IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v10y2021i7p253-d587349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Differences in Social Networks Based on Prevailing Kinship Norms in the Mosuo of China

Author

Listed:
  • Siobhán M. Mattison

    (Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
    National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA)

  • Neil G. MacLaren

    (Bernard M. and Ruth R. Bass Center for Leadership Studies, Binghamton University (SUNY), Binghamton, NY 13902, USA)

  • Ruizhe Liu

    (Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA)

  • Adam Z. Reynolds

    (Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA)

  • Gabrielle D. Baca

    (Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA)

  • Peter M. Mattison

    (Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA)

  • Meng Zhang

    (Department of Cultural Heritage and Museology and Institute of Archaeological Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Chun-Yi Sum

    (College of General Studies, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA)

  • Mary K. Shenk

    (Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16801, USA)

  • Tami Blumenfield

    (Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
    School of Ethnology and Sociology, Yunnan University, Kunming 650106, China)

  • Christopher von Rueden

    (Jepson School of Leadership Studies, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA 23173, USA)

  • Katherine Wander

    (Department of Anthropology, Binghamton University (SUNY), Binghamton, NY 13902, USA)

Abstract

Although cooperative social networks are considered key to human evolution, emphasis has usually been placed on the functions of men’s cooperative networks. What do women’s networks look like? Do they differ from men’s networks and what does this suggest about evolutionarily inherited gender differences in reproductive and social strategies? In this paper, we test the ‘universal gender differences’ hypothesis positing gender-specific network structures against the ‘gender reversal’ hypothesis that posits that women’s networks look more ‘masculine’ under matriliny. Specifically, we ask whether men’s friendship networks are always larger than women’s networks and we investigate measures of centrality by gender and descent system. To do so, we use tools from social network analysis and data on men’s and women’s friendship ties in matrilineal and patrilineal Mosuo communities. In tentative support of the gender reversal hypothesis, we find that women’s friendship networks in matriliny are relatively large. Measures of centrality and generalized linear models otherwise reveal greater differences between communities than between men and women. The data and analyses we present are primarily descriptive given limitations of sample size and sampling strategy. Nonetheless, our results provide support for the flexible application of social relationships across genders and clearly challenge the predominant narrative of universal gender differences across space and time.

Suggested Citation

  • Siobhán M. Mattison & Neil G. MacLaren & Ruizhe Liu & Adam Z. Reynolds & Gabrielle D. Baca & Peter M. Mattison & Meng Zhang & Chun-Yi Sum & Mary K. Shenk & Tami Blumenfield & Christopher von Rueden & , 2021. "Gender Differences in Social Networks Based on Prevailing Kinship Norms in the Mosuo of China," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:7:p:253-:d:587349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/7/253/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/7/253/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alberto Alesina & Paola Giuliano & Nathan Nunn, 2013. "On the Origins of Gender Roles: Women and the Plough," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 128(2), pages 469-530.
    2. Qiao-Qiao He & Jia-Jia Wu & Ting Ji & Yi Tao & Ruth Mace, 2016. "Not leaving home: grandmothers and male dispersal in a duolocal human society," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(5), pages 1343-1352.
    3. Friebel, Guido & Lalanne, Marie & Richter, Bernard & Schwardmann, Peter & Seabright, Paul, 2021. "Gender differences in social interactions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 33-45.
    4. Elaine M. Liu & Sharon Xuejing Zuo, 2019. "Measuring the impact of interaction between children of a matrilineal and a patriarchal culture on gender differences in risk aversion," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116(14), pages 6713-6719, April.
    5. Steffen Andersen & Erwin Bulte & Uri Gneezy & John A. List, 2008. "Do Women Supply More Public Goods Than Men? Preliminary Experimental Evidence from Matrilineal and Patriarchal Societies," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(2), pages 376-381, May.
    6. Coren L. Apicella & Frank W. Marlowe & James H. Fowler & Nicholas A. Christakis, 2012. "Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers," Nature, Nature, vol. 481(7382), pages 497-501, January.
    7. Sarah Alami & Christopher von Rueden & Edmond Seabright & Thomas S. Kraft & Aaron D. Blackwell & Jonathan Stieglitz & Hillard Kaplan & Michael Gurven, 2020. "Mother's social status is associated with child health in a horticulturalist population," Post-Print hal-02550726, HAL.
    8. Ilse Lindenlaub & Anja Prummer, 2021. "Network Structure and Performance," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(634), pages 851-898.
    9. Jia-Jia Wu & Ting Ji & Qiao-Qiao He & Juan Du & Ruth Mace, 2015. "Cooperation is related to dispersal patterns in Sino-Tibetan populations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-6, December.
    10. Binglin Gong & Huibin Yan & Chun-Lei Yang, 2015. "Gender differences in the dictator experiment: evidence from the matrilineal Mosuo and the patriarchal Yi," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 18(2), pages 302-313, June.
    11. Anna, Petrenko, 2016. "Мaркування готової продукції як складова частина інформаційного забезпечення маркетингової діяльності підприємств овочепродуктового підкомплексу," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 2(1), March.
    12. Leonard S Peperkoorn & D Vaughn Becker & Daniel Balliet & Simon Columbus & Catherine Molho & Paul A M Van Lange, 2020. "The prevalence of dyads in social life," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Friederike Mengel, 2020. "Gender differences in networking," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 130(630), pages 1842-1873.
    14. Gong, Binglin & Yang, Chun-Lei, 2012. "Gender differences in risk attitudes: Field experiments on the matrilineal Mosuo and the patriarchal Yi," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 59-65.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ge, Erhao & Cairang, Dongzhi & Mace, Ruth, 2022. "Religiosity structures social networks in a Tibetan population," OSF Preprints qpa4b, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schwieren, Christiane & Klonner, Stefan & Pal, Sumantra, 2020. "Equality of the Sexes and Gender Differences in Competition: Evidence from Three Traditional Societies," VfS Annual Conference 2020 (Virtual Conference): Gender Economics 224523, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    2. Shagata Mukherjee, 2020. "What Drives Gender Differences in Trust and Trustworthiness?," Public Finance Review, , vol. 48(6), pages 778-805, November.
    3. Giuliano, Paola, 2017. "Gender: An Historical Perspective," CEPR Discussion Papers 12183, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Hiller, Victor & Baudin, Thomas, 2016. "Cultural transmission and the evolution of gender roles," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 8-23.
    5. Antonio M. Espin & Valerio Capraro & Brice Corgnet & Simon Gachter & Roberto Hernan-Gonzalez & Praveen Kujal & Stephen Rassenti, 2021. "Differences in Cognitive Reflection Mediate Gender Differences in Social Preferences," Working Papers 21-22, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    6. Lowes, Sara, 2021. "Kinship structure, stress, and the gender gap in competition," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 36-57.
    7. Binglin Gong & Huibin Yan & Chun-Lei Yang, 2015. "Gender differences in the dictator experiment: evidence from the matrilineal Mosuo and the patriarchal Yi," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 18(2), pages 302-313, June.
    8. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/1divsbu8t888r9vqektjbmlqoa is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Barbara Boelmann & Anna Raute & Uta Schönberg, 2020. "Wind of Change? Cultural Determinants of Maternal Labor Supply," RF Berlin - CReAM Discussion Paper Series 2020, Rockwool Foundation Berlin (RF Berlin) - Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM).
    10. Anke Becker, 2019. "On the Economic Origins of Restrictions on Women's Sexuality," CESifo Working Paper Series 7770, CESifo.
    11. Claude Diebolt & Michael Haupert, 2021. "The Role of Cliometrics in History and Economics," Working Papers of BETA 2021-26, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    12. Yann Algan & Sergei Guriev & Elias Papaioannou & Evgenia Passari, 2017. "The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 48(2 (Fall)), pages 309-400.
    13. Brenøe, Anne Ardila & Epper, Thomas, 2019. "Parenting Values Moderate the Intergenerational Transmission of Time Preferences," Economics Working Paper Series 1917, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    14. Marta De Philippis & Federico Rossi, 2021. "Parents, Schools and Human Capital Differences Across Countries," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 19(2), pages 1364-1406.
    15. Boelmann, Barbara & Raute, Anna & Schönberg, Uta, 2020. "Wind of Change? Cultural Determinants of Maternal Labor Supply," IAB-Discussion Paper 202030, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    16. Buhai, I. Sebastian & van der Leij, Marco J., 2023. "A Social Network Analysis of Occupational Segregation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    17. Lata Gangadharan & Tarun Jain & Pushkar Maitra & Joe Vecci, 2022. "Lab-in-the-field experiments: perspectives from research on gender," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 31-59, January.
    18. Cornelia Chadi & Uwe Jirjahn, 2019. "Does Society Influence the Gender Gap in Risk Attitudes? Evidence from East and West Germany," Research Papers in Economics 2019-01, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    19. Ductor, Lorenzo & Prummer, Anja, 2024. "Gender homophily, collaboration, and output," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 477-492.
    20. Uwe Jirjahn & Cornelia Chadi, 2020. "Out-of-partnership births in East and West Germany," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 853-881, September.
    21. Davide Cantoni & Noam Yuchtman, 2020. "Historical Natural Experiments: Bridging Economics and Economic History," NBER Working Papers 26754, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:7:p:253-:d:587349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.