IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i7p1048-d865730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine Learning Identification of Saline-Alkali-Tolerant Japonica Rice Varieties Based on Raman Spectroscopy and Python Visual Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Liu

    (College of Agricultural Engineering, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163000, China)

  • Feng Tan

    (College of Electrical and Information, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163000, China)

  • Yaxuan Wang

    (College of Civil Engineering and Water Conservancy, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163000, China)

  • Bo Ma

    (Qiqihar Branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qiqihar 161006, China)

  • Ming Yuan

    (Qiqihar Branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qiqihar 161006, China)

  • Lianxia Wang

    (Qiqihar Branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qiqihar 161006, China)

  • Xin Zhao

    (College of Computer and Control Engineering, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar 161006, China)

Abstract

The core of saline-alkali land improvement is planting suitable plants. Planting rice in saline-alkali land can not only effectively improve saline-alkali soil, but also increase grain yield. However, traditional identification methods for saline-alkali-tolerant rice varieties require tedious and time-consuming field investigations based on growth indicators by rice breeders. In this study, the visualization method of Python data processing was used to analyze the Raman spectroscopy of japonica rice in order to study a simple and efficient identification method of saline-alkali-tolerant japonica rice varieties. Three saline-alkali-tolerant japonica varieties and three saline-alkali-sensitive japonica varieties were collected from control and saline-alkali-treated fields, respectively, and the Raman spectra of 432 samples were obtained. The data preprocessing stage used filtering-difference method to process Raman spectral data to complete interference reduction and crests extraction. In the feature selection stage, scipy.signal.find_peaks (SSFP), SelectKBest (SKB) and recursive feature elimination (RFE) were used for machine feature selection of spectral data. According to the feature dimension obtained by machine feature selection, dataset partitioning by K-fold CV, the typical linear logistic regression (LR) and typical nonlinear support vector machine (SVM) models were established for classification. Experimental results showed that the typical nonlinear SVM identification model based on both RFE machine feature selection and six-fold CV dataset partitioning had the best identification rate, which was 94%. Therefore, the SVM classification model proposed in this study could provide help in the intelligent identification of saline-alkali-tolerant japonica rice varieties.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Liu & Feng Tan & Yaxuan Wang & Bo Ma & Ming Yuan & Lianxia Wang & Xin Zhao, 2022. "Machine Learning Identification of Saline-Alkali-Tolerant Japonica Rice Varieties Based on Raman Spectroscopy and Python Visual Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:7:p:1048-:d:865730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/7/1048/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/7/1048/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanni Nattino & Michael L. Pennell & Stanley Lemeshow, 2020. "Rejoinder to “Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer‐Lemeshow test”," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 575-577, June.
    2. Liping Zhu, 2020. "Review of sparse sufficient dimension reduction: comment," Statistical Theory and Related Fields, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 134-134, July.
    3. Giovanni Nattino & Michael L. Pennell & Stanley Lemeshow, 2020. "Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer‐Lemeshow test," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 549-560, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stamatiadou, Valentini & Mazaris, Antonios & Mallios, Zisis & Katsanevakis, Stelios, 2023. "Valuation and mapping of the recreational diving ecosystem service of the Aegean Sea," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Cornelius K. A. Pienaah & Roger Antabe & Godwin Arku & Isaac Luginaah, 2024. "Farmer field schools, climate action plans and climate change resilience among smallholder farmers in Northern Ghana," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(6), pages 1-25, June.
    3. Timo Dimitriadis & Lutz Duembgen & Alexander Henzi & Marius Puke & Johanna Ziegel, 2022. "Honest calibration assessment for binary outcome predictions," Papers 2203.04065, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    4. M. Kelemen & J. Danesh & E. Angelantonio & M. Inouye & J. O’Sullivan & L. Pennells & T. Roychowdhury & M. J. Sweeting & A. M. Wood & S. Harrison & L. G. Kim, 2024. "Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of polygenic risk score-stratified screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Daniel Fernández & Louise McMillan & Richard Arnold & Martin Spiess & Ivy Liu, 2022. "Goodness-of-Fit and Generalized Estimating Equation Methods for Ordinal Responses Based on the Stereotype Model," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Zewei Lin & Dungang Liu, 2022. "Model diagnostics of discrete data regression: a unifying framework using functional residuals," Papers 2207.04299, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:7:p:1048-:d:865730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.