IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i7p2502-d158418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Community of Practice in Uganda’s Public Sector: Environmental Impact Assessment Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Giuseppe T. Cirella

    (Transport Economics, Faculty of Economics, University of Gdansk, 81-824 Sopot, Poland)

  • Felix O. Iyalomhe

    (Polo Centre of Sustainability, 18100 Imperia, Italy
    Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Kampala International University, Kampala, Uganda
    Department of Environmental Science and Natural Resource Management, National Open University of Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria)

  • Anne Jensen

    (Department of Environmental Sciences, Aarhus University, 4000 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Oluwole O. Akiyode

    (Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Kampala International University, Kampala, Uganda)

Abstract

The utilisation of typological concepts of participation-based research on the community of practice (CoP) examines Uganda’s public sector in relation to environmental impact assessment (EIA) of national projects. The re-assessment of participatory knowledge is analysed and incorporated into EIA project planning, design and implementation. A case study within the five divisions of the Kampala District used 250 semi-structured and open-ended survey questionnaires and 20 key informants by way of piecewise random sampling. The findings suggest that the majority of respondents were non-informed, on components of CoP, within the selected EIA projects. The CoP revealed concerns regarding Uganda’s security and corruption which intertwined on how the CoP was conducted. We provide original data on the CoP in relation to EIA projects with the intention of facilitating public sector entities a suitable level of knowledge in aiding affected communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuseppe T. Cirella & Felix O. Iyalomhe & Anne Jensen & Oluwole O. Akiyode, 2018. "Exploring Community of Practice in Uganda’s Public Sector: Environmental Impact Assessment Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2502-:d:158418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2502/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2502/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wen-der Yu & Pei-lun Chang & Shuen-Ho Yao & Shen-Jung Liu, 2009. "KVAM: model for measuring knowledge management performance of engineering community of practice," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(8), pages 733-747.
    2. Vivek Narain Mathur & Andrew Price & Simon Austin, 2008. "Conceptualizing stakeholder engagement in the context of sustainability and its assessment," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 601-609.
    3. Jennifer M. P. Stewart & A. John Sinclair, 2007. "Meaningful Public Participation In Environmental Assessment: Perspectives From Canadian Participants, Proponents, And Government," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(02), pages 161-183.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pili Masoud Kaku & Haochen Zhu & Fangnon Firmin Fangninou, 2023. "Evaluation of the EIA process in Zanzibar: the participation of stakeholders in public and private projects," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7461-7481, August.
    2. Paul O. Adekola & Giuseppe T. Cirella & Gracie Brownell, 2024. "Reintegration Programs and the Willingness of Displaced Persons to Return Home: Analyzing the Role of Social Infrastructure in North-East Nigeria," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1351-1380, September.
    3. Narges Banaeian & Morteza Zangeneh & Sean Clark, 2020. "Trends and Future Directions in Crop Energy Analyses: A Focus on Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, November.
    4. Giuseppe T. Cirella & Alessio Russo, 2019. "Special Issue Sustainable Interdisciplinarity: Human–Nature Relations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-5, December.
    5. Marin Kim & Yi Xie & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2019. "Sustainable Transformative Economy: Community-Based Ecotourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-15, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blesia, Jhon Urasti & Dixon, Keith & Lord, Beverley Rae, 2023. "Indigenous experiences and perspectives on a mining corporation's community relations and development activities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Watson, Rosina & Wilson, Hugh N. & Macdonald, Emma K., 2020. "Business-nonprofit engagement in sustainability-oriented innovation: What works for whom and why?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 87-98.
    3. Yustina Erti Pravitasmara Dewi & Dwi Yuwono Puji Sugiharto & Intiyas Utami & Andrian Huruta & Ocky Sundari, 2021. "Challenges of Top-Down Policy as Stakeholder Engagement Strategy in the Implementation of Internal Quality Assurance in Higher Education Institutions: An Empirical Research," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 24(1), pages 500-516, October.
    4. Umberto Berardi, 2013. "Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1573-1591, December.
    5. Lu Feng & Qiyi Cai & Yang Bai & Wenjie Liao, 2021. "China’s Wildlife Management Policy Framework: Preferences, Coordination and Optimization," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Leonardo Chiesi & Giuseppina Forte, 2022. "Design for Climate Change in the Neoliberal Present: Gentrification, Ecocide, and the Loss of Urbanity in New York City," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-25, October.
    7. Alan Paul Diduck & Andrew John Sinclair, 2016. "Small Hydro Development in the Indian Himalaya : Implications for Environmental Assessment Reform," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 1-24, June.
    8. Alamoush, Anas S. & Ballini, Fabio & Ölçer, Aykut I., 2024. "Management of stakeholders engaged in port energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Maria Giovanna Confetto & Maddalena Della Volpe & Claudia Covucci, 2018. "Dual marketers and sustainability communication. Empirical evidence from corporate websites," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 41-68.
    10. Nuno Videira & Rita Lopes & Paula Antunes & Rui Santos & José Luís Casanova, 2012. "Mapping Maritime Sustainability Issues with Stakeholder Groups," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 596-619, November.
    11. Arjan Kirkels & Vince Evers & Gerrit Muller, 2021. "Systems Engineering for the Energy Transition: Potential Contributions and Limitations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Anne Bridget Lane & Bree Devin, 2018. "Operationalizing Stakeholder Engagement in CSR: A Process Approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 267-280, May.
    13. Nadirah Hazwani Najib & Syuhaida Ismail & Rohayah Che Amat & Serdar Durdyev & Zdeňka Konečná & Abdoulmohammad Gholamzadeh Chofreh & Feybi Ariani Goni & Chitdrakantan Subramaniam & Jiří Jaromír Klemeš, 2022. "Stakeholders’ Impact Factors of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Sustainable Mixed Development Projects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Sala, Serenella & Ciuffo, Biagio & Nijkamp, Peter, 2015. "A systemic framework for sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 314-325.
    15. Jose Luis Retolaza & Ricardo Aguado & Leire Alcaniz, 2019. "Stakeholder Theory Through the Lenses of Catholic Social Thought," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(4), pages 969-980, July.
    16. Abosede Ijabadeniyi & Frank Vanclay, 2020. "Socially-Tolerated Practices in Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Reporting: Discourses, Displacement, and Impoverishment," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, January.
    17. Magda Sibley & Camilla Pezzica & Chris Tweed, 2021. "Eco-Hammam: The Complexity of Accelerating the Ecological Transition of a Key Social Heritage Sector in Morocco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-25, September.
    18. Francesca Torrieri & Marina Fumo & Michele Sarnataro & Gigliola Ausiello, 2019. "An Integrated Decision Support System for the Sustainable Reuse of the Former Monastery of “Ritiro del Carmine” in Campania Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, September.
    19. Michalis A. Vasiliades & Andreas Ch. Hadjichambis & Demetra Paraskeva-Hadjichambi & Anastasia Adamou & Yiannis Georgiou, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review on the Participation Aspects of Environmental and Nature-Based Citizen Science Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, July.
    20. Mohammad Bilal Shaukat & Khawaja Fawad Latif & Aymen Sajjad & Gabriel Eweje, 2022. "Revisiting the relationship between sustainable project management and project success: The moderating role of stakeholder engagement and team building," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 58-75, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2502-:d:158418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.