IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1550-d1590547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Housing Conditions and the Quality of Life of the Populations of the European Union Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Oleńczuk-Paszel

    (Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Economics, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, 70-210 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Sompolska-Rzechuła

    (Department of Mathematical Applications in Economy, Faculty of Economics, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, 71-270 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

Quality of life (QoL) as a category, which is an overarching goal of sustainable development, dependent on many factors both objective and subjective, should be subjected to constant monitoring in various spatial, temporal and thematic arrangements. This study assesses the spatial differentiation of European Union countries in terms of QoL and housing conditions (HCs) of their populations. Interactions between the studied phenomena were also determined. A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method—the TOPSIS method—and Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to achieve the objectives of this study. The analysis was conducted using 2019 and 2022 data from the Eurostat database (including the EU-SILC survey) and TheGlobalEconomy.com. The research showed that the housing conditions and QoL of the populations of EU countries vary spatially, being more favorable in Austria, Ireland and Slovenia and the Scandinavian countries of Denmark, Finland and Sweden and less favorable in Greece and some of the countries that joined the EU in 2004 and in 2007, viz. Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania. This study noted a very strong positive correlation between the positions of countries in the rankings created with QoL in 2019 and 2022 (0.947) and with living conditions in the years under study (0.828), as well as a rather weak correlation between QoL and HCs in both 2019 (0.272) and 2022 (0.292). This article fills a research gap because, to our knowledge, the indicated phenomena have not been analyzed to date in the contexts presented in this article.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Oleńczuk-Paszel & Agnieszka Sompolska-Rzechuła, 2025. "Housing Conditions and the Quality of Life of the Populations of the European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1550-:d:1590547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1550/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1550/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walther, Lena & Fuchs, Lukas M. & Schupp, Jürgen & Scheve, Christian von, 2020. "Living Conditions and the Mental Health and Well-being of Refugees : Evidence from a Large-Scale German Survey," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 22, pages 903-913.
    2. Gundi Knies & Patricia C Melo & Min Zhang, 2021. "Neighbourhood deprivation, life satisfaction and earnings: Comparative analyses of neighbourhood effects at bespoke scales," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(13), pages 2640-2659, October.
    3. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera, 2022. "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Era on Residential Property Features: Pilot Studies in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Talita Greyling & Fiona Tregenna, 2020. "Quality of life: Validation of an instrument and analysis of relationships between domains," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 19-39, January.
    5. Frank Andrews & Aubrey McKennell, 1980. "Measures of self-reported well-being: their affective, cognitive, and other components," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 127-155, June.
    6. Jana Coronicova Hurajova & Zuzana Hajduova, 2021. "Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Using TOPSIS and WSA Method for Quality of Life: The Case of Slovakia Regions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-11, October.
    7. Giovanna Galeota Lanza & Mattia De Martino, 2022. "Urban Housing Inequity: Housing Deprivation and Social Response in the City of Naples," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, January.
    8. Costanza, Robert & Fisher, Brendan & Ali, Saleem & Beer, Caroline & Bond, Lynne & Boumans, Roelof & Danigelis, Nicholas L. & Dickinson, Jennifer & Elliott, Carolyn & Farley, Joshua & Gayer, Diane Elli, 2007. "Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 267-276, March.
    9. Zan Yang & Yuqi Fu, 2019. "Physical Attributes of Housing and Elderly Health: A New Dynamic Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Zhen Shi & Yingju Wu & Yung‐ho Chiu & Qinghua Pang & Lina Zhang, 2023. "Assessing city sustainable development—Residents' quality of life from the perspective of sustainable development goals and spatiotemporal evolution," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1456-1474, June.
    11. Anna Galik & Monika Bąk & Katarzyna Bałandynowicz-Panfil & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2022. "Evaluating Labour Market Flexibility Using the TOPSIS Method: Sustainable Industrial Relations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Hanna Dudek & Agnieszka Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska, 2024. "Dimensions of Housing Deprivation in Poland: A Rural-Urban Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, October.
    13. Małgorzata Ćwiek & Paweł Ulman & Maria Sadko, 2024. "Evaluation of housing conditions in Europe using the TOPSIS method," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 3, pages 275-298.
    14. Sen, Amartya, 1995. "Inequality Reexamined," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198289289.
    15. Juan Martín & Cira Mendoza, 2013. "A DEA Approach to Measure the Quality-of-Life in the Municipalities of the Canary Islands," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(1), pages 335-353, August.
    16. Huang, Qiu & Lin, Silu & Guo, Yizhuo, 2024. "Can energy transition improve the quality of life for the population?–Empirical analysis of 30 provinces in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    17. Sławomira Hajduk & Dorota Jelonek, 2021. "A Decision-Making Approach Based on TOPSIS Method for Ranking Smart Cities in the Context of Urban Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, May.
    18. Ludger Niemann & Thomas Hoppe, 2021. "How to Sustain Sustainability Monitoring in Cities: Lessons from 49 Community Indicator Initiatives across 10 Latin American Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, May.
    19. Carla Alexandra Filipe Amado & Ana Paula Barreira & Sérgio Pereira Santos & Maria Helena Guimarães, 2019. "Comparing the quality of life of cities that gained and lost population: An assessment with DEA and the Malmquist index," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 98(5), pages 2075-2097, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bajmócy, Zoltán & Gébert, Judit, 2014. "The outlines of innovation policy in the capability approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 93-102.
    2. Jadwiga Adamczyk & Magdalena Adamczyk-Kowalczuk, 2022. "What Do They Feel, Do, and Expect? The Young Generation’s Perception of Environmental Problems and Sustainable Development Goals in the Context of Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Rajko Tomaš, 2022. "Measurement of the Concentration of Potential Quality of Life in Local Communities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 79-109, August.
    4. Anna Kovacs-Györi & Pablo Cabrera-Barona & Bernd Resch & Michael Mehaffy & Thomas Blaschke, 2019. "Assessing and Representing Livability through the Analysis of Residential Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Jaschke Philipp & Sulin Sardoschau & Marco Tabellini, 2021. "Scared Straight? Threat and Assimilation of Refugees in Germany," RF Berlin - CReAM Discussion Paper Series 2136, Rockwool Foundation Berlin (RF Berlin) - Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM).
    6. Yu-Chuan Chen & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang & Tai-Yu Lin, 2023. "Sustainable Development, Government Efficiency, and People’s Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1549-1578, April.
    7. Jean Ryan, 2020. "Examining the Process of Modal Choice for Everyday Travel Among Older People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Víctor Pérez & Alain Hernández & Flor Guerrero & María Amparo León & Christian Luiz Silva & Rafael Caballero, 2016. "Sustainability Ranking for Cuban Tourist Destinations Based on Composite Indexes," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(1), pages 425-444, October.
    9. Myria Georgiou, 2003. "Mapping diasporic media across the EU: addressing cultural exclusion," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 26420, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Tomas Hanell, 2022. "Unmet Aspirations and Urban Malaise," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 83-103, November.
    11. Samy Katumba & Julia Kadt & Mark Orkin & Paul Fatti, 2022. "Construction of a Reflective Quality of Life Index for Gauteng Province in South Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 373-408, November.
    12. Beata Bieszk-Stolorz & Krzysztof Dmytrów, 2022. "Assessment of the Similarity of the Situation in the EU Labour Markets and Their Changes in the Face of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Aparna Nair, 2019. "Vaccinating against Vasoori: Eradicating smallpox in the ‘model’ princely state of Travancore, 1804–1946," The Indian Economic & Social History Review, , vol. 56(4), pages 361-386, October.
    14. José Sobreiro Filho & Enzo Barberio Mariano & Vinicius Amorim Sobreiro & Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour, 2016. "Beyond the Agrarian Reform Policies in Brazil: An Empirical Study of Brazilian States from 1995 Through 2011," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(3), pages 1093-1114, December.
    15. Keita, Sekou & Schewe, Paul, 2021. "Out of sight, out of mind? Terror in the home country, family reunification options, and the well-being of refugees," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    16. Zhenhua Zheng & Hong Chen & Junling Gao, 2021. "Age Differences in the Influence of Residential Environment and Behavior on the Life Quality of Older Adults: The Transfer from Physical-Environment to Social-Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-14, January.
    17. Bieling, Claudia & Plieninger, Tobias & Pirker, Heidemarie & Vogl, Christian R., 2014. "Linkages between landscapes and human well-being: An empirical exploration with short interviews," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 19-30.
    18. O'Donnell, Gus & Oswald, Andrew J., 2015. "National well-being policy and a weighted approach to human feelings," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 59-70.
    19. Zhenzhen Qin & Yao Song, 2020. "The Sacred Power of Beauty: Examining the Perceptual Effect of Buddhist Symbols on Happiness and Life Satisfaction in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, April.
    20. Claborn, Kelly A. & Brooks, Jeremy S., 2019. "Can We Consume Less and Gain More? Environmental Efficiency of Well-being at the Individual Level," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 110-120.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1550-:d:1590547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.