IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p10965-d1192929.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of the Green Economy on Carbon Emission Intensity: Comparisons, Challenges, and Mitigating Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Jia Peng

    (College of Mathematics and Physics, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Xianli Hu

    (College of Mathematics and Physics, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Xinyue Fan

    (College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Kai Wang

    (College of Mathematics and Physics, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Hao Gong

    (College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

Abstract

Global warming, driven primarily by the substantial discharge of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, presents a progressively intensifying concern. To curtail these emissions, the international community is persistently exerting efforts. Traditional economic paradigms have contributed to resource exhaustion and severe pollution, as well as other issues. The green economy, characterized by “eco-friendly”, “low carbon”, and “intensive development” principles, proposes strategies to counter global warming. The current study considers 30 Chinese provinces and cities, assessing coal, coke, and diesel consumption data from 2004 to 2020. Using the carbon emission factor method to quantify carbon emissions, spatial autocorrelation of emissions across various regions is evaluated by employing Moran’s I. The Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression (GTWR) of carbon emissions and green economy is formulated to scrutinize the contributing factors to carbon emissions, focusing on spatial–temporal evolution and spatial heterogeneity. According to the analysis results, the corresponding suggestions are put forward. This also facilitates analysis of the green economy’s impact on China’s carbon peak and carbon neutrality targets. The findings suggest the following: (1) Over the study period, China’s aggregate carbon emissions exhibited an upward trend, although the growth rate notably decelerated after 2011, and significant spatial clustering of carbon emissions was discerned across the regions. (2) Overall, both economic and social development markedly augmented carbon emission intensity. (3) Spatially, the green economy’s effect on carbon emissions demonstrated significant spatial differentiation. By constructing a GTWR model of the green economy–carbon emission relationship, this study provides a trajectory for regional green sustainability and offers empirical guidance for developing countries grappling with global warming.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia Peng & Xianli Hu & Xinyue Fan & Kai Wang & Hao Gong, 2023. "The Impact of the Green Economy on Carbon Emission Intensity: Comparisons, Challenges, and Mitigating Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10965-:d:1192929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10965/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10965/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feng Zhang & Xintian Wang & Xiaojie Liu, 2022. "Research on Functional Value Estimation and Development Mode of Green Infrastructure Based on Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Model: A Case Study of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Wang, Shuhong & Wang, Xiaoqing & Lu, Binbin, 2022. "Is resource abundance a curse for green economic growth? Evidence from developing countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Sharma, Susan Sunila, 2011. "Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: Empirical evidence from 69 countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 376-382, January.
    4. Feipeng Guo & Linji Zhang & Zifan Wang & Shaobo Ji, 2022. "Research on Determining the Critical Influencing Factors of Carbon Emission Integrating GRA with an Improved STIRPAT Model: Taking the Yangtze River Delta as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Grossman, G.M & Krueger, A.B., 1991. "Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement," Papers 158, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Public and International Affairs.
    6. Bin Meng & Guotai Chi, 2018. "Evaluation Index System Of Green Industry Based On Maximum Information Content," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 63(02), pages 229-248, March.
    7. Baofeng Shi & Hufeng Yang & Jing Wang & Jingxu Zhao, 2016. "City Green Economy Evaluation: Empirical Evidence from 15 Sub-Provincial Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-39, June.
    8. Hardt, Lukas & Owen, Anne & Brockway, Paul & Heun, Matthew K. & Barrett, John & Taylor, Peter G. & Foxon, Timothy J., 2018. "Untangling the drivers of energy reduction in the UK productive sectors: Efficiency or offshoring?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 124-133.
    9. Wang, Zhaohua & Yin, Fangchao & Zhang, Yixiang & Zhang, Xian, 2012. "An empirical research on the influencing factors of regional CO2 emissions: Evidence from Beijing city, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 277-284.
    10. Min Wang & Xianli Zhao & Qunxi Gong & Zhigeng Ji, 2019. "Measurement of Regional Green Economy Sustainable Development Ability Based on Entropy Weight-Topsis-Coupling Coordination Degree—A Case Study in Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Xiaodong Hu & Ximing Zhang & Lei Dong & Hujun Li & Zheng He & Huihua Chen, 2022. "Carbon Emission Factors Identification and Measurement Model Construction for Railway Construction Projects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Xingli Wu & Huchang Liao, 2022. "A gained and lost dominance score method with conflict analysis for green economy development evaluation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 623-655, September.
    13. Lihong Wang & Kedong Yin & Yun Cao & Xuemei Li, 2018. "A New Grey Relational Analysis Model Based on the Characteristic of Inscribed Core (IC-GRA) and Its Application on Seven-Pilot Carbon Trading Markets of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Hequ Huang & Jia Zhou, 2022. "Study on the Spatial and Temporal Differentiation Pattern of Carbon Emission and Carbon Compensation in China’s Provincial Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nasreen, Samia & Anwar, Sofia & Ozturk, Ilhan, 2017. "Financial stability, energy consumption and environmental quality: Evidence from South Asian economies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1105-1122.
    2. O.S. Mariev & N.B. Davidson & O.S. Emelianova, 2020. "The Impact of Urbanization on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the Regions of Russia," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 19(3), pages 286-309.
    3. Alvarez-Herranz, Agustin & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Cantos, José María, 2017. "Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 386-397.
    4. Ajanaku, B.A. & Collins, A.R., 2021. "Economic growth and deforestation in African countries: Is the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis applicable?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    5. Joanna Godlewska & Edyta Sidorczuk-Pietraszko, 2019. "Taxonomic Assessment of Transition to the Green Economy in Polish Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-25, September.
    6. Lili Sun & Huijuan Cui & Quansheng Ge, 2021. "Driving Factors and Future Prediction of Carbon Emissions in the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’ Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Halicioglu, Ferda & Ketenci, Natalya, 2015. "The impact of international trade on environmental quality in transition countries: evidence from time series data during 1991-2013," MPRA Paper 71097, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2015.
    8. Arminen, Heli & Menegaki, Angeliki N., 2019. "Corruption, climate and the energy-environment-growth nexus," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 621-634.
    9. Dong Jichang & He Jing & Li Xiuting & Mou Xindi & Dong Zhi, 2020. "The Effect of Industrial Structure Change on Carbon Dioxide Emissions: A Cross-Country Panel Analysis," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Wang, Yuan & Zhang, Xiang & Kubota, Jumpei & Zhu, Xiaodong & Lu, Genfa, 2015. "A semi-parametric panel data analysis on the urbanization-carbon emissions nexus for OECD countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 704-709.
    11. Devleena Chakravarty & Sabuj Kumar Mandal, 2019. "Environmental Kuznets curve for local and global pollutants: application of GMM and random coefficient panel data models," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 21(2), pages 212-233, December.
    12. repec:ipg:wpaper:2014-542 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Nizar Harrathi & Ahmed Almohaimeed, 2022. "Determinants of Carbon Dioxide Emissions: New Empirical Evidence from MENA Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(1), pages 469-482.
    14. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Haouas, Ilham & Hoang, Thi Hong Van, 2019. "Economic growth and environmental degradation in Vietnam: Is the environmental Kuznets curve a complete picture?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 197-218.
    15. Wang, Wei-Zheng & Liu, Lan-Cui & Liao, Hua & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2021. "Impacts of urbanization on carbon emissions: An empirical analysis from OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    16. Miomir Jovanović & Ljiljana Kašćelan & Aleksandra Despotović & Vladimir Kašćelan, 2015. "The Impact of Agro-Economic Factors on GHG Emissions: Evidence from European Developing and Advanced Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Aida Sy & Tony Tinker & Abdelkader Derbali & Lamia Jamel, 2016. "Economic growth, financial development, trade openness, and CO 2 emissions in European countries," African Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 155-179.
    18. Omri, Anis & Nguyen, Duc Khuong & Rault, Christophe, 2014. "Causal interactions between CO2 emissions, FDI, and economic growth: Evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equation models," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 382-389.
    19. Omri, Anis, 2013. "CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth nexus in MENA countries: Evidence from simultaneous equations models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 657-664.
    20. Abid, Mehdi, 2016. "Impact of economic, financial, and institutional factors on CO2 emissions: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa economies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 85-94.
    21. Yin, Jianhua & Zheng, Mingzheng & Chen, Jian, 2015. "The effects of environmental regulation and technical progress on CO2 Kuznets curve: An evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 97-108.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10965-:d:1192929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.