IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i20p4288-d1259785.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Simulation Study of Aircraft Boarding Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Hélio Moreira

    (School of Engineering, ISEP, Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal)

  • Luís P. Ferreira

    (School of Engineering, ISEP, Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal
    Associate Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aerospace (LAETA-INEGI), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Nuno O. Fernandes

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco, Av. do Empresário, 6000-767 Castelo Branco, Portugal
    ALGORITMI Research Centre, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal)

  • Francisco J. G. Silva

    (School of Engineering, ISEP, Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal
    Associate Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aerospace (LAETA-INEGI), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Ana L. Ramos

    (Competitiveness and Public Policies (GOVCOPP), Industrial Engineering and Tourism (DEGEIT), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Paulo Ávila

    (School of Engineering, ISEP, Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal
    INESC TEC—Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores, Tecnologia e Ciência, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

To ensure the safety of passengers concerning virus propagation, such as COVID-19, and keep the turnaround time at low levels, airlines should seek efficient aircraft boarding strategies in terms of both physical distancing and boarding times. This study seeks to analyze the impact of different boarding strategies in the context of the International Air Transport Association’s recommendations during the pandemic to reduce interference and physical contact between passengers in airplanes. Boarding strategies such as back-to-front , outside-in , reverse pyramid , blocks , Steffen , and modified optimal have been tested in this context. This study extends the previous literature using discrete event simulation to evaluate the impact of the occupation of the middle seat by family members only. This study also analyses the impact of having passengers carrying hand luggage and priority passengers on the performance of these strategies concerning boarding times. In general, the simulation results revealed a 15% improvement in boarding times when the reverse pyramid strategy is used compared to a random strategy, which essentially results from a reduction in the boarding interferences between passengers. The results also show that Steffen’s strategy is the best performing, while the blocks strategy results in the worst performance. This study has practical implications for airline companies concerning both operation efficiency and passenger safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Hélio Moreira & Luís P. Ferreira & Nuno O. Fernandes & Francisco J. G. Silva & Ana L. Ramos & Paulo Ávila, 2023. "A Simulation Study of Aircraft Boarding Strategies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:20:p:4288-:d:1259785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/20/4288/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/20/4288/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Menkes H. L. van den Briel & J. René Villalobos & Gary L. Hogg & Tim Lindemann & Anthony V. Mulé, 2005. "America West Airlines Develops Efficient Boarding Strategies," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 191-201, June.
    2. Mostafa Salari & R. John Milne & Lina Kattan, 2019. "Airplane boarding optimization considering reserved seats and passengers’ carry-on bags," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(3), pages 806-823, September.
    3. Van Landeghem, H. & Beuselinck, A., 2002. "Reducing passenger boarding time in airplanes: A simulation based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 294-308, October.
    4. Nyquist, David C. & McFadden, Kathleen L., 2008. "A study of the airline boarding problem," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 197-204.
    5. Steffen, Jason H., 2008. "Optimal boarding method for airline passengers," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 146-150.
    6. Camelia Delcea & Liviu-Adrian Cotfas & Nora Chiriță & Ionuț Nica, 2018. "A Two-Door Airplane Boarding Approach When Using Apron Buses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Ren, Xinhui & Xu, Xiaobing, 2018. "Experimental analyses of airplane boarding based on interference classification," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 55-63.
    8. Michael Schultz & Jörg Fuchte, 2020. "Evaluation of Aircraft Boarding Scenarios Considering Reduced Transmissions Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Vítor Silva & Luís Pinto Ferreira & Francisco J. G. Silva & Benny Tjahjono & Paulo Ávila, 2021. "Simulation-Based Decision Support System to Improve Material Flow of a Textile Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seung-Wan Cho & Kyung-Min Seo & Jung-Min Yun & Bong-Gu Kang, 2024. "Simulation-Based Analysis for Verifying New Certification Standards of Smart LED Streetlight Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salari, Mostafa & Milne, R. John & Delcea, Camelia & Kattan, Lina & Cotfas, Liviu-Adrian, 2020. "Social distancing in airplane seat assignments," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Camelia Delcea & Liviu-Adrian Cotfas & Mostafa Salari & R. John Milne, 2018. "Investigating the Random Seat Boarding Method without Seat Assignments with Common Boarding Practices Using an Agent-Based Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-28, December.
    3. Milne, R. John & Delcea, Camelia & Cotfas, Liviu-Adrian & Salari, Mostafa, 2019. "New methods for two-door airplane boarding using apron buses," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Fabrin, Bruna H.P. & Ferrari, Denise B. & Arraut, Eduardo M. & Neumann, Simone, 2024. "Towards balancing efficiency and customer satisfaction in airplane boarding: An agent-based approach," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 12(C).
    5. Camelia Delcea & Liviu-Adrian Cotfas & Liliana Crăciun & Anca Gabriela Molanescu, 2018. "Are Seat and Aisle Interferences Affecting the Overall Airplane Boarding Time? An Agent-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Zeineddine, Hassan, 2021. "Reducing the effect of passengers’ non-compliance with aircraft boarding rules," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Camelia Delcea & Liviu-Adrian Cotfas & Nora Chiriță & Ionuț Nica, 2018. "A Two-Door Airplane Boarding Approach When Using Apron Buses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Schultz, Michael & Soolaki, Majid & Salari, Mostafa & Bakhshian, Elnaz, 2023. "A combined optimization–simulation approach for modified outside-in boarding under COVID-19 regulations including limited baggage compartment capacities," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    9. Hélio Moreira & Luís Pinto Ferreira & Nuno O. Fernandes & Ana Luísa Ramos & Paulo Ávila, 2023. "Analysis of Boarding Strategies on an Airbus A320 Using Discrete Event Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Ren, Xinhui & Zhou, Xiyu & Xu, Xiaobing, 2020. "A new model of luggage storage time while boarding an airplane: An experimental test," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    11. Wittmann, Jürgen, 2019. "Customer-oriented optimization of the airplane boarding process," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 31-39.
    12. Schultz, Michael & Evler, Jan & Asadi, Ehsan & Preis, Henning & Fricke, Hartmut & Wu, Cheng-Lung, 2020. "Future aircraft turnaround operations considering post-pandemic requirements," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    13. R John Milne & Liviu-Adrian Cotfas & Camelia Delcea & Liliana Crăciun & Anca-Gabriela Molănescu, 2020. "Adapting the reverse pyramid airplane boarding method for social distancing in times of COVID-19," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, November.
    14. Steffen, Jason H. & Hotchkiss, Jon, 2012. "Experimental test of airplane boarding methods," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 64-67.
    15. Michael Schultz & Jörg Fuchte, 2020. "Evaluation of Aircraft Boarding Scenarios Considering Reduced Transmissions Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, July.
    16. Tang, Tie-Qiao & Yang, Shao-Peng & Ou, Hui & Chen, Liang & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2018. "An aircraft boarding model accounting for group behavior," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 182-189.
    17. Kisiel, Tomasz, 2020. "Resilience of passenger boarding strategies to priority fares offered by airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    18. Camelia Delcea & Liviu-Adrian Cotfas & Ramona Paun, 2018. "Agent-Based Evaluation of the Airplane Boarding Strategies’ Efficiency and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, June.
    19. Jaehn, Florian & Neumann, Simone, 2015. "Airplane boarding," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 339-359.
    20. Zeineddine, Hassan, 2017. "A dynamically optimized aircraft boarding strategy," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 144-151.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:20:p:4288-:d:1259785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.