On-shelf availability and logistics rationalization. A participative methodology for supply chain improvement," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    12. Kai Sandner & Sebastian Sieber & Marleen Tellermann & Frank Walthes, 2020. "A Lean Six Sigma framework for the insurance industry: insights and lessons learned from a case study," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(5), pages 845-878, June.
    13. Alvin Baskoro Adhi & Fadhilah Muslim, 2023. "Development of Stakeholder Engagement Strategies to Improve Sustainable Construction Implementation Based on Lean Construction Principles in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, March.
    14. van Dun, Desirée H. & Hicks, Jeff N. & Wilderom, Celeste P.M., 2017. "Values and behaviors of effective lean managers: Mixed-methods exploratory research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 174-186.
    15. Dag Øivind Madsen & Stig Risvik & Tonny Stenheim, 2017. "The diffusion of Lean in the Norwegian municipality sector: An exploratory survey," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1411067-141, January.
    16. Lara Göhner & Luiz Carlos Brasil de Brito Mello & Renata Albergaria de Mello Bandeira, 2017. "Implementation Of Lean Manufacturing In Multinational Companies With Production Subsidiaries In Brazil: A Roadmap," Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa, vol. 22(2), pages 99-123.
    17. Malihe Manzouri & Mohd Nizam Ab-Rahman & Che Rosmawati Che Mohd Zain & Ezad Azraai Jamsari, 2014. "Increasing Production and Eliminating Waste through Lean Tools and Techniques for Halal Food Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-26, December.
    18. Andrea Signoretti & Silvia Sacchetti, 2020. "Lean HRM practices in work integration social enterprises: Moving towards social lean production. Evidence from Italian case studies," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(4), pages 545-563, December.
    19. Erceg Aleksandar & Dotlić Predrag & Mikuš Monika, 2018. "The 20 Keys Methodology – Continuous Improvement for Organizational Efficiency," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 63(1), pages 20-36, April.
    20. Marte D.-Q. Holmemo & Jonas A. Ingvaldsen, 2018. "Local adaption and central confusion: decentralized strategies for public service Lean implementation," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 13-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:11:p:3120-:d:236708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.