IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i11p4282-d183896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Thinking for Sustainability: A Review of 10 Strategies for Sustainable Mobility by Bus for Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Gonzalo Fernandez-Sanchez

    (EMT de Madrid, 28007 Madrid, Spain)

  • Alvaro Fernandez-Heredia

    (EMT de Madrid, 28007 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

The sustainable mobility of the future comes about through sustainable ways of transport, such as walking, cycling, or collective transport. This includes the bus, the underground, and trains in big cities. This article reviews bus-related policies and initiatives worldwide. It also analyses ten cities looking at medium and long-term strategies for the urban bus service. The main ideas are: the forecasts for the use of the urban bus system indicate a significant increase in demand, therefore, there is a need for expanding the offered services; efforts to change the fleets towards Compressed Natural Gas and Electric vehicles; support of technological innovation for communication and accessibility; improving commercial speed and frequencies by infrastructure improvements, operation optimisation and technology; and, the link between these strategies and the air quality of cities. The transition towards a sustainable transport will happen based on the belief that the bus service is no longer the transport of the past or the present, but of the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Gonzalo Fernandez-Sanchez & Alvaro Fernandez-Heredia, 2018. "Strategic Thinking for Sustainability: A Review of 10 Strategies for Sustainable Mobility by Bus for Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4282-:d:183896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4282/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4282/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott Le Vine & John Polak, 2015. "Introduction to special issue: new directions in shared-mobility research," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 407-411, May.
    2. Dario Floreano & Robert J. Wood, 2015. "Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones," Nature, Nature, vol. 521(7553), pages 460-466, May.
    3. Daraio, Cinzia & Diana, Marco & Di Costa, Flavia & Leporelli, Claudio & Matteucci, Giorgio & Nastasi, Alberto, 2016. "Efficiency and effectiveness in the urban public transport sector: A critical review with directions for future research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 1-20.
    4. Hensher, David A., 2017. "Future bus transport contracts under a mobility as a service (MaaS) regime in the digital age: Are they likely to change?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 86-96.
    5. Currie, Graham & Rose, John, 2008. "Growing patronage - Challenges and what has been found to work," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 5-11, January.
    6. Corazza, Maria Vittoria & Guida, Umberto & Musso, Antonio & Tozzi, Michele, 2016. "A new generation of buses to support more sustainable urban transport policies: A path towards “greener” awareness among bus stakeholders in Europe," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 20-29.
    7. Macário, Rosário & Jara-Diaz, Sergio, 2008. "Growing patronage: Challenges and what has been found to work," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 12-15, January.
    8. Wan, Dan & Kamga, Camille & Liu, Jun & Sugiura, Aaron & Beaton, Eric B., 2016. "Rider perception of a “light” Bus Rapid Transit system - The New York City Select Bus Service," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 41-55.
    9. Currie, Graham & Wallis, Ian, 2008. "Effective ways to grow urban bus markets – a synthesis of evidence," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 419-429.
    10. Ehab I. Diab & Madhav G. Badami & Ahmed M. El-Geneidy, 2015. "Bus Transit Service Reliability and Improvement Strategies: Integrating the Perspectives of Passengers and Transit Agencies in North America," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 292-328, May.
    11. Ibarra-Rojas, O.J. & Delgado, F. & Giesen, R. & Muñoz, J.C., 2015. "Planning, operation, and control of bus transport systems: A literature review," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 38-75.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Blanca Victoria Zirufo-Briones & Norberto Pelegrín-Entenza, 2023. "Model for the Strategic Governance of the Integrated and Sustainable Local Development of the Portoviejo Canton in the Province of Manabí, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Dousková Nikol & Vomočil Ondřej & Novotný Vojtěch & Klinský Tomáš, 2023. "Effects of Queue Jump Lane on Public Transport: Case Study Using Microsimulation," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 239-250, January.
    3. Mateusz Szarata & Piotr Olszewski & Lesław Bichajło, 2021. "Simulation Study of Dynamic Bus Lane Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Maria Vittoria Corazza & Sandro Imbastaro & Marco Pascucci, 2020. "Regenerating Communities. New Life for a Local Railway: A Technological and Environmental Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-24, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manser, Patrick & Becker, Henrik & Hörl, Sebastian & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "Designing a large-scale public transport network using agent-based microsimulation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1-15.
    2. Marcin Jacek Kłos & Grzegorz Sierpiński, 2021. "Building a Model of Integration of Urban Sharing and Public Transport Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, March.
    3. Enoch, Marcus & Potter, Stephen, 2023. "MaaS (Mobility as a Service) market futures explored," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 31-40.
    4. Ling, Shuai & Jia, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng & Lan, Yanfei & Hu, Wandi, 2019. "An incentive mechanism design for bus subsidy based on the route service level," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 271-283.
    5. Hörcher, Daniel & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "A review of public transport economics," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    6. Preston, John, 2023. "All things must pass? Recent changes to competition and ownership in public transport in Great Britain," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Sheng, Dian & Meng, Qiang, 2020. "Public bus service contracting: A critical review and future research opportunities," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    8. Emily Grisé & Ahmed El-Geneidy, 2020. "Assessing operation and customer perception characteristics of high frequency local and limited-stop bus service in Vancouver, Canada," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 519-534, October.
    9. John HE Taplin & Yuchao Sun, 2020. "Optimizing bus stop locations for walking access: Stops-first design of a feeder route to enhance a residential plan," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(7), pages 1237-1259, September.
    10. Zhou, Yu & Meng, Qiang & Ong, Ghim Ping, 2022. "Electric Bus Charging Scheduling for a Single Public Transport Route Considering Nonlinear Charging Profile and Battery Degradation Effect," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 49-75.
    11. Xu, Zhandong & Xie, Jun & Liu, Xiaobo & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2020. "Hyperpath-based algorithms for the transit equilibrium assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    12. Avenali, Alessandro & Catalano, Giuseppe & D'Alfonso, Tiziana & Matteucci, Giorgio, 2020. "The allocation of national public resources in the Italian local public bus transport sector," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    13. Sánchez-Martínez, G.E. & Koutsopoulos, H.N. & Wilson, N.H.M., 2016. "Real-time holding control for high-frequency transit with dynamics," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-19.
    14. Benjamin Maas, 2022. "Literature Review of Mobility as a Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-28, July.
    15. Qian Li & Ting Tan & Benlong Wang & Zhimiao Yan, 2024. "Avian-inspired embodied perception in biohybrid flapping-wing robotics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Wang, Zhuowei & Yu, Jiangbo (Gabe) & Chen, Anthony & Fu, Xiaowen, 2024. "Subsidy policies towards zero-emission bus fleets: A systematic technical-economic analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 1-13.
    17. Wu, Weitiao & Liu, Ronghui & Jin, Wenzhou & Ma, Changxi, 2019. "Stochastic bus schedule coordination considering demand assignment and rerouting of passengers," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 275-303.
    18. Lopez-Carreiro, Iria & Monzon, Andres & Lopez-Lambas, Maria E., 2021. "Comparison of the willingness to adopt MaaS in Madrid (Spain) and Randstad (The Netherlands) metropolitan areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 275-294.
    19. Pangbourne, Kate & Mladenović, Miloš N. & Stead, Dominic & Milakis, Dimitris, 2020. "Questioning mobility as a service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 35-49.
    20. D’Alfonso, Tiziana & Jiang, Changmin & Bracaglia, Valentina, 2016. "Air transport and high-speed rail competition: Environmental implications and mitigation strategies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 261-276.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4282-:d:183896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.