IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i16p2576-d1460310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of Fault-Tolerant Control Methods for Suspension Systems: From Road Vehicles to Maglev Trains

Author

Listed:
  • Fei Ni

    (Maglev Transportation Engineering R&D Center, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Yifan Luo

    (Institute of Rail Transit, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Junqi Xu

    (Maglev Transportation Engineering R&D Center, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Dachuan Liu

    (Institute of Rail Transit, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Yougang Sun

    (Institute of Rail Transit, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Wen Ji

    (Maglev Transportation Engineering R&D Center, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

Abstract

Road vehicles and maglev trains have garnered significant attention, with their suspension systems being crucial for safe and stable performance. However, these systems can be compromised by faults such as sensor and actuator failures, posing risks to stability and safety. This review explores fault-tolerant controls for suspension systems, driven by the need to enhance fault tolerance in such scenarios. We examine the dynamic similarities between the semi-active/active suspension systems in road vehicles and the suspension systems in maglev trains, offering a comprehensive summary of fault-tolerant control strategies for both. Our analysis covers the histories, technical characteristics, fundamentals, modeling, mathematical derivations, and control objectives of both systems. The review categorizes fault-tolerant control methods into hardware redundancy, passive fault-tolerant control, and active fault-tolerant control. We evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of these strategies and propose future directions for the development of fault-tolerant control in suspension systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Fei Ni & Yifan Luo & Junqi Xu & Dachuan Liu & Yougang Sun & Wen Ji, 2024. "Review of Fault-Tolerant Control Methods for Suspension Systems: From Road Vehicles to Maglev Trains," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-41, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:16:p:2576-:d:1460310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/16/2576/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/16/2576/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. Michail & A.C. Zolotas & R.M. Goodall & J.F. Whidborne, 2012. "Optimised configuration of sensors for fault tolerant control of an electro-magnetic suspension system," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(10), pages 1785-1804.
    2. Zio, E., 2009. "Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 125-141.
    3. Hehong Zhang & Yunde Xie & Zhiqiang Long, 2015. "Fault Detection Based on Tracking Differentiator Applied on the Suspension System of Maglev Train," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-9, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asadzadeh, S.M. & Azadeh, A., 2014. "An integrated systemic model for optimization of condition-based maintenance with human error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 117-131.
    2. Rajkumar Bhimgonda Patil & Basavraj S Kothavale & Laxman Yadu Waghmode, 2019. "Selection of time-to-failure model for computerized numerical control turning center based on the assessment of trends in maintenance data," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 105-117, April.
    3. Rodrigo Andrade & Somayeh Moazeni & Jose Emmanuel Ramirez‐Marquez, 2020. "A systems perspective on contact centers and customer service reliability modeling," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(2), pages 221-236, March.
    4. Phan, Hieu Chi & Dhar, Ashutosh Sutra & Bui, Nang Duc, 2023. "Reliability assessment of pipelines crossing strike-slip faults considering modeling uncertainties using ANN models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    5. Rocchetta, Roberto & Crespo, Luis G., 2021. "A scenario optimization approach to reliability-based and risk-based design: Soft-constrained modulation of failure probability bounds," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    6. Niu, Gang & Yang, Bo-Suk & Pecht, Michael, 2010. "Development of an optimized condition-based maintenance system by data fusion and reliability-centered maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 786-796.
    7. Teng, Kuei-Yung & Thekdi, Shital A. & Lambert, James H., 2012. "Identification and evaluation of priorities in the business process of a risk or safety organization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 74-86.
    8. Ibsen Chivatá Cárdenas & Saad S.H. Al‐Jibouri & Johannes I.M. Halman & Frits A. van Tol, 2014. "Modeling Risk‐Related Knowledge in Tunneling Projects," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 323-339, February.
    9. García Nieto, P.J. & García-Gonzalo, E. & Sánchez Lasheras, F. & de Cos Juez, F.J., 2015. "Hybrid PSO–SVM-based method for forecasting of the remaining useful life for aircraft engines and evaluation of its reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 219-231.
    10. Zio, E., 2018. "The future of risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 176-190.
    11. Salomon, Julian & Winnewisser, Niklas & Wei, Pengfei & Broggi, Matteo & Beer, Michael, 2021. "Efficient reliability analysis of complex systems in consideration of imprecision," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    12. Kaya, Gulsum Kubra & Hocaoglu, Mehmet Fatih, 2020. "Semi-quantitative application to the Functional Resonance Analysis Method for supporting safety management in a complex health-care process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    13. Senderov, Sergey M. & Smirnova, Elena M. & Vorobev, Sergey V., 2020. "Analysis of vulnerability of fuel supply systems in gas-consuming regions due to failure of critical gas industry facilities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    14. Hu, Bin & Seiler, Peter, 2015. "Pivotal decomposition for reliability analysis of fault tolerant control systems on unmanned aerial vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 130-141.
    15. Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 137-150.
    16. Baraldi, Piero & Podofillini, Luca & Mkrtchyan, Lusine & Zio, Enrico & Dang, Vinh N., 2015. "Comparing the treatment of uncertainty in Bayesian networks and fuzzy expert systems used for a human reliability analysis application," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 176-193.
    17. Jesús Ferrero Bermejo & Juan Francisco Gómez Fernández & Rafael Pino & Adolfo Crespo Márquez & Antonio Jesús Guillén López, 2019. "Review and Comparison of Intelligent Optimization Modelling Techniques for Energy Forecasting and Condition-Based Maintenance in PV Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Edward J. Oughton & Daniel Ralph & Raghav Pant & Eireann Leverett & Jennifer Copic & Scott Thacker & Rabia Dada & Simon Ruffle & Michelle Tuveson & Jim W Hall, 2019. "Stochastic Counterfactual Risk Analysis for the Vulnerability Assessment of Cyber‐Physical Attacks on Electricity Distribution Infrastructure Networks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 2012-2031, September.
    19. Wu, Xuedong & Chang, Yanchao & Mao, Jianxu & Du, Zhaoping, 2013. "Predicting reliability and failures of engine systems by single multiplicative neuron model with iterated nonlinear filters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 244-250.
    20. Wei, Zhao & Tao, Tao & ZhuoShu, Ding & Zio, Enrico, 2013. "A dynamic particle filter-support vector regression method for reliability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 109-116.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:16:p:2576-:d:1460310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.