IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i19p2440-d648217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Using TOPSIS and WSA Method for Quality of Life: The Case of Slovakia Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Jana Coronicova Hurajova

    (Faculty of Business Economy with seat in Košice, University of Economics in Bratislava, Tajovského 13, 041 30 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Zuzana Hajduova

    (Faculty of Business Management, University of Economics in Bratislava, Dolnozemská Cesta 1/b, 852 35 Bratislava 5, Slovakia)

Abstract

Quality of life can be expressed as a highly subjective measure of happiness, which is an important part of many financial and non-financial decisions. The issue of quality of life, namely its quantification, is a current topic, evidenced by a number of literary sources in both foreign and domestic literature. The paper deals with this issue in the conditions of the Slovak Republic and studies the quality of life for each region of Slovakia with respect to the given indicators. In this paper, we deal with the use of the methods of multi-criteria analysis in evaluating the quality of life in Slovakia. The aim of this paper is to highlight that it is important to monitor the level of quality of life at the regional level and that one of the indicators influencing the quality of life in the region may be its location in relation to neighboring countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Jana Coronicova Hurajova & Zuzana Hajduova, 2021. "Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Using TOPSIS and WSA Method for Quality of Life: The Case of Slovakia Regions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-11, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:19:p:2440-:d:648217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/19/2440/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/19/2440/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruut Veenhoven, 2006. "Quality-of-Life in the Modern Society Measured with Happy Life Years," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Yew-Kwang Ng & Lok Sang Ho (ed.), Happiness and Public Policy, chapter 2, pages 19-44, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Roman Lacko & Zuzana Hajduová, 2018. "Determinants of Environmental Efficiency of the EU Countries Using Two-Step DEA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Samira Vakilipour & Abolghasem Sadeghi-Niaraki & Mostafa Ghodousi & Soo-Mi Choi, 2021. "Comparison between Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Evaluating the Quality of Life at Different Spatial Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-36, April.
    4. Pyoungsoo Lee & You-Jin Park, 2017. "Eco-Efficiency Evaluation Considering Environmental Stringency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Duman, Yavuz Selman & Kasman, Adnan, 2018. "Environmental technical efficiency in EU member and candidate countries: A parametric hyperbolic distance function approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 297-307.
    6. Hui Jin & Xinyi Qian & Tachia Chin & Hejie Zhang, 2020. "A Global Assessment of Sustainable Development Based on Modification of the Human Development Index via the Entropy Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Sergi, S. Bruno & D’Aleo, Vittorio & Arbolino, Roberta & Carlucci, Fabio & Barilla, David & Ioppolo, Giuseppe, 2020. "Evaluation of the Italian transport infrastructures: A technical and economic efficiency analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Inna Gryshova & Mykola Kyzym & Viktoriia Khaustova & Volodymyr Korneev & Hennadii Kramarev, 2020. "Assessment of the Industrial Structure and its Influence on Sustainable Economic Development and Quality of Life of the Population of Different World Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Anca Băndoi & Elena Jianu & Maria Enescu & Gheorghe Axinte & Sorin Tudor & Daniela Firoiu, 2020. "The Relationship between Development of Tourism, Quality of Life and Sustainable Performance in EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-24, February.
    10. Min Wang & Xianli Zhao & Qunxi Gong & Zhigeng Ji, 2019. "Measurement of Regional Green Economy Sustainable Development Ability Based on Entropy Weight-Topsis-Coupling Coordination Degree—A Case Study in Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junke Chen & Yifan Liu & Qigang Zhu, 2022. "Enterprise Profitability and Financial Evaluation Model Based on Statistical Modeling: Taking Tencent Music as an Example," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Djula Borozan, 2023. "Institutions and Environmentally Adjusted Efficiency," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4489-4510, December.
    2. Xiaowei Ni & Yongbo Quan, 2023. "Measuring the Sustainable Development of Marine Economy Based on the Entropy Value Method: A Case Study in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Kayode Olaide & Beatrice D. Simo-Kengne & Josine Uwilingiye, 2022. "Sustainable Development–Fiscal Federalism Nexus: A “Beyond GDP” Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-37, May.
    4. Mengtian Zhang & Huiling Wang, 2023. "Evolution of Industrial Ecology and Analysis of Influencing Factors: The Yellow River Basin in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Jia Peng & Xianli Hu & Xinyue Fan & Kai Wang & Hao Gong, 2023. "The Impact of the Green Economy on Carbon Emission Intensity: Comparisons, Challenges, and Mitigating Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Mihai TALMACIU & Irina Teodora MANOLESCU & Stanislav PERCIC, 2020. "The Implications Of European Neighbourhood Policy On Sustainable Development Of Tourism In Eastern European Countries," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 7, pages 9-26.
    7. Chuanlin Ning & Han Wang & Jing Wu & Qinwei Chen & Huacheng Pei & Hao Gao, 2022. "The COVID-19 Vaccination and Vaccine Inequity Worldwide: An Empirical Study Based on Global Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Llorca, Manuel & Rodriguez-Alvarez, Ana, 2024. "Economic, environmental, and energy equity convergence: Evidence of a multi-speed Europe?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    9. Tachia Chin & Francesco Caputo & Yi Shi & Mario Calabrese & Chiraz Aouina‐Mejri & Armando Papa, 2022. "Depicting the role of cross‐cultural legitimacy for responsible innovation in Asian‐Pacific business models: A dialectical systems view of Yin‐Yang harmony," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 2083-2093, November.
    10. Rui Zhang & Yong Ma & Jie Ren, 2022. "Green Development Performance Evaluation Based on Dual Perspectives of Level and Efficiency: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-24, July.
    11. Xin Huang & Juqin Shen & Fuhua Sun & Lunyan Wang & Pengchao Zhang & Yu Wan, 2023. "Study on the Spatial and Temporal Distribution of the High–Quality Development of Urbanization and Water Resource Coupling in the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-26, August.
    12. Asma Fahim & Qingmei Tan & Bushra Naz & Qurat ul Ain & Sibghat Ullah Bazai, 2021. "Sustainable Higher Education Reform Quality Assessment Using SWOT Analysis with Integration of AHP and Entropy Models: A Case Study of Morocco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Liu, Xiao-Yan & Pollitt, Michael G. & Xie, Bai-Chen & Liu, Li-Qiu, 2019. "Does environmental heterogeneity affect the productive efficiency of grid utilities in China?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 333-344.
    14. Teodor Marian Cojocaru & George H. Ionescu & Daniela Firoiu & Laura Mariana Cismaș & Maria Daniela Oțil & Ovidiu Toma, 2022. "Reducing Inequalities within and among EU Countries—Assessing the Achievement of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Targets (SDG 10)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    15. Xincheng Zhu & Yulin Liu & Xin Fang, 2022. "Revisiting the Sustainable Economic Welfare Growth in China: Provincial Assessment Based on the ISEW," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 279-306, July.
    16. Xiangfei Ma & Inna Gryshova & Viktoriia Khaustova & Olena Reshetnyak & Maryna Shcherbata & Denys Bobrovnyk & Mykyta Khaustov, 2022. "Assessment of the Impact of Scientific and Technical Activities on the Economic Growth of World Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-35, November.
    17. Francesco Ciardiello & Andrea Genovese, 2023. "A comparison between TOPSIS and SAW methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 967-994, June.
    18. WANG, Yang & Liu, Dinghan & Sui, Xiuping & Li, Fengchun, 2022. "Does logistics efficiency matter? Evidence from green economic efficiency side," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    19. Zhang, Tao & Li, Hong-Zhou & Xie, Bai-Chen, 2022. "Have renewables and market-oriented reforms constrained the technical efficiency improvement of China's electric grid utilities?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    20. Karetta Timonen & Anu Reinikainen & Sirpa Kurppa & Inkeri Riipi, 2021. "Key Indicators and Social Acceptance for Bioenergy Production Potential as Part of the Green Economy Transition Process in Local Areas of Lapland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:19:p:2440-:d:648217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.