IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v7y2018i10p197-d175494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When in Rome, Feel as the Romans Feel: An Emotional Model of Organizational Socialization

Author

Listed:
  • Yongjun Choi

    (College of Business Administration, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Korea)

Abstract

Organizational socialization literature has long emphasized learning organizational culture upon entry. However, most previous socialization studies have largely focused on learning job skills, such as role clarity and task mastery. Focusing on emotional culture, the author provides a review about the roles of emotions in an organizational socialization context. Further, drawing upon the organizational socialization and emotion literature, the author builds a theoretical model, an emotional model of organizational socialization highlighting how newcomers adjust to the emotional culture within an organization, which ultimately leads to successful organizational socialization. This article provides new conceptual insights into the roles of newcomers’ adjustment to an emotional culture in a socialization context, providing fruitful ways for future empirical testing.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongjun Choi, 2018. "When in Rome, Feel as the Romans Feel: An Emotional Model of Organizational Socialization," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:10:p:197-:d:175494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/10/197/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/10/197/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seongwook Ha, 2018. "Surface Acting and Job-Related Affective Wellbeing: Preventing Resource Loss Spiral and Resource Loss Cycle for Sustainable Workplaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Stephen P. Borgatti & Rob Cross, 2003. "A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 432-445, April.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13769 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    5. Jeremy P. Birnholtz & Michael D. Cohen & Susannah V. Hoch, 2007. "Organizational Character: On the Regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 315-332, April.
    6. Linda Datcher Loury, 2006. "Some Contacts Are More Equal than Others: Informal Networks, Job Tenure, and Wages," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 24(2), pages 299-318, April.
    7. Serge Perrot & Talya Bauer & David Abonneau & Eric Campoy & Berrin Erdogan & Robert C. Liden, 2014. "Organizational Socialization Tactics and Newcomer Adjustment. The Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Support," Post-Print hal-01457293, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minkyung Kim & Elizabeth A. Williams, 2022. "Emotional Sustainability in Human Services Organizations: Cultural and Communicative Paths to Dealing with Emotional Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Ivana Načinović Braje & Ana Aleksić & Sanda Rašić Jelavić, 2020. "Blame It on Individual or Organization Environment: What Predicts Workplace Deviance More?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Mónica Fernanda Aranibar & Yolanda Baez-Lopez & Jorge Limon-Romero & María Concepción Ramírez-Barón & Blanca Rosa García Rivera & Melina Ortega-Pérez Tejada & Jacqueline Hernández Bejarano, 2022. "The Impact of Social Benefits on Work Commitment and Organizational Socialization in the Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Yongjun Choi & David J. Yoon & Dongkyu Kim, 2020. "Leader Behavioral Integrity and Employee In-Role Performance: The Roles of Coworker Support and Job Autonomy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-14, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harpreet Singh & David Kryscynski & Xinxin Li & Ram Gopal, 2016. "Pipes, pools, and filters: How collaboration networks affect innovative performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(8), pages 1649-1666, August.
    2. Claudio Vitari & Aurelio Ravarini & Bernard Fallery, 2006. "The Kms Recommending Experts In The Communities: Proposition Of A Theory On Their Success," Post-Print halshs-01924301, HAL.
    3. Roberto Grandinetti, 2022. "A Routine-Based Theory of Routine Replication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Lauring, Jakob & Selmer, Jan, 2013. "Diversity attitudes and group knowledge processing in multicultural organizations," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 124-136.
    5. Wang, Jian & Shibayama, Sotaro, 2022. "Mentorship and creativity: Effects of mentor creativity and mentoring style," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(3).
    6. Ioannidis, Evangelos & Varsakelis, Nikos & Antoniou, Ioannis, 2018. "Experts in Knowledge Networks: Central Positioning and Intelligent Selections," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 509(C), pages 890-905.
    7. Monia Castellini & Vincenzo Riso, 2020. "Risk Management and Management Control System, a close relationship in process: Isomorphism in the Italian Municipalities," Working Papers 2020039, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    8. Ana Aleksić Mirić & Biljana Bogićević Milikić & Nebojša Janićijević, 2020. "Organisational Learning In Serbia During The Transition: The Legacy Of Božidar Cerović And His Contribution To Transition Research," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 65(225), pages 73-104, April – J.
    9. Jeppesen, Lars Bo & Laursen, Keld, 2009. "The role of lead users in knowledge sharing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1582-1589, December.
    10. Berends, J.J. & Bij van der, J.D. & Debackere, K. & Weggeman, M.P.C.D., 2004. "Knowledge sharing mechanisms in industrial research," Working Papers 04.04, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    11. Linda Argote & Ella Miron-Spektor, 2011. "Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1123-1137, October.
    12. Sergey M. Vasin & Leyla A. Gamidullaeva & Nicholas Wise & Konstantin Yu. Korolev, 2020. "Knowledge Exchange and the Trust Institution: a New Look at the Problem," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(3), pages 1026-1042, September.
    13. Ha Minh Tri & Doan Bao Son, 2021. "Social capital and knowledge sharing in the public sector," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 11(1), pages 74-88.
    14. Claudio Vitari & Aurelio Ravarini, 2009. "The Effects Of Communities Of Practice On The Success Of An Expert Recommending Service," Post-Print hal-00463120, HAL.
    15. Lu, Jinfeng & Dimov, Dimo, 2023. "A system dynamics modelling of entrepreneurship and growth within firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3).
    16. Olunifesi Adekunle Suraj, 2016. "Managing Telecommunications for Development: An Analysis of Intellectual Capital in Nigerian Telecommunication Industry," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 1-30, March.
    17. Soufiane Mezzourh & Walid A Nakara, 2009. "Governance and innovation : A Knowledge-based approach [La gouvernance de l'innovation : une approche par la connaissance]," Post-Print halshs-01955966, HAL.
    18. M. Max Evans & Ilja Frissen & Anthony K. P. Wensley, 2018. "Organisational Information and Knowledge Sharing: Uncovering Mediating Effects of Perceived Trustworthiness Using the PROCESS Approach," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-29, March.
    19. Dean Neu & Gregory D. Saxton & Abu S. Rahaman, 2022. "Social Accountability, Ethics, and the Occupy Wall Street Protests," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 17-31, September.
    20. Chris Kimble & José Braga Vasconcelos & Álvaro Rocha, 2016. "Competence management in knowledge intensive organizations using consensual knowledge and ontologies," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1119-1130, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:10:p:197-:d:175494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.