IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i4p1071-d139507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-Term Impacts of China’s New Commercial Harvest Exclusion Policy on Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity in the Temperate Forests of Northeast China

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Liu

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China)

  • Yu Liang

    (CAS Key Laboratory of Forest and Soil Ecology, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China)

  • Hong S. He

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA)

  • Wen J. Wang

    (Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China)

  • Chao Huang

    (CAS Key Laboratory of Forest and Soil Ecology, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China)

  • Shengwei Zong

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Lei Wang

    (Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China)

  • Jiangtao Xiao

    (Key Lab of Land Resources Evaluation and Monitoring in Southwest China, Ministry of Education, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610066, China)

  • Haibo Du

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

Abstract

Temperate forests in Northeast China have been severely exploited by timber harvesting in the last century. To reverse this trend, China implemented the Classified Forest Management policy in the Natural Forest Conservation Program in 1998 to protect forests from excessive harvesting. However, the policy was unable to meet the 2020 commitment of increasing growing stock (set in the Kyoto Protocol) because of high-intensity harvesting. Accordingly, China banned all commercial harvesting in Northeast China in 2014. In this study, we investigated the long-term impacts of the no commercial harvest (NCH) policy on ecosystem services and biodiversity using a forest landscape model, LANDIS PRO 7.0, in the temperate forests of the Small Khingan Mountains, Northeast China. We designed three management scenarios: The H scenario (the Classified Forest Management policy used in the past), the NCH scenario (the current Commercial Harvest Exclusion policy), and the LT scenario (mitigation management, i.e., light thinning). We compared total aboveground forest biomass, biomass by tree species, abundance of old-growth forests, and diversity of tree species and age class in three scenarios from 2010 to 2100. We found that compared with the H scenario, the NCH scenario increased aboveground forest biomass, abundance of old-growth forests, and biomass of most timber species over time; however, it decreased the biomass of rare and protected tree species and biodiversity. We found that the LT scenario increased the biomass of rare and protected tree species and biodiversity in comparison with the NCH scenario, while it maintained aboveground forest biomass and abundance of old-growth forests at a high level (slightly less than the NCH scenario). We concluded there was trade-off between carbon storage and biodiversity. We also concluded that light thinning treatment was able to regulate the trade-off and alleviate the negative effects associated with the NCH policy. Our results highlighted limitations of the NCH policy and provided new insights into sustainable forest management and the interdependence between human society and the forest ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Liu & Yu Liang & Hong S. He & Wen J. Wang & Chao Huang & Shengwei Zong & Lei Wang & Jiangtao Xiao & Haibo Du, 2018. "Long-Term Impacts of China’s New Commercial Harvest Exclusion Policy on Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity in the Temperate Forests of Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:1071-:d:139507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1071/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1071/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zanchi, Giuliana & Belyazid, Salim & Akselsson, Cecilia & Yu, Lin, 2014. "Modelling the effects of management intensification on multiple forest services: a Swedish case study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 284(C), pages 48-59.
    2. Heinonen, Tero & Pukkala, Timo & Mehtätalo, Lauri & Asikainen, Antti & Kangas, Jyrki & Peltola, Heli, 2017. "Scenario analyses for the effects of harvesting intensity on development of forest resources, timber supply, carbon balance and biodiversity of Finnish forestry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 80-98.
    3. Yimin Zhao, 2017. "Space as method," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 190-206, March.
    4. Christian Schleyer & Alexandra Lux & Marion Mehring & Christoph Görg, 2017. "Ecosystem Services as a Boundary Concept: Arguments from Social Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Liang, Yu & He, Hong S. & Wang, Wen J. & Fraser, Jacob S. & Wu, ZhiWei & Xu, Jiawei, 2015. "The site-scale processes affect species distribution predictions of forest landscape models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 300(C), pages 89-101.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siboyu Sun & Yude Geng, 2022. "Livelihood Resilience and Its Influencing Factors of Worker Households in the Face of State-Owned Forest Areas Reform in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Jianwei Bai & Lina Tang & Qingchun Wang & Fengri Li, 2018. "A Landscape-Scale Adjoining Conservation (LAC) Approach for Efficient Habitat Expansion: The Case of Changbai Mountain, Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-12, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Banaś & Stanisław Zięba & Leszek Bujoczek, 2018. "An Example of Uneven-Aged Forest Management for Sustainable Timber Harvesting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Yaxin Hou & Cao Wen & Hong Li & Yang Liu & Zhichao Fang & Yining Yang, 2020. "Some Second-Order σ Schemes Combined with an H 1 -Galerkin MFE Method for a Nonlinear Distributed-Order Sub-Diffusion Equation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Sampo Soimakallio & Tuomo Kalliokoski & Aleksi Lehtonen & Olli Salminen, 2021. "On the trade-offs and synergies between forest carbon sequestration and substitution," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Sattler, Claudia & Schröter, Barbara, 2022. "Collective action across boundaries: Collaborative network initiatives as boundary organizations to improve ecosystem services governance," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    5. Zhao, Zhihui & Li, Hong & Wang, Jing, 2021. "The study of a continuous Galerkin method for Sobolev equation with space-time variable coefficients," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 401(C).
    6. Zeug, Walther & Bezama, Alberto & Thrän, Daniela, 2020. "Towards a holistic and integrated Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of the bioeconomy: Background on concepts, visions and measurements," UFZ Discussion Papers 7/2020, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    7. Elias Hurmekoski & Tanja Myllyviita & Jyri Seppälä & Tero Heinonen & Antti Kilpeläinen & Timo Pukkala & Tuomas Mattila & Lauri Hetemäki & Antti Asikainen & Heli Peltola, 2020. "Impact of structural changes in wood‐using industries on net carbon emissions in Finland," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(4), pages 899-912, August.
    8. María D. López-Rodríguez & Javier Cabello & Hermelindo Castro & Jaime Rodríguez, 2019. "Social Learning for Facilitating Dialogue and Understanding of the Ecosystem Services Approach: Lessons from a Cross-Border Experience in the Alboran Marine Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Konsta Värri & Sanna Syri, 2019. "The Possible Role of Modular Nuclear Reactors in District Heating: Case Helsinki Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-24, June.
    10. Bakx, Tristan R.M. & Trubins, Renats & Eggers, Jeannette & Akselsson, Cecilia, 2023. "The effect of spatial and temporal planning scale on the trade-off between the financial value and carbon storage in production forests," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    11. Blattert, Clemens & Lemm, Renato & Thürig, Esther & Stadelmann, Golo & Brändli, Urs-Beat & Temperli, Christian, 2020. "Long-term impacts of increased timber harvests on ecosystem services and biodiversity: A scenario study based on national forest inventory data," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    12. Jeannette Eggers & Ylva Melin & Johanna Lundström & Dan Bergström & Karin Öhman, 2020. "Management Strategies for Wood Fuel Harvesting—Trade-Offs with Biodiversity and Forest Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    13. Lazaric, Nathalie & Toumi, Mira, 2022. "Reducing consumption of electricity: A field experiment in Monaco with boosts and goal setting," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    14. Li, Meng & Wei, Yifan & Niu, Binqian & Zhao, Yong-Liang, 2022. "Fast L2-1σ Galerkin FEMs for generalized nonlinear coupled Schrödinger equations with Caputo derivatives," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 416(C).
    15. Hurmekoski, Elias & Kunttu, Janni & Heinonen, Tero & Pukkala, Timo & Peltola, Heli, 2023. "Does expanding wood use in construction and textile markets contribute to climate change mitigation?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    16. Hanson, Helena I. & Wickenberg, Björn & Alkan Olsson, Johanna, 2020. "Working on the boundaries—How do science use and interpret the nature-based solution concept?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    17. Yu, Lin & Belyazid, Salim & Akselsson, Cecilia & van der Heijden, Gregory & Zanchi, Giuliana, 2016. "Storm disturbances in a Swedish forest—A case study comparing monitoring and modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 102-113.
    18. Sina Razzaghi Asl & Hamil Pearsall, 2022. "How Do Different Modes of Governance Support Ecosystem Services/Disservices in Small-Scale Urban Green Infrastructure? A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    19. Sagie, Hila & Orenstein, Daniel E., 2022. "Benefits of Stakeholder integration in an ecosystem services assessment of Mount Carmel Biosphere Reserve, Israel," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    20. Hao, Zhaopeng & Lin, Guang & Zhang, Zhongqiang, 2020. "Error estimates of a spectral Petrov–Galerkin method for two-sided fractional reaction–diffusion equations," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 374(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:1071-:d:139507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.