IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v13y2023i3p51-d1076752.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lessons Learned from the Colorado Project to Comprehensively Combat Human Trafficking

Author

Listed:
  • Annie Miller

    (School of Public Affairs, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO 80204, USA
    Laboratory to Combat Human Trafficking, Denver, CO 80205, USA)

  • Julie Laser

    (Laboratory to Combat Human Trafficking, Denver, CO 80205, USA
    Graduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80204, USA)

  • Annjanette Alejano-Steele

    (Laboratory to Combat Human Trafficking, Denver, CO 80205, USA
    Graduate Studies, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Denver, CO 80204, USA)

  • Kara Napolitano

    (Laboratory to Combat Human Trafficking, Denver, CO 80205, USA
    Graduate Studies, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Denver, CO 80204, USA)

  • Nevita George

    (Laboratory to Combat Human Trafficking, Denver, CO 80205, USA)

  • Natcha Connot

    (Laboratory to Combat Human Trafficking, Denver, CO 80205, USA
    Graduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80204, USA)

  • Amanda Finger

    (Laboratory to Combat Human Trafficking, Denver, CO 80205, USA)

Abstract

Countering human trafficking at a statewide level requires a combination of knowledge from lived experience, inter-sector collaborations, and evidence-based tools to measure progress. Since 2010, the nonprofit Laboratory to Combat Human Trafficking (LCHT) has collected and analyzed the data on how partners and organizations across the state work toward ending human trafficking. LCHT uses Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) to measure and illuminate promising paths toward ending human trafficking. Through CBPR, many collaborative working documents and activities have been created: Colorado Action Plans, Policy Recommendations, a Partnership Toolkit, and Partnership Convenings. This paper provides a single case study analysis of the Colorado Project, from 2013 through 2023, and offers a glimpse into the goals for the Colorado Project 2028. The ideas, strengths, and challenges presented here can guide other local efforts to support data-informed responses to trafficking. The CBPR methodology sheds light on the changes in Colorado’s anti-trafficking movement and the actions taken on behalf of partnerships (task forces and coalitions) across the state of Colorado. This paper offers a roadmap for collaborative design and decision-making among academic, nonprofit, and public sector partners seeking to conduct research on social movements utilizing a community-engaged process.

Suggested Citation

  • Annie Miller & Julie Laser & Annjanette Alejano-Steele & Kara Napolitano & Nevita George & Natcha Connot & Amanda Finger, 2023. "Lessons Learned from the Colorado Project to Comprehensively Combat Human Trafficking," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:51-:d:1076752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/3/51/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/3/51/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul R. Carlile, 2002. "A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 442-455, August.
    2. Mikesell, L. & Bromley, E. & Khodyakov, D., 2013. "Ethical community-engaged research: A literature review," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(12), pages 7-14.
    3. Wallerstein, N. & Duran, B., 2010. "Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: The intersection of science and practice to improve health equity," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(S1), pages 40-46.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kirsten Foot & Marcel Van der Watt & Elizabeth Shun-Ching Parks, 2023. "Special Issue “Frontiers in Organizing Processes: Collaborating against Human Trafficking/Modern Slavery for Impact and Sustainability”," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-3, April.
    2. Marcel Van der Watt, 2023. "Discouraging the Demand That Fosters Sex Trafficking: Collaboration through Augmented Intelligence," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goulding, Christina & Kelemen, Mihaela & Kiyomiya, Toru, 2018. "Community based response to the Japanese tsunami: A bottom-up approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 887-903.
    2. Meinel, Martin & Eismann, Tobias T. & Baccarella, Christian V. & Fixson, Sebastian K. & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2020. "Does applying design thinking result in better new product concepts than a traditional innovation approach? An experimental comparison study," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 661-671.
    3. Lotte Prevo & Stef Kremers & Maria Jansen, 2020. "Small Successes Make Big Wins: A Retrospective Case Study towards Community Engagement of Low-SES Families," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Michael Kaethler, 2019. "Curating creative communities of practice: the role of ambiguity," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Andersson, Ulf & Dasí, Àngels & Mudambi, Ram & Pedersen, Torben, 2016. "Technology, innovation and knowledge: The importance of ideas and international connectivity," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 153-162.
    6. Held, Suzanne & Hallett, John & Schure, Mark & Knows His Gun McCormick, Alma & Allen, Sarah & Milne-Price, Shauna & Trottier, Coleen & Bull Shows, Brianna & Other Medicine, Lucille & Inouye, Jillian, 2019. "Improving chronic illness self-management with the Apsáalooke Nation: Development of the Báa nnilah program," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    7. Yuchen Zhang & Wei Yang, 2022. "Breakthrough invention and problem complexity: Evidence from a quasi‐experiment," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 2510-2544, December.
    8. Mayer, Yael & Ilan, Rotem & Slone, Michelle & Lurie, Ido, 2020. "Relations between traumatic life events and mental health of Eritrean asylum-seeking mothers and their children's mental health," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    9. Daniele T. P. Souza & Eugenia A. Kuhn & Arjen E. J. Wals & Pedro R. Jacobi, 2020. "Learning in, with, and through the Territory: Territory-Based Learning as a Catalyst for Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Swan, Jacky & Goussevskaia, Anna & Newell, Sue & Robertson, Maxine & Bresnen, Mike & Obembe, Ademola, 2007. "Modes of organizing biomedical innovation in the UK and US and the role of integrative and relational capabilities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 529-547, May.
    11. Matthew Hawkins, 2018. "Researching and marketing to consumption collectives," Post-Print hal-01809954, HAL.
    12. Beth A. Bechky, 2006. "Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 3-21, February.
    13. Katrina G. Claw & Casey R. Dorr & Erica L. Woodahl, 2024. "Implementing community-engaged pharmacogenomics in Indigenous communities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-5, December.
    14. Marco Tortoriello & Ray Reagans & Bill McEvily, 2012. "Bridging the Knowledge Gap: The Influence of Strong Ties, Network Cohesion, and Network Range on the Transfer of Knowledge Between Organizational Units," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1024-1039, August.
    15. Maggie Chuoyan Dong & Yulin Fang & Detmar W. Straub, 2017. "The Impact of Institutional Distance on the Joint Performance of Collaborating Firms: The Role of Adaptive Interorganizational Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 309-331, June.
    16. Dana H. Z. Williamson & Sheryl Good & Daphne Wilson & Na’Taki Osborne Jelks & Dayna A. Johnson & Kelli A. Komro & Michelle C. Kegler, 2023. "Using the Collaborative Problem-Solving Model: Findings from an Evaluation of U.S. EPA’s Environmental Justice Academy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.
    17. Payam Sheikhattari & Emma Shaffer & Rifath Ara Alam Barsha & Gillian Beth Silver & Bethtrice Elliott & Christina Delgado & Paula Purviance & Valerie Odero-Marah & Yvonne Bronner, 2022. "Building Capacity for Community-Academia Research Partnerships by Establishing a Physical Infrastructure for Community Engagement: Morgan CARES," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Kaifeng Duan & Changcheng Zhang & Junqiang Li & Rui Zhang & Yanwei Zhang, 2020. "Boundary-Spanning Search for Knowledge, Knowledge Reconstruction and the Sustainable Innovation Ability of Agricultural Enterprises: A Chinese Perspective," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.
    19. Dean A. Shepherd & Jeffery S. Mcmullen & William Ocasio, 2017. "Is that an opportunity? An attention model of top managers' opportunity beliefs for strategic action," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 626-644, March.
    20. Meena Daivadanam & Maia Ingram & Kristi Sidney Annerstedt & Gary Parker & Kirsty Bobrow & Lisa Dolovich & Gillian Gould & Michaela Riddell & Rajesh Vedanthan & Jacqui Webster & Pilvikki Absetz & Helle, 2019. "The role of context in implementation research for non-communicable diseases: Answering the ‘how-to’ dilemma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:51-:d:1076752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.