IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v5y2022i2p30-520d829774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Goodness-of-Fit and Generalized Estimating Equation Methods for Ordinal Responses Based on the Stereotype Model

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Fernández

    (Serra Húnter Fellow, Department of Statistics and Operations Research (DEIO), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya · BarcelonaTech (UPC), 08028 Barcelona, Spain
    Institute of Mathematics of UPC-BarcelonaTech (IMTech), 08028 Barcelona, Spain
    Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental, CIBERSAM, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, 28029 Madrid, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Louise McMillan

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Victoria University of Wellington, Cotton Building 356, Gate 7, Kelburn Parade, Wellington 6012, New Zealand)

  • Richard Arnold

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Victoria University of Wellington, Cotton Building 356, Gate 7, Kelburn Parade, Wellington 6012, New Zealand)

  • Martin Spiess

    (Psychological Methods and Statistics, Hamburg University, 20146 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Ivy Liu

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Victoria University of Wellington, Cotton Building 356, Gate 7, Kelburn Parade, Wellington 6012, New Zealand)

Abstract

Background : Data with ordinal categories occur in many diverse areas, but methodologies for modeling ordinal data lag severely behind equivalent methodologies for continuous data. There are advantages to using a model specifically developed for ordinal data, such as making fewer assumptions and having greater power for inference. Methods : The ordered stereotype model (OSM) is an ordinal regression model that is more flexible than the popular proportional odds ordinal model. The primary benefit of the OSM is that it uses numeric encoding of the ordinal response categories without assuming the categories are equally-spaced. Results : This article summarizes two recent advances in the OSM: (1) three novel tests to assess goodness-of-fit; (2) a new Generalized Estimating Equations approach to estimate the model for longitudinal studies. These methods use the new spacing of the ordinal categories indicated by the estimated score parameters of the OSM. Conclusions : The recent advances presented can be applied to several fields. We illustrate their use with the well-known arthritis clinical trial dataset. These advances fill a gap in methodologies available for ordinal responses and may be useful for practitioners in many applied fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Fernández & Louise McMillan & Richard Arnold & Martin Spiess & Ivy Liu, 2022. "Goodness-of-Fit and Generalized Estimating Equation Methods for Ordinal Responses Based on the Stereotype Model," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:5:y:2022:i:2:p:30-520:d:829774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/5/2/30/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/5/2/30/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernández, D. & Arnold, R. & Pledger, S., 2016. "Mixture-based clustering for the ordered stereotype model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 46-75.
    2. Timothy Johnson, 2007. "Discrete Choice Models for Ordinal Response Variables: A Generalization of the Stereotype Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 489-504, December.
    3. Jaeil Ahn & Bhramar Mukherjee & Stephen B. Gruber & Samiran Sinha, 2011. "Missing Exposure Data in Stereotype Regression Model: Application to Matched Case–Control Study with Disease Subclassification," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 546-558, June.
    4. Archer, Kellie J. & Lemeshow, Stanley & Hosmer, David W., 2007. "Goodness-of-fit tests for logistic regression models when data are collected using a complex sampling design," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4450-4464, May.
    5. Liu, Dungang & Li, Shaobo & Yu, Yan & Moustaki, Irini, 2020. "Assessing partial association between ordinal variables: quantification, visualization, and hypothesis testing," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 105558, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Chun Li & Bryan E. Shepherd, 2012. "A new residual for ordinal outcomes," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 99(2), pages 473-480.
    7. Stuart R. Lipsitz & Garrett M. Fitzmaurice & Geert Molenberghs, 1996. "Goodness‐Of‐Fit Tests for Ordinal Response Regression Models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 45(2), pages 175-190, June.
    8. D. Fernández & S. Pledger, 2016. "Categorising Count Data into Ordinal Responses with Application to Ecological Communities," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(2), pages 348-362, June.
    9. Touloumis, Anestis, 2015. "R Package multgee: A Generalized Estimating Equations Solver for Multinomial Responses," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 64(i08).
    10. Mark Lunt, 2001. "Stereotype ordinal regression," Stata Technical Bulletin, StataCorp LP, vol. 10(61).
    11. Giovanni Nattino & Michael L. Pennell & Stanley Lemeshow, 2020. "Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer‐Lemeshow test," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 549-560, June.
    12. Anestis Touloumis & Alan Agresti & Maria Kateri, 2013. "GEE for Multinomial Responses Using a Local Odds Ratios Parameterization," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(3), pages 633-640, September.
    13. Kuss, Oliver, 2006. "On the estimation of the stereotype regression model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(8), pages 1877-1890, April.
    14. Ivy Liu & Alan Agresti, 2005. "The analysis of ordered categorical data: An overview and a survey of recent developments," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 14(1), pages 1-73, June.
    15. Giovanni Nattino & Michael L. Pennell & Stanley Lemeshow, 2020. "Rejoinder to “Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer‐Lemeshow test”," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 575-577, June.
    16. Rainer Göb & Christopher McCollin & Maria Ramalhoto, 2007. "Ordinal Methodology in the Analysis of Likert Scales," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(5), pages 601-626, October.
    17. Daniel Fernández & Ivy Liu & Roy Costilla & Peter Yongqi Gu, 2020. "Assigning scores for ordered categorical responses," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(7), pages 1261-1281, May.
    18. Werner Holtbrügge & Martin Schumacher, 1991. "A Comparison of Regression Models for the Analysis of Ordered Categorical Data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 40(2), pages 249-259, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yingliu Yang & Lianghai Jin, 2022. "Visualizing Temporal and Spatial Distribution Characteristic of Traffic Accidents in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kemmawadee Preedalikit & Daniel Fernández & Ivy Liu & Louise McMillan & Marta Nai Ruscone & Roy Costilla, 2024. "Row mixture-based clustering with covariates for ordinal responses," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(5), pages 2511-2555, July.
    2. Fernández, D. & Arnold, R. & Pledger, S., 2016. "Mixture-based clustering for the ordered stereotype model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 46-75.
    3. Stamatiadou, Valentini & Mazaris, Antonios & Mallios, Zisis & Katsanevakis, Stelios, 2023. "Valuation and mapping of the recreational diving ecosystem service of the Aegean Sea," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. Cornelius K. A. Pienaah & Roger Antabe & Godwin Arku & Isaac Luginaah, 2024. "Farmer field schools, climate action plans and climate change resilience among smallholder farmers in Northern Ghana," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(6), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Nooraee, Nazanin & Molenberghs, Geert & van den Heuvel, Edwin R., 2014. "GEE for longitudinal ordinal data: Comparing R-geepack, R-multgee, R-repolr, SAS-GENMOD, SPSS-GENLIN," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 70-83.
    6. Rui Liu & Feng Tan & Yaxuan Wang & Bo Ma & Ming Yuan & Lianxia Wang & Xin Zhao, 2022. "Machine Learning Identification of Saline-Alkali-Tolerant Japonica Rice Varieties Based on Raman Spectroscopy and Python Visual Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, July.
    7. Tatjana Miljkovic & Daniel Fernández, 2018. "On Two Mixture-Based Clustering Approaches Used in Modeling an Insurance Portfolio," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Timo Dimitriadis & Lutz Duembgen & Alexander Henzi & Marius Puke & Johanna Ziegel, 2022. "Honest calibration assessment for binary outcome predictions," Papers 2203.04065, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    9. Roy Costilla & Ivy Liu & Richard Arnold & Daniel Fernández, 2019. "Bayesian model-based clustering for longitudinal ordinal data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1015-1038, September.
    10. M. Kelemen & J. Danesh & E. Angelantonio & M. Inouye & J. O’Sullivan & L. Pennells & T. Roychowdhury & M. J. Sweeting & A. M. Wood & S. Harrison & L. G. Kim, 2024. "Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of polygenic risk score-stratified screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Kuss, Oliver, 2006. "On the estimation of the stereotype regression model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(8), pages 1877-1890, April.
    12. Daniel Fernández & Richard Arnold & Shirley Pledger & Ivy Liu & Roy Costilla, 2019. "Finite mixture biclustering of discrete type multivariate data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(1), pages 117-143, March.
    13. Zewei Lin & Dungang Liu, 2022. "Model diagnostics of discrete data regression: a unifying framework using functional residuals," Papers 2207.04299, arXiv.org.
    14. Domenico Piccolo & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "The class of cub models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 389-435, September.
    15. Baruch, Shmuel & Panayides, Marios & Venkataraman, Kumar, 2017. "Informed trading and price discovery before corporate events," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 561-588.
    16. S. A. Abu Bakar & Saralees Nadarajah & Z. A. Absl Kamarul Adzhar, 2018. "Loss modeling using Burr mixtures," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1503-1516, June.
    17. Eunae Jin & Woojong Lee & Danya Kim, 2018. "Does Resident Participation in an Urban Regeneration Project Improve Neighborhood Satisfaction: A Case Study of “Amichojang” in Busan, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, October.
    18. Keith Davis & Timothy Bell & Jacqueline Miller & Derek Misurski & Bela Bapat, 2011. "Hospital costs, length of stay and mortality associated with childhood, adolescent and young Adult meningococcal disease in the US," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 197-207, May.
    19. Jacques Muthusi & Samuel Mwalili & Peter Young, 2019. "%svy_logistic_regression: A generic SAS macro for simple and multiple logistic regression and creating quality publication-ready tables using survey or non-survey data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, September.
    20. Bambio, Yiriyibin & Bouayad Agha, Salima, 2018. "Land tenure security and investment: Does strength of land right really matter in rural Burkina Faso?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 130-147.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:5:y:2022:i:2:p:30-520:d:829774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.