IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v25y2023i8d10.1007_s10668-022-02334-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the EIA process in Zanzibar: the participation of stakeholders in public and private projects

Author

Listed:
  • Pili Masoud Kaku

    (Tongji University
    Tongji University)

  • Haochen Zhu

    (Tongji University
    Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security
    Tongji University)

  • Fangnon Firmin Fangninou

    (Tongji University
    Tongji University)

Abstract

Stakeholder participation is expected to influence decision making toward project design and final environmental impact assessment (EIA) reports. Failure to address stakeholder concerns and satisfaction can significantly reduce the social and environmental impacts, resulting in project failures. This study aims to assess the relationship between participation and satisfaction of stakeholders in the EIA process through thirty selected public–private projects of Zanzibar Island. It employed the use of interviews with stakeholders, questionnaires, reports and consultations as instruments of data collection. The satisfaction of stakeholders was mean scored and then modeled using multilinear regression (MLR) and ordinal logistic regression (OLR). Results indicated that the majority of stakeholders (55%) were not involved in the EIA decision-making process. The local communities and NGOs have poor influence despite their very high interest in the EIA process, which justifies their limited public participation in the EIA stages. The overall satisfaction of stakeholder was basic. Their increase is influenced by the sufficient information and their involvement in the EIA. It would be recommendable to involve the stakeholders from the earliest stages of the EIA process and provide information and knowledge regarding the project development.

Suggested Citation

  • Pili Masoud Kaku & Haochen Zhu & Fangnon Firmin Fangninou, 2023. "Evaluation of the EIA process in Zanzibar: the participation of stakeholders in public and private projects," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7461-7481, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02334-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02334-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02334-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-022-02334-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Witold J. Henisz & Sinziana Dorobantu & Lite J. Nartey, 2014. "Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(12), pages 1727-1748, December.
    2. Jurian Edelenbos & Arwin Van Buuren & Dik Roth & Madelinde Winnubst, 2017. "Stakeholder initiatives in flood risk management: exploring the role and impact of bottom-up initiatives in three ‘Room for the River’ projects in the Netherlands," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(1), pages 47-66, January.
    3. Giuseppe T. Cirella & Felix O. Iyalomhe & Anne Jensen & Oluwole O. Akiyode, 2018. "Exploring Community of Practice in Uganda’s Public Sector: Environmental Impact Assessment Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Juan Palerm, 2000. "An Empirical-Theoretical Analysis Framework for Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 581-600.
    5. Mekuria, Wolde & Haileslassie, Amare & Tengberg, A. & Zazu, C., 2021. "Stakeholders interest and influence and their interactions in managing natural resources in Lake Hawassa Catchment, Ethiopia," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 17(1):87-10.
    6. Mei-Yung Leung & S. Thomas Ng & Sai-On Cheung, 2004. "Measuring construction project participant satisfaction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 319-331.
    7. Cheryl S.F. Chi & Jianhua Xu & Lan Xue, 2014. "Public participation in environmental impact assessment for public projects: a case of non-participation," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(9), pages 1422-1440, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Jiang & Aric Xu Wang & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Chuang Zhang, 2020. "Stakeholder Relationship Capability and Firm Innovation: A Contingent Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 111-125, November.
    2. Kamini Gupta & Donal Crilly & Thomas Greckhamer, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1869-1900, October.
    3. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    4. Buchanan, Sean & Marques, José Carlos, 2018. "How home country industry associations influence MNE international CSR practices: Evidence from the Canadian mining industry," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 63-74.
    5. Matthew Johnson & Friederike Redlbacher & Stefan Schaltegger, 2018. "Stakeholder Engagement for Corporate Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis of B2C and B2B Companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(4), pages 659-673, July.
    6. Müllner, Jakob & Puck, Jonas, 2018. "Towards a holistic framework of MNE–state bargaining: A formal model and case-based analysis," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 15-26.
    7. Johanna Olsson & Lotta Andersson, 2007. "Possibilities and problems with the use of models as a communication tool in water resource management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 21(1), pages 97-110, January.
    8. Shon R. Hiatt & Jake B. Grandy & Brandon H. Lee, 2015. "Organizational Responses to Public and Private Politics: An Analysis of Climate Change Activists and U.S. Oil and Gas Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1769-1786, December.
    9. Maya Finger & Mosi Rosenboim, 2022. "Going ESG: The Economic Value of Adopting an ESG Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Leonardo Becchetti & Emanuele Bobbio & Federico Prizia & Lorenzo Semplici, 2022. "Going Deeper into the S of ESG: A Relational Approach to the Definition of Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, August.
    11. Dodd, Olga & Frijns, Bart & Garel, Alexandre, 2022. "Cultural diversity among directors and corporate social responsibility," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    12. John Manso Frimpong & Jacob Kuutoume & Christiana Abrafi Gyamfi, 2024. "Supply Chain Integration and Organizational Resources and Capabilities: The Moderating Effect of Stakeholders’ Support," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 14(4), pages 72-82, July.
    13. Murod Aliyev & Timothy Devinney & Andrew Ferguson & Peter Lam, 2024. "Political discretion and risk: the Fukushima nuclear disaster, the distribution of global operations, and uranium company valuation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 33(3), pages 738-761.
    14. Vikraman R & Shulagna Sarkar & Vishnukumar K & Selvarasu A, 2021. "Leading Sustainable CSR Efforts: A Case of Sneha Opportunity School by NLCIL," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 14(1), pages 110-125, June.
    15. Xiaojun Du & Fei Feng & Wei Lv, 2022. "Bibliometric Overview of Organizational Legitimacy Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    16. Narges Banaeian & Morteza Zangeneh & Sean Clark, 2020. "Trends and Future Directions in Crop Energy Analyses: A Focus on Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, November.
    17. Lee, Junmin & Kim, Keungoui & Kim, Jiyong & Hwang, Junseok, 2022. "The relationship between shared mobility and regulation in South Korea: A system dynamics approach from the socio-technical transitions perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. A. John Sinclair & Wachiraporn Kumnerdpet & Joanne M. Moyer, 2013. "Learning sustainable water practices through participatory irrigation management in Thailand," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(1), pages 55-66, February.
    19. Runhui Lin & Yuan Gui & Zaiyang Xie & Lu Liu, 2019. "Green Governance and International Business Strategies of Emerging Economies’ Multinational Enterprises: A Multiple-Case Study of Chinese Firms in Pollution-Intensive Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-32, February.
    20. Jakob Müllner, 2017. "International project finance: review and implications for international finance and international business," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 97-133, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02334-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.