IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i2p640-d478564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recycling and Upcycling in the Practice of Waste Management of Construction Giants

Author

Listed:
  • Guanru Wang

    (College of Life Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 610056, China)

  • Dariusz Krzywda

    (Faculty of Management, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42201 Czestochowa, Poland)

  • Sergey Kondrashev

    (Department of Chemistry, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia)

  • Lubov Vorona-Slivinskaya

    (Department of Construction Technology, Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (SPbGASU), 190005 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of recycling and upcycling technologies on the level of efficiency of large construction companies in the context of waste management practice. The research methodology was based on regression analysis and factorial analysis of variance. Based on the assessment of waste management efficiency in the context of recycling (upcycling), the positive dynamics of the efficiency of its implementation was determined in comparison with traditional waste disposal. The levels of the relationship among net profit, investment in waste management, and recycling efficiency for the companies under study were determined. Regression analysis of the impact of recycling efficiency on the performance of the companies under study in the context of waste management demonstrated a positive effect of an increase in the efficiency of recycling (upcycling) on the net profit of all companies under study. However, at the same time, there was a different effect and degree of influence of this indicator according to the formed scenarios. Despite the high efficiency of recycling (upcycling), the prospective increase in its level does not have a proportional relationship with profit but depends on the development factors of the construction company. Two-way analysis of variance demonstrated a strong influence of the efficiency of recycling (upcycling) and waste disposal on waste management efficiency. It was proven that companies that currently have a high level of recycling (upcycling) efficiency are practically not focused on traditional waste disposal, since recycling has a more significant and positive impact on the effectiveness of their activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Guanru Wang & Dariusz Krzywda & Sergey Kondrashev & Lubov Vorona-Slivinskaya, 2021. "Recycling and Upcycling in the Practice of Waste Management of Construction Giants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:640-:d:478564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/640/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/640/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristina IACOBOAEA & Mihaela ALDEA & Florian PETRESCU, 2019. "Construction And Demolition Waste - A Challenge For The European Union?," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 30-52, February.
    2. Soo Huey Teh & Thomas Wiedmann & Stephen Moore, 2018. "Mixed-unit hybrid life cycle assessment applied to the recycling of construction materials," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 7(1), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Chakkrit Luangcharoenrat & Singh Intrachooto & Vachara Peansupap & Wandee Sutthinarakorn, 2019. "Factors Influencing Construction Waste Generation in Building Construction: Thailand’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Mukherjee, C. & Denney, J. & Mbonimpa, E.G. & Slagley, J. & Bhowmik, R., 2020. "A review on municipal solid waste-to-energy trends in the USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Paola Villoria Sáez & Mercedes Del Río Merino & César Porras-Amores & Jaime Santa Cruz Astorqui & Natalia González Pericot, 2019. "Analysis of Best Practices to Prevent and Manage the Waste Generated in Building Rehabilitation Works," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    6. Vivian W. Y. Tam & Khoa N. Le & J. Y. Wang & I. M. Chethana S. Illankoon, 2018. "Practitioners Recycling Attitude and Behaviour in the Australian Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Ali Turkyilmaz & Mert Guney & Ferhat Karaca & Zhanar Bagdatkyzy & Aiganym Sandybayeva & Gulzat Sirenova, 2019. "A Comprehensive Construction and Demolition Waste Management Model using PESTEL and 3R for Construction Companies Operating in Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Qidan Hu & Ying Peng & Chunxiang Guo & Dong Cai & Peiyang Su, 2019. "Dynamic Incentive Mechanism Design for Recycling Construction and Demolition Waste under Dual Information Asymmetry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Olga Fedotkina & Elena Gorbashko & Natalia Vatolkina, 2019. "Circular Economy in Russia: Drivers and Barriers for Waste Management Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-21, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guzel Salimova & Alisa Ableeva & Rasul Gusmanov & Gulnara Nigmatullina & Tatyana Lubova, 2024. "Multidimensional Assessment of the Labour Market in the Regions of the Russian Federation," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 67(2), pages 547-569, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Giel & Artur Kierzkowski, 2021. "A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Model for Municipal Waste Treatment Systems Evaluation including Energy Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Agnieszka Kuś & Dorota Grego-Planer, 2021. "A Model of Innovation Activity in Small Enterprises in the Context of Selected Financial Factors: The Example of the Renewable Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Deng Li & Ying Peng & Chunxiang Guo & Ruwen Tan, 2019. "Pricing Strategy of Construction and Demolition Waste Considering Retailer Fairness Concerns under a Governmental Regulation Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Sasha Shahbazi & Kerstin Johansen & Erik Sundin, 2021. "Product Design for Automated Remanufacturing—A Case Study of Electric and Electronic Equipment in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Siqueira, Mario B. & Monteiro Filho, Arthur, 2021. "Hybrid concentrating solar-landfill gas power-generation concept for landfill energy recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    6. Ferraz de Campos, Victor Arruda & Silva, Valter Bruno & Cardoso, João Sousa & Brito, Paulo S. & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Silveira, José Luz, 2021. "A review of waste management in Brazil and Portugal: Waste-to-energy as pathway for sustainable development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 802-820.
    7. Kumar, Aman & Singh, Ekta & Mishra, Rahul & Lo, Shang Lien & Kumar, Sunil, 2023. "Global trends in municipal solid waste treatment technologies through the lens of sustainable energy development opportunity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    8. Edgar Battand Towa Kouokam & Vanessa Zeller & Wouter Achten, 2019. "Input-output models and waste management analysis: A critical review," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/359535, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    9. Gangga Muniandy & Marhana Mohamed Anuar & Bob Foster & Jumadil Saputra & Muhamad Deni Johansyah & Tran Tien Khoa & Zafar U. Ahmed, 2021. "Determinants of Sustainable Waste Management Behavior of Malaysian Academics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Gabi Försterling & Ronald Orth & Benjamin Gellert, 2023. "Transition to a Circular Economy in Europe through New Business Models: Barriers, Drivers, and Policy Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-40, May.
    11. Li, Zerong & Li, Lan & Hui, Mo, 2024. "Fostering green economic growth through sustainable management of natural resources," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. Heni Fitriani & Saheed Ajayi & Sunkuk Kim, 2022. "Analysis of the Underlying Causes of Waste Generation in Indonesia’s Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Zhang, Huining & Dong, Jianping & Wei, Chao & Cao, Caifang & Zhang, Zuotai, 2022. "Future trend of terminal energy conservation in steelmaking plant: Integration of molten slag heat recovery-combustible gas preparation from waste plastics and CO2 emission reduction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    14. Muhammad Ali Musarat & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Nasir Hameed & Dhinaharan R & Abdul Hannan Qureshi & Mohamed Mubarak Abdul Wahab, 2022. "Efficient Construction Waste Management: A Solution through Industrial Revolution (IR) 4.0 Evaluated by AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Ekaterina V. Popova & Nikolay I. Strikh, 2021. "Environmental management practices for the circular economy development in Russia and their impact on the financial performance of companies," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 17-34, April.
    16. Huijie Li & Deqing Tan, 2024. "How to Control Waste Incineration Pollution? Cost-Sharing or Penalty Mechanism—Based on Two Differential Game Models," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 91-109, June.
    17. Gayani Karunasena & Gayan Fernando & Dilogini Ashokkumar & Chunlu Liu, 2023. "Influence of Labour Experience in the Generation of Construction Material Waste in the Sri Lankan Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Yiğit Kazançoğlu & Muhittin Sağnak & Çisem Lafcı & Sunil Luthra & Anil Kumar & Caner Taçoğlu, 2021. "Big Data-Enabled Solutions Framework to Overcoming the Barriers to Circular Economy Initiatives in Healthcare Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Mathivathanan, Deepak & Mathiyazhagan, K. & Khorana, Sangeeta & Rana, Nripendra P. & Arora, Bimal, 2022. "Drivers of circular economy for small and medium enterprises: Case study on the Indian state of Tamil Nadu," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 997-1015.
    20. Muhandiramge Nimashi Navodana Rodrigo & Srinath Perera & Sepani Senaratne & Xiaohua Jin, 2021. "Review of Supply Chain Based Embodied Carbon Estimating Method: A Case Study Based Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:640-:d:478564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.