IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v264y2018i3p1045-1057.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profit-maximization generation maintenance scheduling through bi-level programming

Author

Listed:
  • Mazidi, Peyman
  • Tohidi, Yaser
  • Ramos, Andres
  • Sanz-Bobi, Miguel A.

Abstract

This paper addresses the generation maintenance scheduling (GMS) dilemma in a deregulated power system. At first, under a centralized cost minimization framework, a GMS is formulated and set as the benchmark (cost-minimization GMS). Then, the cost-minimization is changed into a profit-maximization problem of generation companies (GENCOs) and the GMS is developed as a bi-level optimization. Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions are applied to transform the bi-level into a single-level mixed-integer linear problem and subsequently, Nash equilibrium is obtained as the final solution for the GMS under a deregulated market (profit-maximization GMS). Moreover, to incorporate reliability and economic regulatory constraints, two rescheduling signals (incentive and penalty) are considered as coordination processes among GENCOs and independent system operators. These signals are based on energy-not-supplied and operation cost, and ensure that the result of profit-maximization GMS is in the given reliability and social cost limits, respectively. These limits are obtained from the cost-minimization GMS. Lastly, the model is evaluated on a test system. The results demonstrate applicability and challenges in GMS problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Mazidi, Peyman & Tohidi, Yaser & Ramos, Andres & Sanz-Bobi, Miguel A., 2018. "Profit-maximization generation maintenance scheduling through bi-level programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 1045-1057.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:264:y:2018:i:3:p:1045-1057
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.07.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221717306355
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.07.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fotouhi Ghazvini, Mohammad Ali & Canizes, Bruno & Vale, Zita & Morais, Hugo, 2013. "Stochastic short-term maintenance scheduling of GENCOs in an oligopolistic electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 667-677.
    2. Fitiwi, Desta Z. & de Cuadra, F. & Olmos, L. & Rivier, M., 2015. "A new approach of clustering operational states for power network expansion planning problems dealing with RES (renewable energy source) generation operational variability and uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1360-1376.
    3. Gianni Codato & Matteo Fischetti, 2006. "Combinatorial Benders' Cuts for Mixed-Integer Linear Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 756-766, August.
    4. Min, C.G. & Kim, M.K. & Park, J.K. & Yoon, Y.T., 2013. "Game-theory-based generation maintenance scheduling in electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 310-318.
    5. Steven Gabriel & Sauleh Siddiqui & Antonio Conejo & Carlos Ruiz, 2013. "Solving Discretely-Constrained Nash–Cournot Games with an Application to Power Markets," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 307-326, September.
    6. Froger, Aurélien & Gendreau, Michel & Mendoza, Jorge E. & Pinson, Éric & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2016. "Maintenance scheduling in the electricity industry: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 695-706.
    7. Kralj, Branimir L. & Petrovic, Radivoj, 1988. "Optimal preventive maintenance scheduling of thermal generating units in power systems --A survey of problem formulations and solution methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanyu Gu & Hue Chi Lam & Thi Thanh Thu Pham & Yakov Zinder, 2023. "Heuristics and meta-heuristic to solve the ROADEF/EURO challenge 2020 maintenance planning problem," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 139-175, February.
    2. Shin, Hansol & Kim, Wook, 2023. "Comparison of the centralized and decentralized environmentally constrained economic dispatch methods of coal-fired generators: A case study for South Korea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Kim, Seon-Yong & Kim, Man-Keun & Choi, Myung Hwan & Kim, Dae-Wook, 2024. "Optimal preventive maintenance: Balancing reliability and costs in the electricity market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    4. Si, Guojin & Xia, Tangbin & Gebraeel, Nagi & Wang, Dong & Pan, Ershun & Xi, Lifeng, 2022. "A reliability-and-cost-based framework to optimize maintenance planning and diverse-skilled technician routing for geographically distributed systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    5. Huang, Zhouchun & Zheng, Qipeng Phil, 2020. "A multistage stochastic programming approach for preventive maintenance scheduling of GENCOs with natural gas contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1036-1051.
    6. Acuña, Luceny Guzmán & Ríos, Diana Ramírez & Arboleda, Carlos Paternina & Ponzón, Esneyder González, 2018. "Cooperation model in the electricity energy market using bi-level optimization and Shapley value," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 161-168.
    7. Tae-Woo Kim & Yenjae Chang & Dae-Wook Kim & Man-Keun Kim, 2020. "Preventive Maintenance and Forced Outages in Power Plants in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Si, Guojin & Xia, Tangbin & Zhu, Ying & Du, Shichang & Xi, Lifeng, 2019. "Triple-level opportunistic maintenance policy for leasehold service network of multi-location production lines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Li, Longxi, 2021. "Coordination between smart distribution networks and multi-microgrids considering demand side management: A trilevel framework," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rokhforoz, Pegah & Gjorgiev, Blazhe & Sansavini, Giovanni & Fink, Olga, 2021. "Multi-agent maintenance scheduling based on the coordination between central operator and decentralized producers in an electricity market," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    2. Froger, Aurélien & Gendreau, Michel & Mendoza, Jorge E. & Pinson, Éric & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2016. "Maintenance scheduling in the electricity industry: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 695-706.
    3. Petchrompo, Sanyapong & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar, 2019. "A review of asset management literature on multi-asset systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 181-201.
    4. Rodríguez, Jesús A. & Anjos, Miguel F. & Côté, Pascal & Desaulniers, Guy, 2021. "Accelerating Benders decomposition for short-term hydropower maintenance scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 240-253.
    5. Motalleb, Mahdi & Annaswamy, Anuradha & Ghorbani, Reza, 2018. "A real-time demand response market through a repeated incomplete-information game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 424-438.
    6. Acuña, Luceny Guzmán & Ríos, Diana Ramírez & Arboleda, Carlos Paternina & Ponzón, Esneyder González, 2018. "Cooperation model in the electricity energy market using bi-level optimization and Shapley value," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 161-168.
    7. M. Jenabi & S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi & S. A. Torabi & Moeen Sammak Jalali, 2022. "An accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm for stochastic power system expansion planning using sample average approximation," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(4), pages 1304-1336, December.
    8. Rabinowitz, Gadi & Goren, Shai & Mehrez, Abraham, 2000. "Scheduling two machines that require multiple types of maintenance, for a single operation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(3), pages 546-564, December.
    9. Dávid Csercsik & László Á. Kóczy, 2017. "Efficiency and Stability in Electrical Power Transmission Networks: a Partition Function Form Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1161-1184, December.
    10. Sadeghian, Omid & Mohammadpour Shotorbani, Amin & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam & Sadiq, Rehan & Hewage, Kasun, 2021. "Risk-averse maintenance scheduling of generation units in combined heat and power systems with demand response," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    11. Elisangela Martins de Sá & Ivan Contreras & Jean-François Cordeau & Ricardo Saraiva de Camargo & Gilberto de Miranda, 2015. "The Hub Line Location Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 500-518, August.
    12. Bahl, Björn & Kümpel, Alexander & Seele, Hagen & Lampe, Matthias & Bardow, André, 2017. "Time-series aggregation for synthesis problems by bounding error in the objective function," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 900-912.
    13. Gokturk Poyrazoglu & HyungSeon Oh, 2019. "Co-optimization of Transmission Maintenance Scheduling and Production Cost Minimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Thomas Bittar & Pierre Carpentier & Jean-Philippe Chancelier & Jérôme Lonchampt, 2022. "A decomposition method by interaction prediction for the optimization of maintenance scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 229-267, September.
    15. Zhou, Dengji & Yu, Ziqiang & Zhang, Huisheng & Weng, Shilie, 2016. "A novel grey prognostic model based on Markov process and grey incidence analysis for energy conversion equipment degradation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 420-429.
    16. Hassan Shavandi & Mehrdad Pirnia & J. David Fuller, 2018. "Extended opportunity cost model to find near equilibrium electricity prices under non-convexities," Papers 1809.09734, arXiv.org.
    17. Yossiri Adulyasak & Jean-François Cordeau & Raf Jans, 2015. "Benders Decomposition for Production Routing Under Demand Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 851-867, August.
    18. Jérémy Omer & Michael Poss, 2021. "Identifying relatively irreducible infeasible subsystems of linear inequalities," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 361-379, September.
    19. Ragheb Rahmaniani & Shabbir Ahmed & Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Michel Gendreau & Walter Rei, 2020. "The Benders Dual Decomposition Method," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 878-895, May.
    20. Maher, Stephen J., 2021. "Implementing the branch-and-cut approach for a general purpose Benders’ decomposition framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 479-498.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:264:y:2018:i:3:p:1045-1057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.