IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v275y2023ics0360544223007326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative analysis of a dry bulk carrier's fuel preference in terms of entropy and environmental sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Sogut, M. Ziya

Abstract

The marine industry has sectoral obligations for maintaining economic and environmental sustainability in addition to environmental responsibility because of its competitive effect. Particularly, institutional goals to lower emissions and energy use based on fossil fuels have emphasized alternatives based on updating ship technologies. Recently, choosing Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) for ships has provided a useful substitute for short-term forecasts and green transition. This study compares the performance of (Heavy-fuel oil) HFO and LNG fuels using data from a dry cargo ship's usage. Thermo-economic analyses including the environmental impact studies connected to entropy generation were used as a novel approach with new indicators. The analysis shows that the improvement potential for the ship's HFO consumption is 42.47%, whilst the improvement potential for LNG consumption is 35.12%. The sustainability index was found to be 0.23 and 0.25, whereas the environmental performance index was 0.66 and 0.59 for HFO and LNG, respectively. The engine's potential fuel efficiency was got to be discovered to be 18.73% and 12.60%, respectively. The impacts of this modification on ships were assessed at the end of the study, and sectoral preferences were suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Sogut, M. Ziya, 2023. "A comparative analysis of a dry bulk carrier's fuel preference in terms of entropy and environmental sustainability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:275:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223007326
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223007326
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoo, Byeong-Yong, 2017. "Economic assessment of liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a marine fuel for CO2 carriers compared to marine gas oil (MGO)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 772-780.
    2. Vinicius Andrade dos Santos & Patrícia Pereira da Silva & Luís Manuel Ventura Serrano, 2022. "The Maritime Sector and Its Problematic Decarbonization: A Systematic Review of the Contribution of Alternative Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-30, May.
    3. Ziya Sogut, M., 2021. "New approach for assessment of environmental effects based on entropy optimization of jet engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    4. Müller-Casseres, Eduardo & Edelenbosch, Oreane Y. & Szklo, Alexandre & Schaeffer, Roberto & van Vuuren, Detlef P., 2021. "Global futures of trade impacting the challenge to decarbonize the international shipping sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    5. Groppi, Daniele & Nastasi, Benedetto & Prina, Matteo Giacomo, 2022. "The EPLANoptMAC model to plan the decarbonisation of the maritime transport sector of a small island," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    6. Balcombe, Paul & Staffell, Iain & Kerdan, Ivan Garcia & Speirs, Jamie F. & Brandon, Nigel P. & Hawkes, Adam D., 2021. "How can LNG-fuelled ships meet decarbonisation targets? An environmental and economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bilgili, Levent, 2023. "A systematic review on the acceptance of alternative marine fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Vinicius Andrade dos Santos & Patrícia Pereira da Silva & Luís Manuel Ventura Serrano, 2022. "The Maritime Sector and Its Problematic Decarbonization: A Systematic Review of the Contribution of Alternative Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-30, May.
    3. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    4. Lixian Fan & Bingmei Gu, 2019. "Impacts of the Increasingly Strict Sulfur Limit on Compliance Option Choices: The Case Study of Chinese SECA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Jinxi Zhou & Junling Zhang & Guoxian Jiang & Kai Xie, 2024. "Using DPF to Control Particulate Matter Emissions from Ships to Ensure the Sustainable Development of the Shipping Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Trivyza, Nikoletta L. & Rentizelas, Athanasios & Theotokatos, Gerasimos, 2019. "Impact of carbon pricing on the cruise ship energy systems optimal configuration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 952-966.
    7. Kian-Guan Lim & Michelle Lim, 2020. "Financial performance of shipping firms that increase LNG carriers and the support of eco-innovation," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-25, December.
    8. Alessia Amato & Konstantina Tsigkou & Alessandro Becci & Francesca Beolchini & Nicolò M. Ippolito & Francesco Ferella, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Biomethane vs. Fossil Methane Production and Supply," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Yoo, Byeong-Yong, 2017. "The development and comparison of CO2 BOG re-liquefaction processes for LNG fueled CO2 carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 186-197.
    10. Hongjun Fan & Hossein Enshaei & Shantha Gamini Jayasinghe, 2022. "Formation of Dataset for Fuzzy Quantitative Risk Assessment of LNG Bunkering SIMOPs," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-13, May.
    11. Chang, Miguel & Lund, Henrik & Thellufsen, Jakob Zinck & Østergaard, Poul Alberg, 2023. "Perspectives on purpose-driven coupling of energy system models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    12. Ahmed, Shoaib & Li, Tie & Yi, Ping & Chen, Run, 2023. "Environmental impact assessment of green ammonia-powered very large tanker ship for decarbonized future shipping operations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    13. Minghan Sun & Yiwei Jia & Jian Wei & Jewel X. Zhu, 2023. "Exploring the Green-Oriented Transition Process of Ship Power Systems: A Patent-Based Overview on Innovation Trends and Patterns," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin, 2022. "Landing and take-off (LTO) flight phase performances of various piston-prop aviation engines in terms of energy, exergy, irreversibility, aviation, sustainability and environmental viewpoints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    15. Duan, Zhongdi & Zhu, Yifeng & Wang, Chenbiao & Yuan, Yuchao & Xue, Hongxiang & Tang, Wenyong, 2023. "Numerical and theoretical prediction of the thermodynamic response in marine LNG fuel tanks under sloshing conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    16. Dai, Lei & Hu, Hao & Wang, Zhaojing, 2020. "Is Shore Side Electricity greener? An environmental analysis and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    17. Nepomuceno de Oliveira, Maurício Aguilar & Szklo, Alexandre & Castelo Branco, David Alves, 2022. "Implementation of Maritime Transport Mitigation Measures according to their marginal abatement costs and their mitigation potentials," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    18. Huerta, Felipe & Vesovic, Velisa, 2019. "A realistic vapour phase heat transfer model for the weathering of LNG stored in large tanks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 280-291.
    19. Davide Borelli & Francesco Devia & Corrado Schenone & Federico Silenzi & Luca A. Tagliafico, 2021. "Dynamic Modelling of LNG Powered Combined Energy Systems in Port Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    20. Chulmin Hwang & Taejong Yu & Youngsub Lim, 2021. "Optimal Process Design of Small Scale SMR Process for LNG Vessel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:275:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223007326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.