IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i20p3222-d1498849.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do We Analyze the Accident Causation of Shield Construction of Water Conveyance Tunnels? A Method Based on the N-K Model and Complex Network

Author

Listed:
  • Yong Zhang

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Qi Zhang

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Xiang Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China)

  • Meng Li

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Guoqing Qi

    (Hanjiang-to-Weihe River Valley Water Diversion Project Construction Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710100, China)

Abstract

In the construction of water conveyance tunnels with the shield method, accidents have occurred from time to time, such as collapses and explosions, and it is of practical significance to explore the cause mechanism of the accident. However, previous research has not considered the effects of dependence between risks on the risk spread. In response, we propose a method based on the Natural Killing Model (the N-K Model) and complex network theory to analyze the cause of shield construction accidents in water conveyance tunnels. By deeply exploring the transmission mechanism and action intensity between system risks, this method can scientifically clarify the accident cause mechanism and provide support for engineering construction safety management. The method constructs a risk index system. Secondly, we introduce the N-K model to reveal the risk coupling mechanism. Then, based on complex network theory, we construct the incident causation model and revise the node’s centrality with the coupling value. Finally, the network topology parameters are calculated to quantitatively describe the causal characteristics of accidents, revealing the risk evolution process and critical causes. The research results indicate that the key causes of accidents are failure to construct according to regulations, inadequate emergency measures, poor ability of judgment and decision-making, and insufficient understanding of abnormal situations. The front end of critical links is subject to human or management risks and should be carefully controlled during construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong Zhang & Qi Zhang & Xiang Zhang & Meng Li & Guoqing Qi, 2024. "How Do We Analyze the Accident Causation of Shield Construction of Water Conveyance Tunnels? A Method Based on the N-K Model and Complex Network," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-30, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:20:p:3222-:d:1498849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/20/3222/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/20/3222/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhou, Ying & Li, Chenshuang & Ding, Lieyun & Sekula, Przemyslaw & Love, Peter E.D. & Zhou, Cheng, 2019. "Combining association rules mining with complex networks to monitor coupled risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 194-208.
    2. Ibsen Chivatá Cárdenas & Saad S.H. Al‐jibouri & Johannes I.M. Halman & Frits A. van Tol, 2013. "Capturing and Integrating Knowledge for Managing Risks in Tunnel Works," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 92-108, January.
    3. Zhou, Jin & Xu, Weixiang & Guo, Xin & Ding, Jing, 2015. "A method for modeling and analysis of directed weighted accident causation network (DWACN)," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 437(C), pages 263-277.
    4. Hai, Nan & Gong, Daqing & Liu, Shifeng & Dai, Zixuan, 2022. "Dynamic coupling risk assessment model of utility tunnels based on multimethod fusion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Yutong Xue & Pengcheng Xiang & Fuyuan Jia & Zhaowen Liu, 2020. "Risk Assessment of High-Speed Rail Projects: A Risk Coupling Model Based on System Dynamics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-27, July.
    6. Jie Liu & Liting Wan & Wanqing Wang & Guanding Yang & Qian Ma & Haowen Zhou & Huyun Zhao & Feng Lu, 2023. "Integrated Fuzzy DEMATEL-ISM-NK for Metro Operation Safety Risk Factor Analysis and Multi-Factor Risk Coupling Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-26, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xue, Gang & Liu, Shifeng & Ren, Long & Gong, Daqing, 2024. "Risk assessment of utility tunnels through risk interaction-based deep learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    2. Fu, Lipeng & Wang, Xueqing & Zhao, Heng & Li, Mengnan, 2022. "Interactions among safety risks in metro deep foundation pit projects: An association rule mining-based modeling framework," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    3. Ibsen Chivatá Cárdenas & Saad S. H. Al‐Jibouri & Johannes I. M. Halman & Wim van de Linde & Frank Kaalberg, 2014. "Using Prior Risk‐Related Knowledge to Support Risk Management Decisions: Lessons Learnt from a Tunneling Project," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(10), pages 1923-1943, October.
    4. Ibsen Chivatá Cárdenas & Saad S.H. Al‐Jibouri & Johannes I.M. Halman & Frits A. van Tol, 2014. "Modeling Risk‐Related Knowledge in Tunneling Projects," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 323-339, February.
    5. Wang, Wenhao & Wang, Yanhui & Wang, Guangxing & Li, Man & Jia, Limin, 2023. "Identification of the critical accident causative factors in the urban rail transit system by complex network theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 610(C).
    6. Ming Fang & Yi Zhang & Mengjue Zhu & Shaopei Chen, 2022. "Cause Mechanism of Metro Collapse Accident Based on Risk Coupling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Wasim ul Rehman & Faryal Jalil & Omur Saltik & Suleyman Degirmen & Mustafa Bekmezci, 2024. "Leveraging Strategic Innovation and Process Capabilities for Intellectual Capital Initiative Performance of Higher Education Institutes (HEIs): A Knowledge-Based Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4161-4202, March.
    8. Gaogeng Zhu & Guoming Chen & Jingyu Zhu & Xiangkun Meng & Xinhong Li, 2022. "Modeling the Evolution of Major Storm-Disaster-Induced Accidents in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-27, June.
    9. Wang, Fan & Li, Heng & Dong, Chao & Ding, Lieyun, 2019. "Knowledge representation using non-parametric Bayesian networks for tunneling risk analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Suo Qi & Wang Liyuan & Yao Tianzi & Wang Zihao, 2021. "Promoting Metro Operation Safety by Exploring Metro Operation Accident Network," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 455-468, August.
    11. Lan, He & Ma, Xiaoxue & Qiao, Weiliang & Ma, Laihao, 2022. "On the causation of seafarers’ unsafe acts using grounded theory and association rule," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    12. Guo, Shengyu & Zhou, Xinyu & Tang, Bing & Gong, Peisong, 2020. "Exploring the behavioral risk chains of accidents using complex network theory in the construction industry," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    13. Liu, Wenli & Li, Ang & Fang, Weili & Love, Peter E.D. & Hartmann, Timo & Luo, Hanbin, 2023. "A hybrid data-driven model for geotechnical reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    14. Jintao Liu & Keping Li & Wei Zheng & Jiebei Zhu, 2019. "An importance order analysis method for causes of railway signaling system hazards based on complex networks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 567-579, August.
    15. Han-Hsiang Wang & Jieh-Haur Chen & Achmad Muhyidin Arifai & Masoud Gheisari, 2022. "Exploring Empirical Rules for Construction Accident Prevention Based on Unsafe Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-9, March.
    16. Wang, Qianlin & Han, Jiaqi & Chen, Feng & Hu, Su & Yun, Cheng & Dou, Zhan & Yan, Tingjun & Yang, Guoan, 2024. "Modeling risk characterization networks for chemical processes based on multi-variate data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    17. Ma, Xiaoxue & Deng, Wanyi & Qiao, Weiliang & Lan, He, 2022. "A methodology to quantify the risk propagation of hazardous events for ship grounding accidents based on directed CN," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    18. Limao Zhang & Xianguo Wu & Yawei Qin & Miroslaw J. Skibniewski & Wenli Liu, 2016. "Towards a Fuzzy Bayesian Network Based Approach for Safety Risk Analysis of Tunnel‐Induced Pipeline Damage," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 278-301, February.
    19. Sun, Bin & Li, Yan & Zhang, Yangyang & Guo, Tong, 2024. "Multi-source heterogeneous data fusion prediction technique for the utility tunnel fire detection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    20. Guo, Yajuan & Yang, Licai & Hao, Shenxue & Gao, Jun, 2019. "Dynamic identification of urban traffic congestion warning communities in heterogeneous networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 522(C), pages 98-111.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:20:p:3222-:d:1498849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.