IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v284y2014icp48-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling the effects of management intensification on multiple forest services: a Swedish case study

Author

Listed:
  • Zanchi, Giuliana
  • Belyazid, Salim
  • Akselsson, Cecilia
  • Yu, Lin

Abstract

The study presents a method to evaluate the response of forest ecosystems to increased biomass extraction based on the integrated ecosystem model ForSAFE. It evaluates the effects of residue removal, intensification of thinnings and a shorter rotation period on a forest site in Southern Sweden. The evaluation includes multiple ecosystem indicators for productivity, carbon storage, wood production, water use and water quality. Such integrated assessments can contribute to identify negative or positive impacts affecting ecosystem services provided by forests. Results show that increased biomass extraction reduces the carbon stored in the forests, but at the same time reduces the loss of nitrogen and carbon through leaching. Within one rotation, residue removal affects the carbon stock in the soil, but it does not affect forest productivity and therefore tree carbon stock. Contrarily, the intensification of thinnings and shorter rotation periods reduce carbon stored in trees. In all cases, the amount of wood available for products increases, but the additional harvest from increased thinnings and earlier clear cutting does not compensate for the loss of carbon in trees. A positive consequence of removing the decomposing material from the site is the reduced amount of nutrients lost with runoff. Both leached nitrogen and dissolved organic carbon decrease with intensification. In addition, a positive effect of increased thinnings and a shorter rotation period is a reduced evapotranspiration, i.e. reduced water use. The effect on acidification differed depending on the time frame considered and the applied management scenario, due to different dominating processes regulating acidity. To avoid acidification, management intensification should include measures to prevent loss of base cations in the soil. Overall, under the studied conditions, the risk for negative effects seems to be smaller for residue extraction than for management changes including additional tree harvest.

Suggested Citation

  • Zanchi, Giuliana & Belyazid, Salim & Akselsson, Cecilia & Yu, Lin, 2014. "Modelling the effects of management intensification on multiple forest services: a Swedish case study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 284(C), pages 48-59.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:284:y:2014:i:c:p:48-59
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.04.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380014001872
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.04.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lars Gamfeldt & Tord Snäll & Robert Bagchi & Micael Jonsson & Lena Gustafsson & Petter Kjellander & María C. Ruiz-Jaen & Mats Fröberg & Johan Stendahl & Christopher D. Philipson & Grzegorz Mikusiński , 2013. "Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 1-8, June.
    2. Balland, Vincent & Pollacco, Joseph A.P. & Arp, Paul A., 2008. "Modeling soil hydraulic properties for a wide range of soil conditions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 300-316.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zanchi, Giuliana & Brady, Mark V., 2019. "Evaluating the contribution of forest ecosystem services to societal welfare through linking dynamic ecosystem modelling with economic valuation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    2. O’Donoghue, Cathal & O’Fatharta, Eoin & Geoghegan, Cathal & Ryan, Mary, 2024. "Farmland afforestation: Forest optimal rotation ages across discrete optimisation objectives," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    3. Yu, Lin & Zanchi, Giuliana & Akselsson, Cecilia & Wallander, Håkan & Belyazid, Salim, 2018. "Modeling the forest phosphorus nutrition in a southwestern Swedish forest site," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 369(C), pages 88-100.
    4. Olosutean Horea, 2015. "Methods for Modeling Ecosystem Services: A Review," Management of Sustainable Development, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 5-12, June.
    5. Lampa, Martin Erlandsson & Belyazid, Salim & Zanchi, Giuliana & Akselsson, Cecilia, 2019. "Effects of whole-tree harvesting on soil, soil water and tree growth – A dynamic modelling exercise in four long-term experiments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 414(C).
    6. Yu, Lin & Belyazid, Salim & Akselsson, Cecilia & van der Heijden, Gregory & Zanchi, Giuliana, 2016. "Storm disturbances in a Swedish forest—A case study comparing monitoring and modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 102-113.
    7. Kai Liu & Yu Liang & Hong S. He & Wen J. Wang & Chao Huang & Shengwei Zong & Lei Wang & Jiangtao Xiao & Haibo Du, 2018. "Long-Term Impacts of China’s New Commercial Harvest Exclusion Policy on Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity in the Temperate Forests of Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Bakx, Tristan R.M. & Trubins, Renats & Eggers, Jeannette & Akselsson, Cecilia, 2023. "The effect of spatial and temporal planning scale on the trade-off between the financial value and carbon storage in production forests," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    9. Blattert, Clemens & Lemm, Renato & Thürig, Esther & Stadelmann, Golo & Brändli, Urs-Beat & Temperli, Christian, 2020. "Long-term impacts of increased timber harvests on ecosystem services and biodiversity: A scenario study based on national forest inventory data," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    10. Jeannette Eggers & Ylva Melin & Johanna Lundström & Dan Bergström & Karin Öhman, 2020. "Management Strategies for Wood Fuel Harvesting—Trade-Offs with Biodiversity and Forest Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Etienne Lorang & Antonello Lobianco & Philippe Delacote, 2023. "Increasing Paper and Cardboard Recycling: Impacts on the Forest Sector and Carbon Emissions," Post-Print hal-04690101, HAL.
    2. Innangi, Michele & Balestrieri, Rosario & Danise, Tiziana & d’Alessandro, Francesco & Fioretto, Antonietta, 2019. "From soil to bird community: A Partial Least Squares approach to investigate a natural wooded area surrounded by urban patchwork (Astroni crater, southern Italy)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 394(C), pages 1-10.
    3. Paloma Ruiz-Benito & Jaime Madrigal-González & Sarah Young & Pierre Mercatoris & Liam Cavin & Tsurng-Juhn Huang & Jan-Chang Chen & Alistair S Jump, 2015. "Climatic Stress during Stand Development Alters the Sign and Magnitude of Age-Related Growth Responses in a Subtropical Mountain Pine," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Rachele Venanzi & Francesco Latterini & Walter Stefanoni & Damiano Tocci & Rodolfo Picchio, 2022. "Variations of Soil Physico-Chemical and Biological Features after Logging Using Two Different Ground-Based Extraction Methods in a Beech High Forest—A Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Jacqueline Loos & Henrik Von Wehrden, 2018. "Beyond Biodiversity Conservation: Land Sharing Constitutes Sustainable Agriculture in European Cultural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Morag F. Macpherson & Adam Kleczkowski & John R. Healey & Chris Quine & Nick Hanley, 2016. "The Effects of Invasive Pests and Diseases on Strategies for Forest Diversification," Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics 2016-11, University of St. Andrews, School of Geography and Sustainable Development.
    7. Mohamed Ali Mohamed, 2021. "An Assessment of Forest Cover Change and Its Driving Forces in the Syrian Coastal Region during a Period of Conflict, 2010 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-25, February.
    8. Chen, Si & Shahi, Chander & Chen, Han Y.H. & Kumar, Praveen & Ma, Zilong & McLaren, Brian, 2018. "Trade-offs and Synergies Between Economic Gains and Plant Diversity Across a Range of Management Alternatives in Boreal Forests," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 162-172.
    9. Zhufeng Hou & Guanghui Lv & Lamei Jiang, 2021. "Functional Diversity Can Predict Ecosystem Functions Better Than Dominant Species: The Case of Desert Plants in the Ebinur Lake Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-13, March.
    10. Kolo, Horst & Kindu, Mengistie & Knoke, Thomas, 2020. "Optimizing forest management for timber production, carbon sequestration and groundwater recharge," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    11. Susaeta, Andres & Gutiérrez, Ester & Lozano, Sebastián, 2023. "Profit-efficiency analysis of forest ecosystem services in the southeastern US," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Jutras, Marie-France & Nasr, Mina & Castonguay, Mark & Pit, Christopher & Pomeroy, Joseph H. & Smith, Todd P. & Zhang, Cheng-fu & Ritchie, Charles D. & Meng, Fan-Rui & Clair, Thomas A. & Arp, Paul A., 2011. "Dissolved organic carbon concentrations and fluxes in forest catchments and streams: DOC-3 model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2291-2313.
    13. De Leijster, Vincent & Santos, Maria João & Wassen, Martin J. & Ramos-Font, Maria Eugenia & Robles, Ana Belén & Díaz, Mario & Staal, Maartje & Verweij, Pita A., 2019. "Agroecological management improves ecosystem services in almond orchards within one year," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Yu, Lin & Belyazid, Salim & Akselsson, Cecilia & van der Heijden, Gregory & Zanchi, Giuliana, 2016. "Storm disturbances in a Swedish forest—A case study comparing monitoring and modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 102-113.
    15. Muhammad Nawaz Rajpar & Shahab Ali Khan & Allah Ditta & Hayssam M. Ali & Sami Ullah & Muhammad Ibrahim & Altaf Hussain Rajpar & Mohamed Zakaria & Mohamed Z. M. Salem, 2021. "Subtropical Broad-Leaved Urban Forests as the Foremost Dynamic and Complex Habitats for a Wide Range of Bird Species," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Suchocka, Marzena & Heciak, Jakub & Błaszczyk, Magdalena & Adamczyk, Joanna & Gaworski, Marek & Gawłowska, Agnieszka & Mojski, Jacek & Kalaji, Hazem M. & Kais, Karolina & Kosno-Jończy, Joanna & Heciak, 2023. "Comparison of Ecosystem Services and Replacement Value calculations performed for urban trees," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    17. Lampa, Martin Erlandsson & Belyazid, Salim & Zanchi, Giuliana & Akselsson, Cecilia, 2019. "Effects of whole-tree harvesting on soil, soil water and tree growth – A dynamic modelling exercise in four long-term experiments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 414(C).
    18. Heinonen, Tero & Pukkala, Timo & Mehtätalo, Lauri & Asikainen, Antti & Kangas, Jyrki & Peltola, Heli, 2017. "Scenario analyses for the effects of harvesting intensity on development of forest resources, timber supply, carbon balance and biodiversity of Finnish forestry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 80-98.
    19. Mulwa, Richard & Siikamaki, Juha & Ndwiga, Michael & Alvsilver, Jessica, 2022. "Influence of proximity to and type of foraging habitat on value of insect pollination in the tropics, with applications to Kenya," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 17(2), June.
    20. Engel, Markus & Vospernik, Sonja & Toïgo, Maude & Morin, Xavier & Tomao, Antonio & Trotta, Carlo & Steckel, Mathias & Barbati, Anna & Nothdurft, Arne & Pretzsch, Hans & del Rio, Miren & Skrzyszewski, , 2021. "Simulating the effects of thinning and species mixing on stands of oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl./Quercus robur L.) and pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) across Europe," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 442(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:284:y:2014:i:c:p:48-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.