IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i16p1861-d609308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Epidemic Spread among a Commuting Population Using Transport Schemes

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Calvetti

    (Department of Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, and Statistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA)

  • Alexander P. Hoover

    (Department of Mathematics, University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325, USA)

  • Johnie Rose

    (Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA)

  • Erkki Somersalo

    (Department of Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, and Statistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA)

Abstract

Understanding the dynamics of the spread of COVID-19 between connected communities is fundamental in planning appropriate mitigation measures. To that end, we propose and analyze a novel metapopulation network model, particularly suitable for modeling commuter traffic patterns, that takes into account the connectivity between a heterogeneous set of communities, each with its own infection dynamics. In the novel metapopulation model that we propose here, transport schemes developed in optimal transport theory provide an efficient and easily implementable way of describing the temporary population redistribution due to traffic, such as the daily commuter traffic between work and residence. Locally, infection dynamics in individual communities are described in terms of a susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered (SEIR) compartment model, modified to account for the specific features of COVID-19, most notably its spread by asymptomatic and presymptomatic infected individuals. The mathematical foundation of our metapopulation network model is akin to a transport scheme between two population distributions, namely the residential distribution and the workplace distribution, whose interface can be inferred from commuter mobility data made available by the US Census Bureau. We use the proposed metapopulation model to test the dynamics of the spread of COVID-19 on two networks, a smaller one comprising 7 counties in the Greater Cleveland area in Ohio, and a larger one consisting of 74 counties in the Pittsburgh–Cleveland–Detroit corridor following the Lake Erie’s American coastline. The model simulations indicate that densely populated regions effectively act as amplifiers of the infection for the surrounding, less densely populated areas, in agreement with the pattern of infections observed in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. Computed examples show that the model can be used also to test different mitigation strategies, including one based on state-level travel restrictions, another on county level triggered social distancing, as well as a combination of the two.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Calvetti & Alexander P. Hoover & Johnie Rose & Erkki Somersalo, 2021. "Modeling Epidemic Spread among a Commuting Population Using Transport Schemes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-26, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:16:p:1861-:d:609308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/16/1861/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/16/1861/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paolo Bajardi & Chiara Poletto & Jose J Ramasco & Michele Tizzoni & Vittoria Colizza & Alessandro Vespignani, 2011. "Human Mobility Networks, Travel Restrictions, and the Global Spread of 2009 H1N1 Pandemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hakan Yilmazkuday, 2021. "Welfare costs of COVID‐19: Evidence from US counties," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 826-848, September.
    2. Wang, Weihong & Chen, MingMing & Min, Yong & Jin, Xiaogang, 2016. "Structural diversity effects of multilayer networks on the threshold of interacting epidemics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 443(C), pages 254-262.
    3. Hartwell, Christopher A., 2021. "What Drove the First Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic? The Role of Institutions and Leader Attributes," MPRA Paper 110563, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Eugenio Valdano & Chiara Poletto & Armando Giovannini & Diana Palma & Lara Savini & Vittoria Colizza, 2015. "Predicting Epidemic Risk from Past Temporal Contact Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Xiaoyan Mu & Anthony Gar-On Yeh & Xiaohu Zhang, 2021. "The interplay of spatial spread of COVID-19 and human mobility in the urban system of China during the Chinese New Year," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(7), pages 1955-1971, September.
    6. Panayotis Christidis & Aris Christodoulou, 2020. "The Predictive Capacity of Air Travel Patterns during the Global Spread of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Risk, Uncertainty and Randomness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Jürgen Hackl & Thibaut Dubernet, 2019. "Epidemic Spreading in Urban Areas Using Agent-Based Transportation Models," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Wang, Wenjun & Pan, Lin & Yuan, Ning & Zhang, Sen & Liu, Dong, 2015. "A comparative analysis of intra-city human mobility by taxi," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 420(C), pages 134-147.
    9. Sheng Wei & Lei Wang, 2020. "Examining the population flow network in China and its implications for epidemic control based on Baidu migration data," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Mattia Mazzoli & Riccardo Gallotti & Filippo Privitera & Pere Colet & José J. Ramasco, 2023. "Spatial immunization to abate disease spreading in transportation hubs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Thombre, Anurag & Agarwal, Amit, 2021. "A paradigm shift in urban mobility: Policy insights from travel before and after COVID-19 to seize the opportunity," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 335-353.
    12. Gregory Price & Eric van Holm, 2021. "The Effect of Social Distancing on the Early Spread of the Novel Coronavirus," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(5), pages 2331-2340, September.
    13. Glaser, Meredith & Krizek, Kevin J., 2021. "Can street-focused emergency response measures trigger a transition to new transport systems? Exploring evidence and lessons from 55 US cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 146-155.
    14. Borkowski, Przemysław & Jażdżewska-Gutta, Magdalena & Szmelter-Jarosz, Agnieszka, 2021. "Lockdowned: Everyday mobility changes in response to COVID-19," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    15. Yuan Li Liu & Kai Zhu & Qi Yao Chen & Jing Li & Jin Cai & Tian He & He Ping Liao, 2021. "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Farm Households’ Vulnerability to Multidimensional Poverty in Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    16. Hakan Yilmazkuday, 2020. "COVID-19 Spread and Inter-County Travel: Daily Evidence from the U.S," Working Papers 2007, Florida International University, Department of Economics.
    17. Fang, Hanming & Wang, Long & Yang, Yang, 2020. "Human mobility restrictions and the spread of the Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    18. Xingyuan Yao, 2021. "COVID-19 Pandemic and economic stimulus policy inequality: evidence from quasi-natural experiments," Working Papers 585, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    19. Salesi, Vinolia Kilinaivoni & Kan Tsui, Wai Hong & Fu, Xiaowen & Gilbey, Andrew, 2022. "Strategies for South Pacific Region to address future pandemics: Implications for the aviation and tourism sectors based on a systematic literature review (2010–2021)," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 107-126.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:16:p:1861-:d:609308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.