IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i8p408-d1450624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Epistemic Justice through Inclusive Research about Intellectual Disability and Sexuality

Author

Listed:
  • Lesley Verbeek

    (Department of Digital Culture, Open University The Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

  • Mark Koning

    (Philadelphia Care Foundation, 3811 MZ Amersfoort, The Netherlands
    Disability Studies, University of Humanistic Studies, 3512 HD Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Alice Schippers

    (Disability Studies, University of Humanistic Studies, 3512 HD Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Formal language: This paper discusses inclusive research and epistemic justice by using an example of a published study the authors conducted on intellectual disability and sexuality in supported living environments. Our study addressed taboos and pushed boundaries in content and methodology through two ways of inclusive research: (1) the second author of this paper who has an intellectual disability was a main researcher in the study; and (2) we interviewed people with intellectual disabilities about their own experiences as well as their desired solutions to obstacles they face in their supported living environments. Their input was centralized in the final research report. This method challenged the epistemic injustice of who have historically not been ‘allowed’ to produce knowledge in research. This paper offers historical insight into epistemic injustice as well as relational approaches from critical disability studies and non-Western understandings of disability that ‘rethink’ disability and that can thus promote epistemic justice in academic theory. By addressing both practice and theory in this paper, we aim to contribute to the growing body of inclusive research and to the epistemic justice of people with intellectual disabilities. Plain language: (1) Epistemology = thinking about knowledge, producing knowledge, sharing knowledge. (2) In history, people with intellectual disabilities have often been excluded from participating in this. This is called epistemic injustice. It is caused by the discrimination of people with intellectual disabilities (ableism). (3) Performing inclusive research with people with intellectual disabilities challenges this. It contributes to epistemic justice. Researchers and interviewees with intellectual disabilities can bring knowledge from lived experience into research. (4) Knowledge from lived experience has not always been valued in traditional research. That means we also need to think differently about ‘knowledge’, and about ‘disability’ and its ‘value’. (5) Discrimination based on disability has a long history. For instance: during colonialism by European countries (starting in the 15th century), false ideas about ‘poor health’ and ‘low intelligence’ were already used to justify slavery. People with disabilities have often been locked away or even killed because they have been seen as ‘less valuable’. These ways of thinking still exist. They influence our understanding of ‘epistemology’ because they decide whose way of thinking and way of life is valuable or not valuable. We need to change this way of thinking. (6) Some academic fields that help are critical disability studies, indigenous studies, and feminist posthumanism. These fields challenge ableist ways of thinking. They can help us understand disability as something that is not negative or less valuable, but simply part of what makes us human.

Suggested Citation

  • Lesley Verbeek & Mark Koning & Alice Schippers, 2024. "Understanding Epistemic Justice through Inclusive Research about Intellectual Disability and Sexuality," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:408-:d:1450624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/8/408/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/8/408/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beth Patin & Melinda Sebastian & Jieun Yeon & Danielle Bertolini & Alexandra Grimm, 2021. "Interrupting epistemicide: A practical framework for naming, identifying, and ending epistemic injustice in the information professions," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(10), pages 1306-1318, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah Cummings & Charles Dhewa & Gladys Kemboi & Stacey Young, 2023. "Doing epistemic justice in sustainable development: Applying the philosophical concept of epistemic injustice to the real world," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1965-1977, June.
    2. Bharat Mehra, 2023. "Toward an impact‐driven framework to operationalize social justice and implement ICT4D in the field of information," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(12), pages 1419-1436, December.
    3. Hengelaar, Aldiene Henrieke & Verdonk, Petra & van Hartingsveldt, Margo & Abma, Tineke, 2024. "A sense of injustice in care networks: An intersectional exploration of the collaboration between professionals and carers with a migration background," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:408-:d:1450624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.