IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i21p4163-d282105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review and Comparison of Intelligent Optimization Modelling Techniques for Energy Forecasting and Condition-Based Maintenance in PV Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Jesús Ferrero Bermejo

    (Magtel Operaciones, 41940 Seville, Spain)

  • Juan Francisco Gómez Fernández

    (Department of Industrial Management, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros, 41092 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Rafael Pino

    (Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Facultad de Matemáticas, Universidad de Sevilla, 41012 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Adolfo Crespo Márquez

    (Department of Industrial Management, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros, 41092 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Antonio Jesús Guillén López

    (Department of Industrial Management, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros, 41092 Sevilla, Spain)

Abstract

Within the field of soft computing, intelligent optimization modelling techniques include various major techniques in artificial intelligence. These techniques pretend to generate new business knowledge transforming sets of "raw data" into business value. One of the principal applications of these techniques is related to the design of predictive analytics for the improvement of advanced CBM (condition-based maintenance) strategies and energy production forecasting. These advanced techniques can be used to transform control system data, operational data and maintenance event data to failure diagnostic and prognostic knowledge and, ultimately, to derive expected energy generation. One of the systems where these techniques can be applied with massive potential impact are the legacy monitoring systems existing in solar PV energy generation plants. These systems produce a great amount of data over time, while at the same time they demand an important effort in order to increase their performance through the use of more accurate predictive analytics to reduce production losses having a direct impact on ROI. How to choose the most suitable techniques to apply is one of the problems to address. This paper presents a review and a comparative analysis of six intelligent optimization modelling techniques, which have been applied on a PV plant case study, using the energy production forecast as the decision variable. The methodology proposed not only pretends to elicit the most accurate solution but also validates the results, in comparison with the different outputs for the different techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesús Ferrero Bermejo & Juan Francisco Gómez Fernández & Rafael Pino & Adolfo Crespo Márquez & Antonio Jesús Guillén López, 2019. "Review and Comparison of Intelligent Optimization Modelling Techniques for Energy Forecasting and Condition-Based Maintenance in PV Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:21:p:4163-:d:282105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/21/4163/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/21/4163/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhaoxuan Li & SM Mahbobur Rahman & Rolando Vega & Bing Dong, 2016. "A Hierarchical Approach Using Machine Learning Methods in Solar Photovoltaic Energy Production Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Chuan Li & Yun Bai & Bo Zeng, 2016. "Deep Feature Learning Architectures for Daily Reservoir Inflow Forecasting," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(14), pages 5145-5161, November.
    3. Voyant, Cyril & Notton, Gilles & Kalogirou, Soteris & Nivet, Marie-Laure & Paoli, Christophe & Motte, Fabrice & Fouilloy, Alexis, 2017. "Machine learning methods for solar radiation forecasting: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 569-582.
    4. Chen, Ji-Long & Liu, Hong-Bin & Wu, Wei & Xie, De-Ti, 2011. "Estimation of monthly solar radiation from measured temperatures using support vector machines – A case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 413-420.
    5. Rehman, Shafiqur & Mohandes, Mohamed, 2008. "Artificial neural network estimation of global solar radiation using air temperature and relative humidity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 571-576, February.
    6. Baños, R. & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. & Montoya, F.G. & Gil, C. & Alcayde, A. & Gómez, J., 2011. "Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 1753-1766, May.
    7. Wang, Huai-zhi & Li, Gang-qiang & Wang, Gui-bin & Peng, Jian-chun & Jiang, Hui & Liu, Yi-tao, 2017. "Deep learning based ensemble approach for probabilistic wind power forecasting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 56-70.
    8. Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Bojic, Milorad, 2000. "Artificial neural networks for the prediction of the energy consumption of a passive solar building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 479-491.
    9. Kusiak, Andrew & Zhang, Zijun & Verma, Anoop, 2013. "Prediction, operations, and condition monitoring in wind energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1-12.
    10. Zio, E., 2009. "Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 125-141.
    11. Hong Zhang & Lixing Chen & Yong Qu & Guo Zhao & Zhenwei Guo, 2014. "Support Vector Regression Based on Grid-Search Method for Short-Term Wind Power Forecasting," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-11, June.
    12. Olivencia Polo, Fernando A. & Ferrero Bermejo, Jesús & Gómez Fernández, Juan F. & Crespo Márquez, Adolfo, 2015. "Failure mode prediction and energy forecasting of PV plants to assist dynamic maintenance tasks by ANN based models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 227-238.
    13. Benedetti, Miriam & Cesarotti, Vittorio & Introna, Vito & Serranti, Jacopo, 2016. "Energy consumption control automation using Artificial Neural Networks and adaptive algorithms: Proposal of a new methodology and case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 60-71.
    14. Alireza Hooman & Govindan Marthandan & Wan Fadzilah Wan Yusoff & Mohana Omid & Sasan Karamizadeh, 2016. "Statistical and data mining methods in credit scoring," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 50(5), pages 371-381, Special I.
    15. Carolin Mabel, M. & Fernandez, E., 2008. "Analysis of wind power generation and prediction using ANN: A case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 986-992.
    16. Moutis, Panayiotis & Skarvelis-Kazakos, Spyros & Brucoli, Maria, 2016. "Decision tree aided planning and energy balancing of planned community microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 197-205.
    17. Mellit, A. & Benghanem, M. & Kalogirou, S.A., 2007. "Modeling and simulation of a stand-alone photovoltaic system using an adaptive artificial neural network: Proposition for a new sizing procedure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 285-313.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergio Bemposta Rosende & Javier Sánchez-Soriano & Carlos Quiterio Gómez Muñoz & Javier Fernández Andrés, 2020. "Remote Management Architecture of UAV Fleets for Maintenance, Surveillance, and Security Tasks in Solar Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Abdelilah Chalh & Aboubakr El Hammoumi & Saad Motahhir & Abdelaziz El Ghzizal & Umashankar Subramaniam & Aziz Derouich, 2020. "Trusted Simulation Using Proteus Model for a PV System: Test Case of an Improved HC MPPT Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Nguyen Thanh Viet & Alla G. Kravets, 2022. "The New Method for Analyzing Technology Trends of Smart Energy Asset Performance Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Cheng Yan & Jianfeng Zhu & Xiuli Shen & Jun Fan & Dong Mi & Zhengming Qian, 2020. "Ensemble of Regression-Type and Interpolation-Type Metamodels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Orest Lozynskyy & Damian Mazur & Yaroslav Marushchak & Bogdan Kwiatkowski & Andriy Lozynskyy & Tadeusz Kwater & Bohdan Kopchak & Przemysław Hawro & Lidiia Kasha & Robert Pękala & Robert Ziemba & Bogus, 2021. "Formation of Characteristic Polynomials on the Basis of Fractional Powers j of Dynamic Systems and Stability Problems of Such Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-35, November.
    6. Abdulla, Hind & Sleptchenko, Andrei & Nayfeh, Ammar, 2024. "Photovoltaic systems operation and maintenance: A review and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jha, Sunil Kr. & Bilalovic, Jasmin & Jha, Anju & Patel, Nilesh & Zhang, Han, 2017. "Renewable energy: Present research and future scope of Artificial Intelligence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 297-317.
    2. Adolfo Crespo Márquez & Antonio de la Fuente Carmona & Sara Antomarioni, 2019. "A Process to Implement an Artificial Neural Network and Association Rules Techniques to Improve Asset Performance and Energy Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Sharifzadeh, Mahdi & Sikinioti-Lock, Alexandra & Shah, Nilay, 2019. "Machine-learning methods for integrated renewable power generation: A comparative study of artificial neural networks, support vector regression, and Gaussian Process Regression," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 513-538.
    4. Miriam Benedetti & Francesca Bonfà & Vito Introna & Annalisa Santolamazza & Stefano Ubertini, 2019. "Real Time Energy Performance Control for Industrial Compressed Air Systems: Methodology and Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-28, October.
    5. Salcedo-Sanz, Sancho & Deo, Ravinesh C. & Cornejo-Bueno, Laura & Camacho-Gómez, Carlos & Ghimire, Sujan, 2018. "An efficient neuro-evolutionary hybrid modelling mechanism for the estimation of daily global solar radiation in the Sunshine State of Australia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 79-94.
    6. Aslam, Sheraz & Herodotou, Herodotos & Mohsin, Syed Muhammad & Javaid, Nadeem & Ashraf, Nouman & Aslam, Shahzad, 2021. "A survey on deep learning methods for power load and renewable energy forecasting in smart microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    7. Hwang, Jun Kwon & Yun, Geun Young & Lee, Sukho & Seo, Hyeongjoon & Santamouris, Mat, 2020. "Using deep learning approaches with variable selection process to predict the energy performance of a heating and cooling system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1227-1245.
    8. Munir Husein & Il-Yop Chung, 2019. "Day-Ahead Solar Irradiance Forecasting for Microgrids Using a Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Network: A Deep Learning Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Amir Mosavi & Mohsen Salimi & Sina Faizollahzadeh Ardabili & Timon Rabczuk & Shahaboddin Shamshirband & Annamaria R. Varkonyi-Koczy, 2019. "State of the Art of Machine Learning Models in Energy Systems, a Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-42, April.
    10. Miguel A. Rodríguez-López & Luis M. López-González & Luis M. López-Ochoa & Jesús Las-Heras-Casas, 2018. "Methodology for Detecting Malfunctions and Evaluating the Maintenance Effectiveness in Wind Turbine Generator Bearings Using Generic versus Specific Models from SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Wang, Kejun & Qi, Xiaoxia & Liu, Hongda, 2019. "A comparison of day-ahead photovoltaic power forecasting models based on deep learning neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Sellak, Hamza & Ouhbi, Brahim & Frikh, Bouchra & Palomares, Iván, 2017. "Towards next-generation energy planning decision-making: An expert-based framework for intelligent decision support," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1544-1577.
    13. Meenal, R. & Selvakumar, A. Immanuel, 2018. "Assessment of SVM, empirical and ANN based solar radiation prediction models with most influencing input parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 324-343.
    14. Khatib, Tamer & Mohamed, Azah & Sopian, K., 2013. "A review of photovoltaic systems size optimization techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 454-465.
    15. Sabarathinam Srinivasan & Suresh Kumarasamy & Zacharias E. Andreadakis & Pedro G. Lind, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Models of Power Grids Driven by Renewable Energy Sources: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-56, July.
    16. Boza, Pal & Evgeniou, Theodoros, 2021. "Artificial intelligence to support the integration of variable renewable energy sources to the power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    17. Abdulla, Hind & Sleptchenko, Andrei & Nayfeh, Ammar, 2024. "Photovoltaic systems operation and maintenance: A review and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    18. Ascione, Fabrizio & Bianco, Nicola & De Stasio, Claudio & Mauro, Gerardo Maria & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2017. "Artificial neural networks to predict energy performance and retrofit scenarios for any member of a building category: A novel approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 999-1017.
    19. Wang, Kejun & Qi, Xiaoxia & Liu, Hongda, 2019. "Photovoltaic power forecasting based LSTM-Convolutional Network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    20. Nam, KiJeon & Hwangbo, Soonho & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2020. "A deep learning-based forecasting model for renewable energy scenarios to guide sustainable energy policy: A case study of Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:21:p:4163-:d:282105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.