IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v6y2018i2p57-d147107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Two Mixture-Based Clustering Approaches Used in Modeling an Insurance Portfolio

Author

Listed:
  • Tatjana Miljkovic

    (Department of Statistics, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA)

  • Daniel Fernández

    (Research and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, CIBERSAM, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona 08830, Spain
    School of Mathematics and Statistics, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6140, New Zealand)

Abstract

We review two complementary mixture-based clustering approaches for modeling unobserved heterogeneity in an insurance portfolio: the generalized linear mixed cluster-weighted model (CWM) and mixture-based clustering for an ordered stereotype model (OSM). The latter is for modeling of ordinal variables, and the former is for modeling losses as a function of mixed-type of covariates. The article extends the idea of mixture modeling to a multivariate classification for the purpose of testing unobserved heterogeneity in an insurance portfolio. The application of both methods is illustrated on a well-known French automobile portfolio, in which the model fitting is performed using the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. Our findings show that these mixture-based clustering methods can be used to further test unobserved heterogeneity in an insurance portfolio and as such may be considered in insurance pricing, underwriting, and risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatjana Miljkovic & Daniel Fernández, 2018. "On Two Mixture-Based Clustering Approaches Used in Modeling an Insurance Portfolio," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:57-:d:147107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/6/2/57/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/6/2/57/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernández, D. & Arnold, R. & Pledger, S., 2016. "Mixture-based clustering for the ordered stereotype model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 46-75.
    2. Bohning, Dankmar & Seidel, Wilfried & Alfo, Macro & Garel, Bernard & Patilea, Valentin & Walther, Gunther, 2007. "Advances in Mixture Models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(11), pages 5205-5210, July.
    3. Ivy Liu & Alan Agresti, 2005. "The analysis of ordered categorical data: An overview and a survey of recent developments," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 14(1), pages 1-73, June.
    4. Simon Lee & X. Lin, 2010. "Modeling and Evaluating Insurance Losses Via Mixtures of Erlang Distributions," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 107-130.
    5. Miljkovic, Tatjana & Grün, Bettina, 2016. "Modeling loss data using mixtures of distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 387-396.
    6. Bermúdez, Lluís & Karlis, Dimitris, 2012. "A finite mixture of bivariate Poisson regression models with an application to insurance ratemaking," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 3988-3999.
    7. Pledger, Shirley & Arnold, Richard, 2014. "Multivariate methods using mixtures: Correspondence analysis, scaling and pattern-detection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 241-261.
    8. Fraley C. & Raftery A.E., 2002. "Model-Based Clustering, Discriminant Analysis, and Density Estimation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 611-631, June.
    9. Brown, Garfield O. & Buckley, Winston S., 2015. "Experience rating with Poisson mixtures," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 304-321, September.
    10. Garrido, J. & Genest, C. & Schulz, J., 2016. "Generalized linear models for dependent frequency and severity of insurance claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 205-215.
    11. Salvatore Ingrassia & Antonio Punzo & Giorgio Vittadini & Simona Minotti, 2015. "The Generalized Linear Mixed Cluster-Weighted Model," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 32(1), pages 85-113, April.
    12. Michel Wedel & Wayne DeSarbo, 1995. "A mixture likelihood approach for generalized linear models," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 12(1), pages 21-55, March.
    13. Stephen Johnson, 1967. "Hierarchical clustering schemes," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 32(3), pages 241-254, September.
    14. Stuart Klugman & Jacques Rioux, 2006. "Toward a Unified Approach to Fitting Loss Models," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 63-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Delong, Łukasz & Lindholm, Mathias & Wüthrich, Mario V., 2021. "Gamma Mixture Density Networks and their application to modelling insurance claim amounts," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 240-261.
    2. Shi, Yue & Punzo, Antonio & Otneim, Håkon & Maruotti, Antonello, 2023. "Hidden semi-Markov models for rainfall-related insurance claims," Discussion Papers 2023/17, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    3. Mengyu Yu & Mazie Krehbiel & Samantha Thompson & Tatjana Miljkovic, 2020. "An exploration of gender gap using advanced data science tools: actuarial research community," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(2), pages 767-789, May.
    4. Verschuren, Robert Matthijs, 2022. "Frequency-severity experience rating based on latent Markovian risk profiles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 379-392.
    5. Počuča, Nikola & Jevtić, Petar & McNicholas, Paul D. & Miljkovic, Tatjana, 2020. "Modeling frequency and severity of claims with the zero-inflated generalized cluster-weighted models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 79-93.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Počuča, Nikola & Jevtić, Petar & McNicholas, Paul D. & Miljkovic, Tatjana, 2020. "Modeling frequency and severity of claims with the zero-inflated generalized cluster-weighted models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 79-93.
    2. Fernández, D. & Arnold, R. & Pledger, S., 2016. "Mixture-based clustering for the ordered stereotype model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 46-75.
    3. Delong, Łukasz & Lindholm, Mathias & Wüthrich, Mario V., 2021. "Gamma Mixture Density Networks and their application to modelling insurance claim amounts," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 240-261.
    4. Kemmawadee Preedalikit & Daniel Fernández & Ivy Liu & Louise McMillan & Marta Nai Ruscone & Roy Costilla, 2024. "Row mixture-based clustering with covariates for ordinal responses," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(5), pages 2511-2555, July.
    5. Daniel Fernández & Richard Arnold & Shirley Pledger & Ivy Liu & Roy Costilla, 2019. "Finite mixture biclustering of discrete type multivariate data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(1), pages 117-143, March.
    6. Blostein, Martin & Miljkovic, Tatjana, 2019. "On modeling left-truncated loss data using mixtures of distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 35-46.
    7. Daniel Fernández & Radim J. Sram & Miroslav Dostal & Anna Pastorkova & Hans Gmuender & Hyunok Choi, 2018. "Modeling Unobserved Heterogeneity in Susceptibility to Ambient Benzo[ a ]pyrene Concentration among Children with Allergic Asthma Using an Unsupervised Learning Algorithm," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Verschuren, Robert Matthijs, 2022. "Frequency-severity experience rating based on latent Markovian risk profiles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 379-392.
    9. Miljkovic, Tatjana & Grün, Bettina, 2016. "Modeling loss data using mixtures of distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 387-396.
    10. Eleni Matechou & Ivy Liu & Daniel Fernández & Miguel Farias & Bergljot Gjelsvik, 2016. "Biclustering Models for Two-Mode Ordinal Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(3), pages 611-624, September.
    11. Salvatore Ingrassia & Antonio Punzo, 2020. "Cluster Validation for Mixtures of Regressions via the Total Sum of Squares Decomposition," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 37(2), pages 526-547, July.
    12. Reynkens, Tom & Verbelen, Roel & Beirlant, Jan & Antonio, Katrien, 2017. "Modelling censored losses using splicing: A global fit strategy with mixed Erlang and extreme value distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 65-77.
    13. Michele Battisti & Filippo Belloc & Massimo Del Gatto, 2015. "Unbundling Technology Adoption and tfp at the Firm Level: Do Intangibles Matter?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 390-414, June.
    14. Martinez, M.J. & Lavergne, C. & Trottier, C., 2009. "A mixture model-based approach to the clustering of exponential repeated data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(9), pages 1938-1951, October.
    15. Gerhard Tutz & Micha Schneider & Maria Iannario & Domenico Piccolo, 2017. "Mixture models for ordinal responses to account for uncertainty of choice," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 11(2), pages 281-305, June.
    16. Christian Carmona & Luis Nieto-Barajas & Antonio Canale, 2019. "Model-based approach for household clustering with mixed scale variables," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(2), pages 559-583, June.
    17. repec:dgr:rugsom:96b34 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Mengyu Yu & Mazie Krehbiel & Samantha Thompson & Tatjana Miljkovic, 2020. "An exploration of gender gap using advanced data science tools: actuarial research community," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(2), pages 767-789, May.
    19. Jacques, Julien & Biernacki, Christophe, 2018. "Model-based co-clustering for ordinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 101-115.
    20. Bhati, Deepesh & Ravi, Sreenivasan, 2018. "On generalized log-Moyal distribution: A new heavy tailed size distribution," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 247-259.
    21. Roberto Mari & Salvatore Ingrassia & Antonio Punzo, 2023. "Local and Overall Deviance R-Squared Measures for Mixtures of Generalized Linear Models," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 40(2), pages 233-266, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:57-:d:147107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.