IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v160y2022ics0301421521005644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of Maritime Transport Mitigation Measures according to their marginal abatement costs and their mitigation potentials

Author

Listed:
  • Nepomuceno de Oliveira, Maurício Aguilar
  • Szklo, Alexandre
  • Castelo Branco, David Alves

Abstract

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has set a target to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from shipping by at least 50% in 2050 compared to 2008. Some studies focused on negative cost mitigation measures to achieve this goal, while it is almost a consensus that alternative maritime fuels with low or zero direct GHG emissions are needed. This article gathered data from implementation, marginal abatement costs (MAC) and mitigation potentials of 22 mitigation measures, to assess their implementation according to their MAC and GHG abatement potentials. Findings showed that measures with negative costs are more implemented than measures with positive costs, and that measures with negative costs have at least a 25% of implementation rate, with one exception, and for some, this exceeds 50%. Among the measures with high mitigation potential, only the use of alternative fuels without carbons measure has a low implementation rate. Nevertheless, it is crucial to reach the IMO's target. Hence, studies that analyze emission reduction scenarios should consider the implementation rate since there are still opportunities to overcome market barriers to measures with negative costs not yet fully implemented, especially with the approval of the EEXI and CII regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Nepomuceno de Oliveira, Maurício Aguilar & Szklo, Alexandre & Castelo Branco, David Alves, 2022. "Implementation of Maritime Transport Mitigation Measures according to their marginal abatement costs and their mitigation potentials," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:160:y:2022:i:c:s0301421521005644
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421521005644
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112699?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magnus S. Eide & Øyvind Endresen & Rolf Skjong & Tore Longva & Sverre Alvik, 2009. "Cost-effectiveness assessment of CO 2 reducing measures in shipping," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 367-384, August.
    2. Rehmatulla, Nishatabbas & Smith, Tristan, 2020. "The impact of split incentives on energy efficiency technology investments in maritime transport," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    3. Müller-Casseres, Eduardo & Carvalho, Francielle & Nogueira, Tainan & Fonte, Clarissa & Império, Mariana & Poggio, Matheus & Wei, Huang Ken & Portugal-Pereira, Joana & Rochedo, Pedro R.R. & Szklo, Alex, 2021. "Production of alternative marine fuels in Brazil: An integrated assessment perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    4. Halff, Antoine & Younes, Lara & Boersma, Tim, 2019. "The likely implications of the new IMO standards on the shipping industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 277-286.
    5. Yuan, Jun & Ng, Szu Hui & Sou, Weng Sut, 2016. "Uncertainty quantification of CO2 emission reduction for maritime shipping," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 113-130.
    6. Rehmatulla, Nishatabbas & Smith, Tristan, 2015. "Barriers to energy efficiency in shipping: A triangulated approach to investigate the principal agent problem," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 44-57.
    7. Rojon, Isabelle & Dieperink, Carel, 2014. "Blowin' in the wind? Drivers and barriers for the uptake of wind propulsion in international shipping," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 394-402.
    8. Müller-Casseres, Eduardo & Edelenbosch, Oreane Y. & Szklo, Alexandre & Schaeffer, Roberto & van Vuuren, Detlef P., 2021. "Global futures of trade impacting the challenge to decarbonize the international shipping sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    9. Francielle Carvalho & Joana Portugal-Pereira & Martin Junginger & Alexandre Szklo, 2021. "Biofuels for Maritime Transportation: A Spatial, Techno-Economic, and Logistic Analysis in Brazil, Europe, South Africa, and the USA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-27, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Catapano, F. & Frazzica, A. & Freni, A. & Manzan, M. & Micheli, D. & Palomba, V. & Sementa, P. & Vaglieco, B.M., 2022. "Development and experimental testing of an integrated prototype based on Stirling, ORC and a latent thermal energy storage system for waste heat recovery in naval application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Orestis Schinas & Niklas Bergmann, 2021. "The Short-Term Cost of Greening the Global Fleet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-32, August.
    2. Vinicius Andrade dos Santos & Patrícia Pereira da Silva & Luís Manuel Ventura Serrano, 2022. "The Maritime Sector and Its Problematic Decarbonization: A Systematic Review of the Contribution of Alternative Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-30, May.
    3. Li, Lingyue & Gao, Suixiang & Yang, Wenguo & Xiong, Xing, 2021. "Assessment and improvement of EPA's penalty policy: From the perspective of governments' and ships' behaviors," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 18-28.
    4. Yuan, Jun & Ng, Szu Hui, 2017. "Emission reduction measures ranking under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 270-279.
    5. Hu, Hongtao & Yuan, Jun & Nian, Victor, 2019. "Development of a multi-objective decision-making method to evaluate correlated decarbonization measures under uncertainty – The example of international shipping," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 148-157.
    6. Ángeles Longarela-Ares & Anxo Calvo-Silvosa & José-Benito Pérez-López, 2020. "The Influence of Economic Barriers and Drivers on Energy Efficiency Investments in Maritime Shipping, from the Perspective of the Principal-Agent Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-42, September.
    7. Fuller, Sam & Fleming, Kelly & Brown, Austin L. & Sperling, Daniel & Murphy, Colin, 2018. "Environmental Regulation Impacts on Freight Diversion," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt814582b5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    8. Akoh Fabien Yao & Maxime Sèbe & Laura Recuero Virto & Abdelhak Nassiri & Hervé Dumez, 2024. "The effect of LNG bunkering on port competitiveness using multilevel data analysis [L'effet du soutage par GNL sur la compétitivité des ports à l'aide de l'analyse de données à plusieurs niveaux]," Post-Print hal-04611804, HAL.
    9. Di Vaio, Assunta & Varriale, Luisa & Alvino, Federico, 2018. "Key performance indicators for developing environmentally sustainable and energy efficient ports: Evidence from Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 229-240.
    10. Assunta Di Vaio & Luisa Varriale, 2018. "Management Innovation for Environmental Sustainability in Seaports: Managerial Accounting Instruments and Training for Competitive Green Ports beyond the Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-35, March.
    11. Nguyen, Son & Fu, Xiuju & Ogawa, Daichi & Zheng, Qin, 2023. "An application-oriented testing regime and multi-ship predictive modeling for vessel fuel consumption prediction," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    12. Pierre Franc & Lisa Sutto, 2012. "Cap-and-trade system on CO2 emissions in maritime transport: potential impacts on shipping lines activities [Les permis d’émission de CO2 dans le transport maritime : quels effets possibles sur les," Post-Print halshs-01366275, HAL.
    13. Ghaforian Masodzadeh, Peyman & Ölçer, Aykut I. & Ballini, Fabio & Christodoulou, Anastasia, 2022. "How to bridge the short-term measures to the Market Based Measure? Proposal of a new hybrid MBM based on a new standard in ship operation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 123-142.
    14. Tayfun Uyanık & Emir Ejder & Yasin Arslanoğlu & Yunus Yalman & Yacine Terriche & Chun-Lien Su & Josep M. Guerrero, 2022. "Thermoelectric Generators as an Alternative Energy Source in Shipboard Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, June.
    15. Adland, Roar & Cariou, Pierre & Wolff, François-Charles, 2018. "Does energy efficiency affect ship values in the second-hand market?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 347-359.
    16. Dai, Lei & Hu, Hao & Wang, Zhaojing, 2020. "Is Shore Side Electricity greener? An environmental analysis and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    17. Jun Yuan & Haowei Wang & Szu Hui Ng & Victor Nian, 2020. "Ship Emission Mitigation Strategies Choice Under Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, May.
    18. Mäkitie, Tuukka & Steen, Markus & Saether, Erik Andreas & Bjørgum, Øyvind & Poulsen, René T., 2022. "Norwegian ship-owners' adoption of alternative fuels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    19. Liang, Xin & Yu, Tao & Hong, Jingke & Shen, Geoffrey Qiping, 2019. "Making incentive policies more effective: An agent-based model for energy-efficiency retrofit in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 177-189.
    20. Maxim A. Dulebenets & Junayed Pasha & Olumide F. Abioye & Masoud Kavoosi, 2021. "Vessel scheduling in liner shipping: a critical literature review and future research needs," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 43-106, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:160:y:2022:i:c:s0301421521005644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.