IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v237y2023ics0951832023002855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability assessment of pipelines crossing strike-slip faults considering modeling uncertainties using ANN models

Author

Listed:
  • Phan, Hieu Chi
  • Dhar, Ashutosh Sutra
  • Bui, Nang Duc

Abstract

Buried pipelines are crucial infrastructure that sometimes suffers from the adverse effects of ground movements resulting from the earthquake. A pipe crossing strike-slip fault can experience high tensile or compressive strains due to fault displacement during the earthquake. Various analytical and numerical methods are available in the literature to calculate the pipe wall strain through modeling the pipe-soil interaction. These methods are often too complex and not suitable for performing extensive parametric studies. In this research, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based methods were developed for calculating the peak tensile and peak compressive strains. Due to the lack of field data, finite element analysis was performed to investigate the complex behavior of pipe under the fault movements and generate a database to develop the ANN models. The study revealed the weakness of ANN models that although a very high coefficient of determination (i.e., R2 ≈ 1) and low error can be obtained, the strains predicted using these models can significantly be different from the actual strains due to model uncertainty. To this end, the random strains were predicted by adding the calculated strains with the randomized model errors. Using the random strains, calculating the probability of exceedance of strains was proposed. Finally, a framework is developed for failure probability assessment of pipelines subjected to fault movements accounting to the uncertainty of ANN models.

Suggested Citation

  • Phan, Hieu Chi & Dhar, Ashutosh Sutra & Bui, Nang Duc, 2023. "Reliability assessment of pipelines crossing strike-slip faults considering modeling uncertainties using ANN models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:237:y:2023:i:c:s0951832023002855
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023002855
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109371?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iannacone, Leandro & Sharma, Neetesh & Tabandeh, Armin & Gardoni, Paolo, 2022. "Modeling Time-varying Reliability and Resilience of Deteriorating Infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Xu, Zhaoyi & Saleh, Joseph Homer, 2021. "Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    3. Bao, Yuequan & Xiang, Zhengliang & Li, Hui, 2021. "Adaptive subset searching-based deep neural network method for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    4. Zio, E., 2009. "Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 125-141.
    5. Wei, Pengfei & Liu, Fuchao & Tang, Chenghu, 2018. "Reliability and reliability-based importance analysis of structural systems using multiple response Gaussian process model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 183-195.
    6. Xu, Yanwen & Kohtz, Sara & Boakye, Jessica & Gardoni, Paolo & Wang, Pingfeng, 2023. "Physics-informed machine learning for reliability and systems safety applications: State of the art and challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    7. Miele, S. & Karve, P. & Mahadevan, S., 2023. "Multi-fidelity physics-informed machine learning for probabilistic damage diagnosis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    8. Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 137-150.
    9. Subramanian, Abhinav & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2023. "Probabilistic physics-informed machine learning for dynamic systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    10. Saraygord Afshari, Sajad & Enayatollahi, Fatemeh & Xu, Xiangyang & Liang, Xihui, 2022. "Machine learning-based methods in structural reliability analysis: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oster, Matthew R. & King, Ethan & Bakker, Craig & Bhattacharya, Arnab & Chatterjee, Samrat & Pan, Feng, 2023. "Multi-level optimization with the koopman operator for data-driven, domain-aware, and dynamic system security," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Zhang, Chi & Shafieezadeh, Abdollah, 2022. "Simulation-free reliability analysis with active learning and Physics-Informed Neural Network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    3. Guan, Xiaoshu & Sun, Huabin & Hou, Rongrong & Xu, Yang & Bao, Yuequan & Li, Hui, 2023. "A deep reinforcement learning method for structural dominant failure modes searching based on self-play strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    4. Luo, Changqi & Zhu, Shun-Peng & Keshtegar, Behrooz & Niu, Xiaopeng & Taylan, Osman, 2023. "An enhanced uniform simulation approach coupled with SVR for efficient structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    5. Zio, E., 2018. "The future of risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 176-190.
    6. Senderov, Sergey M. & Smirnova, Elena M. & Vorobev, Sergey V., 2020. "Analysis of vulnerability of fuel supply systems in gas-consuming regions due to failure of critical gas industry facilities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    7. Bo, Yimin & Bao, Minglei & Ding, Yi & Hu, Yishuang, 2024. "A DNN-based reliability evaluation method for multi-state series-parallel systems considering semi-Markov process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    8. Mühlhofer, Evelyn & Koks, Elco E. & Kropf, Chahan M. & Sansavini, Giovanni & Bresch, David N., 2023. "A generalized natural hazard risk modelling framework for infrastructure failure cascades," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    9. Khakifirooz, Marzieh & Fathi, Michel & Lee, I-Chen & Tseng, Sheng-Tsaing, 2023. "Neural ordinary differential equation for sequential optimal design of fatigue test under accelerated life test analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    10. Cao, Bohan & Yin, Qishuai & Guo, Yingying & Yang, Jin & Zhang, Laibin & Wang, Zhenquan & Tyagi, Mayank & Sun, Ting & Zhou, Xu, 2023. "Field data analysis and risk assessment of shallow gas hazards based on neural networks during industrial deep-water drilling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    11. Linn Svegrup & Jonas Johansson & Henrik Hassel, 2019. "Integration of Critical Infrastructure and Societal Consequence Models: Impact on Swedish Power System Mitigation Decisions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1970-1996, September.
    12. Zhang, Ruixing & An, Liqiang & He, Lun & Yang, Xinmeng & Huang, Zenghao, 2024. "Reliability analysis and inverse optimization method for floating wind turbines driven by dual meta-models combining transient-steady responses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    13. Roy, Atin & Chakraborty, Subrata, 2023. "Support vector machine in structural reliability analysis: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    14. Saraygord Afshari, Sajad & Enayatollahi, Fatemeh & Xu, Xiangyang & Liang, Xihui, 2022. "Machine learning-based methods in structural reliability analysis: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    15. Beyza, Jesus & Gil, Pablo & Masera, Marcelo & Yusta, Jose M., 2020. "Security assessment of cross-border electricity interconnections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    16. Wang, Run-Zi & Gu, Hang-Hang & Zhu, Shun-Peng & Li, Kai-Shang & Wang, Ji & Wang, Xiao-Wei & Hideo, Miura & Zhang, Xian-Cheng & Tu, Shan-Tung, 2022. "A data-driven roadmap for creep-fatigue reliability assessment and its implementation in low-pressure turbine disk at elevated temperatures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    17. Yang, Chen & Lu, Wanze & Xia, Yuanqing, 2023. "Reliability-constrained optimal attitude-vibration control for rigid-flexible coupling satellite using interval dimension-wise analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    18. Yao, Wen & Zheng, Xiaohu & Zhang, Jun & Wang, Ning & Tang, Guijian, 2023. "Deep adaptive arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion: A mini-data-driven semi-supervised method for uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    19. Pan, Yongjun & Sun, Yu & Li, Zhixiong & Gardoni, Paolo, 2023. "Machine learning approaches to estimate suspension parameters for performance degradation assessment using accurate dynamic simulations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    20. Zhang, Qing & Tang, Lv & Xuan, Jianping & Shi, Tielin & Li, Rui, 2023. "An uncertainty relevance metric-based domain adaptation fault diagnosis method to overcome class relevance caused confusion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:237:y:2023:i:c:s0951832023002855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.