IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i12p1881-d1416451.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybrid Genetic Algorithm and Tabu Search for Solving Preventive Maintenance Scheduling Problem for Cogeneration Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Khaled Alhamad

    (Laboratory Technology Department, College of Technological Studies, The Public Authority for Applied Education and Training (PAAET), Shuwaikh 70654, Kuwait)

  • Yousuf Alkhezi

    (Mathematics Department, College of Basic Education, Public Authority for Applied Education and Training (PAAET), Shuwaikh 70654, Kuwait)

Abstract

Preventive Maintenance (PM) is a periodic maintenance strategy that has great results for devices in extending their lives, increasing productivity, and, most importantly, helping to avoid unexpected breakdowns and their costly consequences. Preventive maintenance scheduling (PMS) is determining the time for carrying out PM, and it represents a sensitive issue in terms of impact on production if the time for the PM process is not optimally distributed. This study employs hybrid heuristic methods, integrating Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Tabu Search (TS), to address the PMS problem. Notably, the search for an optimal solution remained elusive with GA alone until the inclusion of TS. The resultant optimal solution is achieved swiftly, surpassing the time benchmarks set by conventional methods like integer programming and nonlinear integer programming. A comparison with a published article that used metaheuristics was also applied in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed hybrid approach in terms of solution quality and convergence speed. Moreover, sensitivity analysis underscores the robustness and efficacy of the hybrid approach, consistently yielding optimal solutions across diverse scenarios. The schedule created exceeds standards set by waterworks experts, yielding significant water and electricity surpluses—16.6% and 12.1%, respectively—while simultaneously matching or surpassing total production levels. This method can be used for power plants in private or public sectors to generate an optimal PMS, save money, and avoid water or electricity cuts. In summary, this hybrid approach offers an efficient and effective solution for optimizing PMS, presenting opportunities for enhancement across various industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Khaled Alhamad & Yousuf Alkhezi, 2024. "Hybrid Genetic Algorithm and Tabu Search for Solving Preventive Maintenance Scheduling Problem for Cogeneration Plants," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:12:p:1881-:d:1416451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/12/1881/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/12/1881/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Go, Hun & Kim, Ji-Su & Lee, Dong-Ho, 2013. "Operation and preventive maintenance scheduling for containerships: Mathematical model and solution algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(3), pages 626-636.
    2. Lin, Boliang & Zhao, Yinan, 2021. "Synchronized optimization of EMU train assignment and second-level preventive maintenance scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Lapa, Celso Marcelo F. & Pereira, Cláudio Márcio N.A. & de Barros, Márcio Paes, 2006. "A model for preventive maintenance planning by genetic algorithms based in cost and reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 233-240.
    4. Khaled Alhamad & Mohsen Alardhi & Abdulla Almazrouee, 2015. "Preventive Maintenance Scheduling for Multicogeneration Plants with Production Constraints Using Genetic Algorithms," Advances in Operations Research, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-12, February.
    5. Froger, Aurélien & Gendreau, Michel & Mendoza, Jorge E. & Pinson, Éric & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2016. "Maintenance scheduling in the electricity industry: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 695-706.
    6. S Y Sohn & K B Yoon, 2010. "Dynamic preventive maintenance scheduling of the modules of fighter aircraft based on random effects regression model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(6), pages 974-979, June.
    7. Li Li & Yong Wang & Kuo-Yi Lin, 2021. "Preventive maintenance scheduling optimization based on opportunistic production-maintenance synchronization," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 545-558, February.
    8. Nima Safaei & Dragan Banjevic & Andrew Jardine, 2011. "Workforce-constrained maintenance scheduling for military aircraft fleet: a case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 295-316, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petchrompo, Sanyapong & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar, 2019. "A review of asset management literature on multi-asset systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 181-201.
    2. Khaled Alhamad & Rym M’Hallah & Cormac Lucas, 2021. "A Mathematical Program for Scheduling Preventive Maintenance of Cogeneration Plants with Production," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Huang, Zhouchun & Zheng, Qipeng Phil, 2020. "A multistage stochastic programming approach for preventive maintenance scheduling of GENCOs with natural gas contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1036-1051.
    4. Khaled Alhamad & Yousuf Alkhezi & M. F. Alhajri, 2022. "Nonlinear Integer Programming for Solving Preventive Maintenance Scheduling Problem for Cogeneration Plants with Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Gokturk Poyrazoglu & HyungSeon Oh, 2019. "Co-optimization of Transmission Maintenance Scheduling and Production Cost Minimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Thomas Bittar & Pierre Carpentier & Jean-Philippe Chancelier & Jérôme Lonchampt, 2022. "A decomposition method by interaction prediction for the optimization of maintenance scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 229-267, September.
    7. Changjiu Li & Yong Zhang & Xichao Su & Xinwei Wang, 2022. "An Improved Optimization Algorithm for Aeronautical Maintenance and Repair Task Scheduling Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Lin, Boliang & Zhao, Yinan, 2021. "Synchronized optimization of EMU train assignment and second-level preventive maintenance scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    9. Dilaver, Halit Metehan & Akçay, Alp & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2023. "Integrated planning of asset-use and dry-docking for a fleet of maritime assets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    10. Hoseini, Naghi & Sheikholeslami, Abdolreza & Barforoushi, Taghi & Latify, Mohammad Amin, 2020. "Preventive maintenance mid-term scheduling of resources in multi-carrier energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    11. Yonit Barron, 2018. "Group maintenance policies for an R-out-of-N system with phase-type distribution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 261(1), pages 79-105, February.
    12. Do, Phuc & Vu, Hai Canh & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2015. "Maintenance grouping for multi-component systems with availability constraints and limited maintenance teams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 56-67.
    13. Parhizkar, Tarannom & Mosleh, Ali & Roshandel, Ramin, 2017. "Aging based optimal scheduling framework for power plants using equivalent operating hour approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1345-1363.
    14. Michael D. Teter & Johannes O. Royset & Alexandra M. Newman, 2019. "Modeling uncertainty of expert elicitation for use in risk-based optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 280(1), pages 189-210, September.
    15. David Woller & Jakub Rada & Miroslav Kulich, 2023. "The ALNS metaheuristic for the transmission maintenance scheduling," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 349-382, June.
    16. Deng, Qichen & Santos, Bruno F. & Curran, Richard, 2020. "A practical dynamic programming based methodology for aircraft maintenance check scheduling optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 256-273.
    17. Marvin L. King & David R. Galbreath & Alexandra M. Newman & Amanda S. Hering, 2020. "Combining regression and mixed-integer programming to model counterinsurgency," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 287-320, September.
    18. Michel Vasquez & Mirsad Buljubasic & Saïd Hanafi, 2023. "An efficient scenario penalization matheuristic for a stochastic scheduling problem," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 383-408, June.
    19. Setareh Boshrouei Shargh & Mostafa Zandieh & Ashkan Ayough & Farbod Farhadi, 2024. "Scheduling in services: a review and bibliometric analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 754-783, June.
    20. Cha, Guesik & Park, Junseok & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2023. "Military aircraft flight and maintenance planning model considering heterogeneous maintenance tasks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:12:p:1881-:d:1416451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.