IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i12p7216-d837337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the Evolution of Major Storm-Disaster-Induced Accidents in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Gaogeng Zhu

    (Centre for Offshore Engineering and Safety Technology (COEST), China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Guoming Chen

    (Centre for Offshore Engineering and Safety Technology (COEST), China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Jingyu Zhu

    (Centre for Offshore Engineering and Safety Technology (COEST), China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Xiangkun Meng

    (Navigation College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Xinhong Li

    (College of Resources Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

Abstract

Storm disasters are the most common cause of accidents in offshore oil and gas industries. To prevent accidents resulting from storms, it is vital to analyze accident propagation and to learn about accident mechanism from previous accidents. In this paper, a novel risk analysis framework is proposed for systematically identifying and analyzing the evolution of accident causes. First, accident causal factors are identified and coded based on grounded theory (GT). Then, decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) is integrated with interpretative structural modeling (ISM) to establish accident evolution hierarchy. Finally, complex networks (CN) are developed to analyze the evolution process of accidents. Compared to reported works, the contribution is threefold: (1) the demand for expert knowledge and personnel subjective influence are reduced through the data induction of accident cases; (2) the method of establishing influence matrix and interaction matrix is improved according to the accident frequency analysis; (3) a hybrid algorithm that can calculate multiple shortest paths of accident evolution under the same node pair is proposed. This method provides a new idea for step-by-step assessment of the accident evolution process, which weakens the subjectivity of traditional methods and achieves quantitative assessment of the importance of accident evolution nodes. The proposed method is demonstrated and validated by a case study of major offshore oil and gas industry accidents caused by storm disasters. Results show that there are five key nodes and five critical paths in the process of accident evolution. Through targeted prevention and control of these nodes and paths, the average shortest path length of the accident evolution network is increased by 35.19%, and the maximum global efficiency decreases by 20.12%. This indicates that the proposed method has broad applicability and can effectively reduce operational risk, so that it can guide actual offshore oil and gas operations during storm disasters.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaogeng Zhu & Guoming Chen & Jingyu Zhu & Xiangkun Meng & Xinhong Li, 2022. "Modeling the Evolution of Major Storm-Disaster-Induced Accidents in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7216-:d:837337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7216/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7216/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Qingfeng & Sun, Xu, 2017. "Crude oil price: Demand, supply, economic activity, economic policy uncertainty and wars – From the perspective of structural equation modelling (SEM)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 483-490.
    2. Misuri, Alessio & Casson Moreno, Valeria & Quddus, Noor & Cozzani, Valerio, 2019. "Lessons learnt from the impact of hurricane Harvey on the chemical and process industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Wang, Zhuoyang & Hill, David J. & Chen, Guo & Dong, Zhao Yang, 2017. "Power system cascading risk assessment based on complex network theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 482(C), pages 532-543.
    4. Zhou, Ying & Li, Chenshuang & Ding, Lieyun & Sekula, Przemyslaw & Love, Peter E.D. & Zhou, Cheng, 2019. "Combining association rules mining with complex networks to monitor coupled risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 194-208.
    5. Ana Cruz & Elisabeth Krausmann, 2013. "Vulnerability of the oil and gas sector to climate change and extreme weather events," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(1), pages 41-53, November.
    6. Wu, Wei-Shing & Yang, Chen-Feng & Chang, Jung-Chuan & Château, Pierre-Alexandre & Chang, Yang-Chi, 2015. "Risk assessment by integrating interpretive structural modeling and Bayesian network, case of offshore pipeline project," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 515-524.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Misuri, Alessio & Ricci, Federica & Sorichetti, Riccardo & Cozzani, Valerio, 2023. "The Effect of Safety Barrier Degradation on the Severity of Primary Natech Scenarios," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Zhang, Zhikai & Wang, Yudong & Xiao, Jihong & Zhang, Yaojie, 2023. "Not all geopolitical shocks are alike: Identifying price dynamics in the crude oil market under tensions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Beyza, Jesus & Ruiz-Paredes, Hector F. & Garcia-Paricio, Eduardo & Yusta, Jose M., 2020. "Assessing the criticality of interdependent power and gas systems using complex networks and load flow techniques," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    4. Qazi, Abroon & Dickson, Alex & Quigley, John & Gaudenzi, Barbara, 2018. "Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-42.
    5. Chen, Chao & Yang, Ming & Reniers, Genserik, 2021. "A dynamic stochastic methodology for quantifying HAZMAT storage resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    6. Bakhsh, Satar & Zhang, Wei, 2023. "How does natural resource price volatility affect economic performance? A threshold effect of economic policy uncertainty," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Jun Wen & Samia Khalid & Hamid Mahmood & Xiuyun Yang, 2022. "Economic policy uncertainty and growth nexus in Pakistan: a new evidence using NARDL model," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 1701-1715, August.
    8. Lin, Boqiang & Bai, Rui, 2021. "Oil prices and economic policy uncertainty: Evidence from global, oil importers, and exporters’ perspective," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    9. Ming Fang & Yi Zhang & Mengjue Zhu & Shaopei Chen, 2022. "Cause Mechanism of Metro Collapse Accident Based on Risk Coupling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Lan Bai & Xiafei Li & Yu Wei & Guiwu Wei, 2022. "Does crude oil futures price really help to predict spot oil price? New evidence from density forecasting," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3694-3712, July.
    11. Chunchang Zhang & Hu Sun & Yuanyuan Zhang & Gen Li & Shibo Li & Junyu Chang & Gongqian Shi, 2023. "Fire Accident Risk Analysis of Lithium Battery Energy Storage Systems during Maritime Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-12, September.
    12. Kraidi, Layth & Shah, Raj & Matipa, Wilfred & Borthwick, Fiona, 2019. "Analyzing the critical risk factors associated with oil and gas pipeline projects in Iraq," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 14-22.
    13. Nicholas Santella, 2023. "Climate related trends in US hazardous material releases caused by natural hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(1), pages 735-756, January.
    14. Yin, Yuanbo & Yang, Hao & Duan, Pengfei & Li, Luling & Zio, Enrico & Liu, Cuiwei & Li, Yuxing, 2022. "Improved quantitative risk assessment of a natural gas pipeline considering high-consequence areas," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    15. Shengyu Guo & Jiali He & Jichao Li & Bing Tang, 2019. "Exploring the Impact of Unsafe Behaviors on Building Construction Accidents Using a Bayesian Network," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Yong Jiang & Yi-Shuai Ren & Chao-Qun Ma & Jiang-Long Liu & Basil Sharp, 2018. "Does the price of strategic commodities respond to U.S. Partisan Conflict?," Papers 1810.08396, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2020.
    17. An Cheng & Tonghui Chen & Guogang Jiang & Xinru Han, 2021. "Can Major Public Health Emergencies Affect Changes in International Oil Prices?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Basel Maraqa & Murad Bein, 2020. "Dynamic Interrelationship and Volatility Spillover among Sustainability Stock Markets, Major European Conventional Indices, and International Crude Oil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, May.
    19. Liu, Wenli & Li, Ang & Fang, Weili & Love, Peter E.D. & Hartmann, Timo & Luo, Hanbin, 2023. "A hybrid data-driven model for geotechnical reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    20. Jiang, Lan & Jiang, Hua, 2023. "Analysis of predictions considering mineral prices, residential energy, and environmental risk: Evidence from the USA in COP 26 perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7216-:d:837337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.