IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v74y2023i12p1419-1436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward an impact‐driven framework to operationalize social justice and implement ICT4D in the field of information

Author

Listed:
  • Bharat Mehra

Abstract

Information researchers can further social justice and social equity to meet the needs of minority and underserved populations experiencing intersecting modes of cultural marginalization. Scholars of information and communication technologies for development (ICT4D) can find overlooked intersections with social justice in “community networking” research since the 1980s to overcome the digital divides between the haves and have‐nots. To frame social justice initiatives within a consolidated vision of ICT4D in the field of information, this article proposes an impact‐driven framework, expounded through five interrelated elements: why (motivations), with who (engaged constituencies), how (at external and internal levels to change traditional practices), and toward what (goal). It is explicated through select historical instances of “community networking” and digital divides, ICT4D, and social justice intersections. Significance of the elements is also demonstrated via this author's select information‐related social justice research conducted in the United States. The urgency for critical and reflective conversations is important owing to historically abstracted human information behavior theory development within information research outdated in multiple contextualized needs of contemporary times. Historically situating impact‐driven social justice research is important to further the relevance, existence, and growth of the information field as it strengthens its ties with ICT4D.

Suggested Citation

  • Bharat Mehra, 2023. "Toward an impact‐driven framework to operationalize social justice and implement ICT4D in the field of information," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(12), pages 1419-1436, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:74:y:2023:i:12:p:1419-1436
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24693
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yingqin Zheng & Mathias Hatakka & Sundeep Sahay & Annika Andersson, 2018. "Conceptualizing development in information and communication technology for development (ICT4D)," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Diane Kelly, 2006. "Measuring online information seeking context, Part 2: Findings and discussion," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(14), pages 1862-1874, December.
    3. Kieran Mervyn & David K. Allen, 2012. "Sociospatial context and information behavior: Social exclusion and the influence of mobile information technology," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(6), pages 1125-1141, June.
    4. Kallol Bagchi, 2005. "Factors Contributing to Global Digital Divide: Some Empirical Results," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 47-65, July.
    5. Beth Patin & Melinda Sebastian & Jieun Yeon & Danielle Bertolini & Alexandra Grimm, 2021. "Interrupting epistemicide: A practical framework for naming, identifying, and ending epistemic injustice in the information professions," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(10), pages 1306-1318, October.
    6. Geoff Walsham, 2017. "ICT4D research: reflections on history and future agenda," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 18-41, January.
    7. Stephen P. Harter, 1992. "Psychological relevance and information science," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 43(9), pages 602-615, October.
    8. Bo Xie & Daqing He & Tim Mercer & Youfa Wang & Dan Wu & Kenneth R. Fleischmann & Yan Zhang & Linda H. Yoder & Keri K. Stephens & Michael Mackert & Min Kyung Lee, 2020. "Global health crises are also information crises: A call to action," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(12), pages 1419-1423, December.
    9. Diane Kelly, 2006. "Measuring online information seeking context, Part 1: Background and method," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(13), pages 1729-1739, November.
    10. Nicholas J. Belkin & Stephen E. Robertson, 1976. "Information science and the phenomenon of information," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 27(4), pages 197-204, July.
    11. Kieran Mervyn & David K. Allen, 2012. "Sociospatial context and information behavior: Social exclusion and the influence of mobile information technology," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(6), pages 1125-1141, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ajay Purohit & Gaurav Chopra & Parshuram G. Dangwal, 2022. "Measuring the Effectiveness of the Project Management Information System (PMIS) on the Financial Wellness of Rural Households in the Hill Districts of Uttarakhand, India: An IS-FW Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-29, October.
    2. Sylvain Cibangu, 2022. "Posters and Development: A Case Study of Cell Phone Posters in the Rural Congo," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 12(4), pages 16-38.
    3. Ye, Lisha & Dai, Yishu & Dong, Xiaoying, 2022. "The enabling mechanism of shuren culture in ICT4D: A case study of rural China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Devendra Potnis & Macy Halladay & Sara‐Elizabeth Jones, 2023. "Consequences of information exchanges of vulnerable women on Facebook: An “information grounds” study informing value co‐creation and ICT4D research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(12), pages 1365-1383, December.
    5. Wayne de Fremery & Michael K. Buckland, 2022. "Context, relevance, and labor," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(9), pages 1268-1278, September.
    6. Chen,Rong - DECIG, 2021. "A Demand-Side View of Mobile Internet Adoption in the Global South," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9590, The World Bank.
    7. Ian Ruthven, 2021. "Resonance and the experience of relevance," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(5), pages 554-569, May.
    8. Ewa Lechman, 2012. "Technology convergence and digital divides. A country-level evidence for the period 2000–2010," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 31.
    9. Yang Bai, 2018. "Has the Global South become a playground for Western scholars in information and communication technologies for development? Evidence from a three-journal analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(3), pages 2139-2153, September.
    10. Ventura, Eva & Satorra, Albert, 2015. "A multiple indicator model for panel data: an application to ICT area-level variation," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127191, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    11. Zhang, Xiaoqun, 2013. "Income disparity and digital divide: The Internet Consumption Model and cross-country empirical research," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 515-529.
    12. Ezinne M. Emeana & Liz Trenchard & Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz, 2020. "The Revolution of Mobile Phone-Enabled Services for Agricultural Development (m-Agri Services) in Africa: The Challenges for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, January.
    13. Mengjia Wu & Yi Zhang & Mark Markley & Caitlin Cassidy & Nils Newman & Alan Porter, 2024. "COVID-19 knowledge deconstruction and retrieval: an intelligent bibliometric solution," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(11), pages 7229-7259, November.
    14. Hidalgo, Francisco & Quiñones-Ruiz, Xiomara F. & Birkenberg, Athena & Daum, Thomas & Bosch, Christine & Hirsch, Patrick & Birner, Regina, 2023. "Digitalization, sustainability, and coffee. Opportunities and challenges for agricultural development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    15. Lesley Verbeek & Mark Koning & Alice Schippers, 2024. "Understanding Epistemic Justice through Inclusive Research about Intellectual Disability and Sexuality," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-11, August.
    16. Bera, Subhasis, 2019. "Club convergence and drivers of digitalization across Indian states," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1-1.
    17. Arunabha Mukhopadhyay & Kallol K. Bagchi & Godwin John Udo, 2024. "Exploring the Main Factors Affecting Mobile Phone Growth Rates in Indian States," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 5746-5768, June.
    18. Jensen, Scott & Liu, Xiaozhong & Yu, Yingying & Milojevic, Staša, 2016. "Generation of topic evolution trees from heterogeneous bibliographic networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 606-621.
    19. Darrin Baines & Robert J R Elliott, 2020. "Defining misinformation, disinformation and malinformation: An urgent need for clarity during the COVID-19 infodemic," Discussion Papers 20-06, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
    20. Dan Zhang & Loo G. Pee & Shan L. Pan & Jingyuan Wang, 2024. "Information practices in data analytics for supporting public health surveillance," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(1), pages 79-93, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:74:y:2023:i:12:p:1419-1436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.