IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v14y2025i2p21-d1579054.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Concrete Mix Design of Recycled Concrete Aggregate (RCA): Analysis of Review Papers, Characteristics, Research Trends, and Underexplored Topics

Author

Listed:
  • Lapyote Prasittisopin

    (Center of Excellence on Green Tech in Architecture, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
    Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand)

  • Wiput Tuvayanond

    (Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Thanyaburi, Pathum Thani 12110, Thailand)

  • Thomas H.-K. Kang

    (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-744, Republic of Korea)

  • Sakdirat Kaewunruen

    (Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK)

Abstract

Recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) has been widely adopted in construction and emerged as a sustainable alternative to conventional natural aggregates in the construction industry. However, the study of holistic perspectives in recent literature is lacking. This review paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of RCA, highlighting its properties, applications, and overall sustainability benefits to facilitate the comprehensive points of view of technology, ecology, and economics. This paper explores the manufacturing process of RCA, examines its mechanical and durability characteristics, and investigates its environmental impacts. Furthermore, it delves into the various applications of RCA, such as road construction materials, pavement bases, and concrete materials, considering their life cycle performance and economic considerations. This review reveals that there is a need for systemic data collection that could enable automated concrete mix design. The findings concerning various mix concrete designs suggest that increasing the 1% replacement level reduces the compressive strength by 0.1913% for coarse RCA and 0.2418% for fine RCA. The current critical research gaps are the durability of RCA concrete, feasibility analyses, and the implementation of treatment methods for RCA improvement. An effective life cycle assessment tool and digitalization technologies can be applied to enhance the circular economy, aligning with the United Nations’ sustainable development goals (UN-SDGs). The equivalent mortar volume method used to calculate the RCA concrete mix design, which can contain chemical additives, metakaolin, and fibers, needs further assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Lapyote Prasittisopin & Wiput Tuvayanond & Thomas H.-K. Kang & Sakdirat Kaewunruen, 2025. "Concrete Mix Design of Recycled Concrete Aggregate (RCA): Analysis of Review Papers, Characteristics, Research Trends, and Underexplored Topics," Resources, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-46, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:21-:d:1579054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/14/2/21/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/14/2/21/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bajra, Ujkan Q. & Ermir Rogova, & Avdiaj, Sefer, 2024. "Cryptocurrency blockchain and its carbon footprint: Anticipating future challenges," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Müller-Casseres, Eduardo & Edelenbosch, Oreane Y. & Szklo, Alexandre & Schaeffer, Roberto & van Vuuren, Detlef P., 2021. "Global futures of trade impacting the challenge to decarbonize the international shipping sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    3. Katerusha, Dmytro, 2021. "Barriers to the use of recycled concrete from the perspective of executing companies and possible solution approaches - case study Germany and Switzerland," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Ali Turkyilmaz & Mert Guney & Ferhat Karaca & Zhanar Bagdatkyzy & Aiganym Sandybayeva & Gulzat Sirenova, 2019. "A Comprehensive Construction and Demolition Waste Management Model using PESTEL and 3R for Construction Companies Operating in Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Federica Vitale & Maurizio Nicolella, 2021. "Mortars with Recycled Aggregates from Building-Related Processes: A ‘Four-Step’ Methodological Proposal for a Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-31, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sonia Chien-i Chen & Xin Dang & Qian-qian Xu & Chung-Ming Own, 2024. "Transforming Waste into Value: Sustainable Recycling of Agricultural Resources Under the ‘Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality’ Vision," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Jun Geng & Yi Huang & Xiang Li & Yun Zhang, 2023. "Overcoming Barriers to the Adoption of Recycled Construction Materials: A Comprehensive PEST Analysis and Tailored Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Vinicius Andrade dos Santos & Patrícia Pereira da Silva & Luís Manuel Ventura Serrano, 2022. "The Maritime Sector and Its Problematic Decarbonization: A Systematic Review of the Contribution of Alternative Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-30, May.
    4. Ellen Sterk, 2023. "Willingness to pay for recycled aggregates in concrete among German construction clients," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202311, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    5. Nepomuceno de Oliveira, Maurício Aguilar & Szklo, Alexandre & Castelo Branco, David Alves, 2022. "Implementation of Maritime Transport Mitigation Measures according to their marginal abatement costs and their mitigation potentials," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Georgios F. Banias & Christos Karkanias & Maria Batsioula & Lefteris D. Melas & Apostolos E. Malamakis & Dimitris Geroliolios & Stamatia Skoutida & Xenofon Spiliotis, 2022. "Environmental Assessment of Alternative Strategies for the Management of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Life Cycle Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-12, August.
    7. Padmanathan Kasinathan & Rishi Pugazhendhi & Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan & Vigna Kumaran Ramachandaramurthy & Vinoth Ramanathan & Senthilkumar Subramanian & Sachin Kumar & Kamalakannan Nandhagopal & , 2022. "Realization of Sustainable Development Goals with Disruptive Technologies by Integrating Industry 5.0, Society 5.0, Smart Cities and Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-31, November.
    8. Cary, Michael & Stephens, Heather M., 2024. "Economic, environmental, and technical gains from the Kyoto Protocol: Evidence from cement manufacturing," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Nehal Elshaboury & Abobakr Al-Sakkaf & Eslam Mohammed Abdelkader & Ghasan Alfalah, 2022. "Construction and Demolition Waste Management Research: A Science Mapping Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-25, April.
    10. Sogut, M. Ziya, 2023. "A comparative analysis of a dry bulk carrier's fuel preference in terms of entropy and environmental sustainability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    11. Artūras Torkelis & Jolanta Dvarionienė & Gintaras Denafas, 2024. "The Factors Influencing the Recycling of Plastic and Composite Packaging Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-30, October.
    12. Sajjad Shuker Ullah & Ishtiaq Hassan & Syed Shujaa Safdar Gardezi, 2024. "Environmental Management Framework for Road Network Demolition Wastes for Construction Industry of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-30, May.
    13. Aidana Tleuken & Galym Tokazhanov & Kebir Mohammed Jemal & Ramazan Shaimakhanov & Magzhan Sovetbek & Ferhat Karaca, 2022. "Legislative, Institutional, Industrial and Governmental Involvement in Circular Economy in Central Asia: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-26, July.
    14. Hammadhu HaitherAli & G Anjali, 2024. "Circular Economy in Construction Sector—a Guideline for Policy Makers from Global Perspective," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1285-1313, June.
    15. Skov, Iva Ridjan & Schneider, Noémi, 2022. "Incentive structures for power-to-X and e-fuel pathways for transport in EU and member states," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    16. Guanru Wang & Dariusz Krzywda & Sergey Kondrashev & Lubov Vorona-Slivinskaya, 2021. "Recycling and Upcycling in the Practice of Waste Management of Construction Giants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    17. Weixin Yang & Hao Gao & Yunpeng Yang & Jiacheng Liao, 2022. "Embodied Carbon in China’s Export Trade: A Multi Region Input-Output Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Joanna Kizielewicz & Katarzyna Skrzeszewska, 2021. "Identifying Actions to Prepare Electricity Infrastructure in Seaports for Future Power Supplying Cruise Ships with Energy from Land," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Savindi Caldera & Tim Ryley & Nikita Zatyko, 2020. "Enablers and Barriers for Creating a Marketplace for Construction and Demolition Waste: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:21-:d:1579054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.