IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v8y2019i8p236-d256348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Innovation in the Non-Profit Organization Framework: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Beatriz Blanco-Ariza

    (Facultad de Administración y Negocios, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia)

  • Alexis Messino-Soza

    (Facultad de Ingenierías, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia)

  • Ángel Wilhelm Vázquez-García

    (Departamento de Producción Económica, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana, 04960 Ciudad de México, Unidad Xochimilco, Mexico)

  • Enrique Melamed-Varela

    (Facultad de Administración y Negocios, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia)

Abstract

This article reviews the literature related to the concepts of social innovation and non-profit organizations, applying a bibliometric analysis to the last five years of publications in the Scopus platform and Web of Science. The results suggest that these concepts complement rather than exclude each other, as social innovation can add to the social value of this type of organization. The social commitment of non-profit organizations and its relevance to integrating an innovative approach in their management is also discussed as a way to confront social problems through innovation and promote more participation and development in the social sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Beatriz Blanco-Ariza & Alexis Messino-Soza & Ángel Wilhelm Vázquez-García & Enrique Melamed-Varela, 2019. "Social Innovation in the Non-Profit Organization Framework: A Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:8:p:236-:d:256348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/8/236/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/8/236/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joaquín Azagra-Caro & Davide Consoli, 2016. "Knowledge flows, the influence of national R&D structure and the moderating role of public–private cooperation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 152-172, February.
    2. Alvarado, Hernán & Rodríguez Herrera, Adolfo, 2008. "Claves de la innovación social en América Latina y el Caribe," Libros de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 2536 edited by Cepal, May.
    3. Sandra Miguel & Zaida Chinchilla-Rodriguez & Félix de Moya-Anegón, 2011. "Open access and Scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(6), pages 1130-1145, June.
    4. Alex Nicholls & Alex Murdock, 2012. "The Nature of Social Innovation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Alex Nicholls & Alex Murdock (ed.), Social Innovation, pages 1-30, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Gavin Melles, 2019. "Survey Study on Attitudes to Multi-Dimensional Sustainable Development with U.K. MSc Students," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheng-Wen Lee & Yi Tang Hu & San-Jung Peng & Hui-Hsin Hsu, 2022. "Discussions on Tax-Exemption of Taiwan’s Non-Profit Organizations Based on Diverse Perspectives," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 1-3.
    2. Nazaret Martínez-Heredia & Gracia González-Gijón & Andrés Soriano Díaz & Ana Amaro Agudo, 2021. "Dating Violence: A Bibliometric Review of the Literature in Web of Science and Scopus," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Solomon, David J. & Laakso, Mikael & Björk, Bo-Christer, 2013. "A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 642-650.
    2. Mara Del Baldo & Maria-Gabriella Baldarelli, 2017. "Renewing and improving the business model toward sustainability in theory and practice," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Equey, Catherine & Priftis, Athanasios & Trabichet, Jean-Philippe & Hutzli, Vanissla, 2024. "Designing a digital citizen-centered service," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    4. Teja Koler-Povh & Primož Južnič & Goran Turk, 2014. "Impact of open access on citation of scholarly publications in the field of civil engineering," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1033-1045, February.
    5. Sandra Miguel & Ely Francina Tannuri de Oliveira & Maria Cláudia Cabrini Grácio, 2016. "Scientific Production on Open Access: A Worldwide Bibliometric Analysis in the Academic and Scientific Context," Publications, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Giovanni Arturo López Isaza, 2014. "Innovación: lo social le es inmanente," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, vol. 0(2), pages 123-158, December.
    7. Rey de Marulanda, Nohra & Tancredi, Francisco, 2011. "Da inovaçao a política pública: historias de êxito na América Latina e no Caribe," Documentos de Proyectos 3908, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    8. Hajar Sotudeh & Zahra Ghasempour & Maryam Yaghtin, 2015. "The citation advantage of author-pays model: the case of Springer and Elsevier OA journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(2), pages 581-608, August.
    9. Alessandro Piperno & Christian Iaione & Luna Kappler, 2023. "Institutional Collective Actions for Culture and Heritage-Led Urban Regeneration: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Isabelle Dorsch, 2017. "Relative visibility of authors’ publications in different information services," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(2), pages 917-925, August.
    11. Daniel Alonso‐Martínez & Nuria González‐Álvarez & Mariano Nieto, 2019. "The influence of financial performance on corporate social innovation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 859-871, July.
    12. Cheng-Wen Lee & Yi Tang Hu & San-Jung Peng & Hui-Hsin Hsu, 2022. "Discussions on Tax-Exemption of Taiwan’s Non-Profit Organizations Based on Diverse Perspectives," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 1-3.
    13. Sergio Copiello, 2019. "The open access citation premium may depend on the openness and inclusiveness of the indexing database, but the relationship is controversial because it is ambiguous where the open access boundary lie," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(2), pages 995-1018, November.
    14. Valentina Cattivelli & Vincenzo Rusciano, 2020. "Social Innovation and Food Provisioning during Covid-19: The Case of Urban–Rural Initiatives in the Province of Naples," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Andrea Mervar & Maja Jokić, 2022. "Core-periphery nexus in the EU social sciences: bibliometric perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(10), pages 5793-5817, October.
    16. White, Leroy, 2018. "A Cook's tour: Towards a framework for measuring the social impact of social purpose organisations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 784-797.
    17. Ennas, Gianfranco & Di Guardo, Maria Chiara, 2015. "Features of top-rated gold open access journals: An analysis of the scopus database," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 79-89.
    18. Leckel, Anja & Veilleux, Sophie & Dana, Leo Paul, 2020. "Local Open Innovation: A means for public policy to increase collaboration for innovation in SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    19. Raul Oltra-Badenes & Vicente Guerola-Navarro & José-Antonio Gil-Gómez & Dolores Botella-Carrubi, 2023. "Design and Implementation of Teaching–Learning Activities Focused on Improving the Knowledge, the Awareness and the Perception of the Relationship between the SDGs and the Future Profession of Univers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    20. Jardon, Carlos M. & Gierhake, Klaus, 2017. "El conocimiento local como factor de innovación social: el caso del distrito municipal de Quito," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 38, pages 67-90.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:8:p:236-:d:256348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.