IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v70y2016icp387-396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling loss data using mixtures of distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Miljkovic, Tatjana
  • Grün, Bettina

Abstract

In this paper, we propose an alternative approach for flexible modeling of heavy tailed, skewed insurance loss data exhibiting multimodality, such as the well-known data set on Danish Fire losses. Our approach is based on finite mixture models of univariate distributions where all K components of the mixture are assumed to be from the same parametric family. Six models are developed with components from parametric, non-Gaussian families of distributions previously used in actuarial modeling: Burr, Gamma, Inverse Burr, Inverse Gaussian, Log-normal, and Weibull. Some of these component distributions are already alone suitable to model data with heavy tails, but do not cover the case of multimodality. Estimation of the models with a fixed number of components K is proposed based on the EM algorithm using three different initialization strategies: distance-based, k-means, and random initialization. Model selection is possible using information criteria, and the fitted models can be used to estimate risk measures for the data, such as VaR and TVaR. The results of the mixture models are compared to the composite Weibull models considered in recent literature as the best models for modeling Danish Fire insurance losses. The results of this paper provide new valuable tools in the area of insurance loss modeling and risk evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Miljkovic, Tatjana & Grün, Bettina, 2016. "Modeling loss data using mixtures of distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 387-396.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:70:y:2016:i:c:p:387-396
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2016.06.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668715303140
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2016.06.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Resnick, Sidney I., 1997. "Discussion of the Danish Data on Large Fire Insurance Losses," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 139-151, May.
    2. Simon Lee & X. Lin, 2010. "Modeling and Evaluating Insurance Losses Via Mixtures of Erlang Distributions," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 107-130.
    3. Stuart Klugman & Jacques Rioux, 2006. "Toward a Unified Approach to Fitting Loss Models," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 63-83.
    4. Grün, Bettina & Leisch, Friedrich, 2008. "FlexMix Version 2: Finite Mixtures with Concomitant Variables and Varying and Constant Parameters," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 28(i04).
    5. Pigeon, Mathieu & Denuit, Michel, 2011. "Composite Lognormal-Pareto model with random threshold," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2011020, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    6. McNeil, Alexander J., 1997. "Estimating the Tails of Loss Severity Distributions Using Extreme Value Theory," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 117-137, May.
    7. Roel Verbelen & Katrien Antonio & Gerda Claeskens, 2016. "Multivariate mixtures of Erlangs for density estimation under censoring," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 429-455, July.
    8. Verbelen, Roel & Gong, Lan & Antonio, Katrien & Badescu, Andrei & Lin, Sheldon, 2015. "Fitting Mixtures Of Erlangs To Censored And Truncated Data Using The Em Algorithm," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(3), pages 729-758, September.
    9. Abu Bakar, S.A. & Hamzah, N.A. & Maghsoudi, M. & Nadarajah, S., 2015. "Modeling loss data using composite models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 146-154.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reynkens, Tom & Verbelen, Roel & Beirlant, Jan & Antonio, Katrien, 2017. "Modelling censored losses using splicing: A global fit strategy with mixed Erlang and extreme value distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 65-77.
    2. Delong, Łukasz & Lindholm, Mathias & Wüthrich, Mario V., 2021. "Gamma Mixture Density Networks and their application to modelling insurance claim amounts," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 240-261.
    3. Ignatieva, Katja & Landsman, Zinoviy, 2019. "Conditional tail risk measures for the skewed generalised hyperbolic family," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 98-114.
    4. Shi, Yue & Punzo, Antonio & Otneim, Håkon & Maruotti, Antonello, 2023. "Hidden semi-Markov models for rainfall-related insurance claims," Discussion Papers 2023/17, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    5. Makariou, Despoina & Barrieu, Pauline & Tzougas, George, 2021. "A finite mixture modelling perspective for combining experts’ opinions with an application to quantile-based risk measures," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110763, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Fung, Tsz Chai, 2022. "Maximum weighted likelihood estimator for robust heavy-tail modelling of finite mixture models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 180-198.
    7. Alexeev Vitali & Ignatieva Katja & Liyanage Thusitha, 2021. "Dependence Modelling in Insurance via Copulas with Skewed Generalised Hyperbolic Marginals," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 25(2), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Salvatore D. Tomarchio & Antonio Punzo, 2019. "Modelling the loss given default distribution via a family of zero‐and‐one inflated mixture models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 182(4), pages 1247-1266, October.
    9. Tianxing Yan & Yi Lu & Himchan Jeong, 2024. "Dependence Modelling for Heavy-Tailed Multi-Peril Insurance Losses," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Ahmed Z. Afify & Ahmed M. Gemeay & Noor Akma Ibrahim, 2020. "The Heavy-Tailed Exponential Distribution: Risk Measures, Estimation, and Application to Actuarial Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-28, August.
    11. Verschuren, Robert Matthijs, 2022. "Frequency-severity experience rating based on latent Markovian risk profiles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 379-392.
    12. Richardson, Robert & Hartman, Brian, 2018. "Bayesian nonparametric regression models for modeling and predicting healthcare claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-8.
    13. Blostein, Martin & Miljkovic, Tatjana, 2019. "On modeling left-truncated loss data using mixtures of distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 35-46.
    14. Ruben Dewitte & Michel Dumont & Glenn Rayp & Peter Willemé, 2022. "Unobserved heterogeneity in the productivity distribution and gains from trade," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 1566-1597, August.
    15. Min Deng & Mostafa S. Aminzadeh, 2023. "Bayesian Inference for the Loss Models via Mixture Priors," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-27, August.
    16. Bhati, Deepesh & Ravi, Sreenivasan, 2018. "On generalized log-Moyal distribution: A new heavy tailed size distribution," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 247-259.
    17. Semhar Michael & Tatjana Miljkovic & Volodymyr Melnykov, 2020. "Mixture modeling of data with multiple partial right-censoring levels," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(2), pages 355-378, June.
    18. Tatjana Miljkovic & Daniel Fernández, 2018. "On Two Mixture-Based Clustering Approaches Used in Modeling an Insurance Portfolio," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Naderi, Mehrdad & Hashemi, Farzane & Bekker, Andriette & Jamalizadeh, Ahad, 2020. "Modeling right-skewed financial data streams: A likelihood inference based on the generalized Birnbaum–Saunders mixture model," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 376(C).
    20. Počuča, Nikola & Jevtić, Petar & McNicholas, Paul D. & Miljkovic, Tatjana, 2020. "Modeling frequency and severity of claims with the zero-inflated generalized cluster-weighted models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 79-93.
    21. Despoina Makariou & Pauline Barrieu & George Tzougas, 2021. "A Finite Mixture Modelling Perspective for Combining Experts’ Opinions with an Application to Quantile-Based Risk Measures," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-25, June.
    22. Maruotti, Antonello & Petrella, Lea & Sposito, Luca, 2021. "Hidden semi-Markov-switching quantile regression for time series," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    23. Fung, Tsz Chai & Badescu, Andrei L. & Lin, X. Sheldon, 2019. "A class of mixture of experts models for general insurance: Theoretical developments," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 111-127.
    24. Eling, Martin & Loperfido, Nicola, 2017. "Data breaches: Goodness of fit, pricing, and risk measurement," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 126-136.
    25. Ignatieva, Katja & Landsman, Zinoviy, 2021. "A class of generalised hyper-elliptical distributions and their applications in computing conditional tail risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 437-465.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reynkens, Tom & Verbelen, Roel & Beirlant, Jan & Antonio, Katrien, 2017. "Modelling censored losses using splicing: A global fit strategy with mixed Erlang and extreme value distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 65-77.
    2. Semhar Michael & Tatjana Miljkovic & Volodymyr Melnykov, 2020. "Mixture modeling of data with multiple partial right-censoring levels," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(2), pages 355-378, June.
    3. Bhati, Deepesh & Ravi, Sreenivasan, 2018. "On generalized log-Moyal distribution: A new heavy tailed size distribution," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 247-259.
    4. Blostein, Martin & Miljkovic, Tatjana, 2019. "On modeling left-truncated loss data using mixtures of distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 35-46.
    5. S. A. Abu Bakar & Saralees Nadarajah & Z. A. Absl Kamarul Adzhar, 2018. "Loss modeling using Burr mixtures," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1503-1516, June.
    6. Shi, Yue & Punzo, Antonio & Otneim, Håkon & Maruotti, Antonello, 2023. "Hidden semi-Markov models for rainfall-related insurance claims," Discussion Papers 2023/17, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    7. Athanasios Sachlas & Takis Papaioannou, 2014. "Residual and Past Entropy in Actuarial Science and Survival Models," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 79-99, March.
    8. Fung, Tsz Chai, 2022. "Maximum weighted likelihood estimator for robust heavy-tail modelling of finite mixture models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 180-198.
    9. Rocco Roberto Cerchiara & Francesco Acri, 2020. "Estimating the Volatility of Non-Life Premium Risk Under Solvency II: Discussion of Danish Fire Insurance Data," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Yin, Cuihong & Sheldon Lin, X. & Huang, Rongtan & Yuan, Haili, 2019. "On the consistency of penalized MLEs for Erlang mixtures," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 12-20.
    11. Eling, Martin, 2012. "Fitting insurance claims to skewed distributions: Are the skew-normal and skew-student good models?," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 239-248.
    12. Alessandro Staino & Emilio Russo & Massimo Costabile & Arturo Leccadito, 2023. "Minimum capital requirement and portfolio allocation for non-life insurance: a semiparametric model with Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) constraint," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-32, December.
    13. Luis Rincón & David J. Santana, 2022. "Ruin Probability for Finite Erlang Mixture Claims Via Recurrence Sequences," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 2213-2236, September.
    14. Arthur Charpentier & Emmanuel Flachaire, 2021. "Pareto Models for Risk Management," Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance, in: Gilles Dufrénot & Takashi Matsuki (ed.), Recent Econometric Techniques for Macroeconomic and Financial Data, pages 355-387, Springer.
    15. Jackie Li & Jia Liu, 2023. "Claims Modelling with Three-Component Composite Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    16. Sarra Ghaddab & Manel Kacem & Christian Peretti & Lotfi Belkacem, 2023. "Extreme severity modeling using a GLM-GPD combination: application to an excess of loss reinsurance treaty," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 1105-1127, September.
    17. Bernard, Carole & Kazzi, Rodrigue & Vanduffel, Steven, 2020. "Range Value-at-Risk bounds for unimodal distributions under partial information," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 9-24.
    18. Roel Verbelen & Katrien Antonio & Gerda Claeskens, 2016. "Multivariate mixtures of Erlangs for density estimation under censoring," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 429-455, July.
    19. Delong, Łukasz & Lindholm, Mathias & Wüthrich, Mario V., 2021. "Gamma Mixture Density Networks and their application to modelling insurance claim amounts," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 240-261.
    20. Počuča, Nikola & Jevtić, Petar & McNicholas, Paul D. & Miljkovic, Tatjana, 2020. "Modeling frequency and severity of claims with the zero-inflated generalized cluster-weighted models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 79-93.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Mixtures; Non-Gaussian distributions; EM algorithm; Risk measures; Danish Fire insurance losses;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C02 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Mathematical Economics
    • C40 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - General
    • C60 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:70:y:2016:i:c:p:387-396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.