IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v252y2024ics0951832024004605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building reliability of risk assessment of domino effects in chemical tank farm through an improved uncertainty analysis method

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Hongrui
  • Ding, Long
  • Ji, Jie
  • Zhu, Jiping

Abstract

The severity and complexity of fire-induced domino effects have received widespread attention. The spatial and temporal evolution process modeling of domino accidents is still stuck in single crisp value, in which the uncertainty will affect the reliability of the results. In this paper, we propose a computational method for uncertainty propagation of the evolution process modeling of the domino effect called Uncertainty Propagation of Domino Evolution Model (UPDEM), aiming to increase the reliability of risk assessment results. The method is capable of obtaining ranges and corresponding probability envelopes for tiame to failure and escalation probabilities, and quantifying uncertainty for all computational models that require input parameters. The uncertainty is quantified based on the evidence theory and a parameter cropping method based on the stress-strength interference model is proposed to optimize the evidence theory. The proposed method is applied to a case study and compared with previous studies. The comparison confirms that the results are more reliable after considering uncertainty and can produce the worst possible scenario consequence. Conducting the sensitivity analysis to prioritize the treatment of parameters and identify effective measures in risk control. The methodology can provide an important reference for decision-makers to prevent and control domino effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Hongrui & Ding, Long & Ji, Jie & Zhu, Jiping, 2024. "Building reliability of risk assessment of domino effects in chemical tank farm through an improved uncertainty analysis method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:252:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024004605
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024004605
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110388?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:252:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024004605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.