IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i19p3625-d932947.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine Learning Models for Predicting Romanian Farmers’ Purchase of Crop Insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Codruţa Mare

    (Department of Statistics-Forecasts-Mathematics, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, and The Interdisciplinary Centre for Data Science, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400591 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Daniela Manaţe

    (Department of Statistics-Forecasts-Mathematics, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, and The Interdisciplinary Centre for Data Science, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400591 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Gabriela-Mihaela Mureşan

    (Department of Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400591 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Simona Laura Dragoş

    (Department of Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400591 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Cristian Mihai Dragoş

    (Department of Statistics-Forecasts-Mathematics, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, and The Interdisciplinary Centre for Data Science, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400591 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Alexandra-Anca Purcel

    (Department of Statistics-Forecasts-Mathematics, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, and The Interdisciplinary Centre for Data Science, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400591 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

Considering the large size of the agricultural sector in Romania, increasing the crop insurance adoption rate and identifying the factors that drive adoption can present a real interest in the Romanian market. The main objective of this research was to identify the performance of machine learning (ML) models in predicting Romanian farmers’ purchase of crop insurance based on crop-level and farmer-level characteristics. The data set used contains 721 responses to a survey administered to Romanian farmers in September 2021, and includes both characteristics related to the crop as well as farmer-level socio-demographic attributes, perception about risk, perception about insurers and knowledge about agricultural insurance. Various ML algorithms have been implemented, and among the approaches developed, the Multi-Layer Perceptron Classifier (MLP) and the Linear Support Vector Classifier (SVC) outperform the other algorithms in terms of overall accuracy. Tree-based ensembles were used to identify the most prominent features, which included the farmer’s general perception of risk, their likelihood of engaging in risky behaviour, as well as their level of knowledge about crop insurance. The models implemented in this study could be a useful tool for insurers and policymakers for predicting potential crop insurance ownership.

Suggested Citation

  • Codruţa Mare & Daniela Manaţe & Gabriela-Mihaela Mureşan & Simona Laura Dragoş & Cristian Mihai Dragoş & Alexandra-Anca Purcel, 2022. "Machine Learning Models for Predicting Romanian Farmers’ Purchase of Crop Insurance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:19:p:3625-:d:932947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/19/3625/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/19/3625/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Poorvi Iyer & Martina Bozzola & Stefan Hirsch & Manuela Meraner & Robert Finger, 2020. "Measuring Farmer Risk Preferences in Europe: A Systematic Review," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(1), pages 3-26, February.
    2. Rahimikia, Eghbal & Mohammadi, Shapour & Rahmani, Teymur & Ghazanfari, Mehdi, 2017. "Detecting corporate tax evasion using a hybrid intelligent system: A case study of Iran," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 1-17.
    3. Alberto Garrido & David Zilberman, 2008. "Revisiting the demand for agricultural insurance: the case of Spain," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 68(1), pages 43-66, May.
    4. Enjolras, Geoffroy & Capitanio, Fabian & Adinolfi, Felice, 2012. "The Demand for Crop Insurance: Combined Approaches for France and Italy," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18.
    5. Fahad, Shah & Wang, Jing & Hu, Guangyin & Wang, Hui & Yang, Xiaoying & Shah, Ashfaq Ahmad & Huong, Nguyen Thi Lan & Bilal, Arshad, 2018. "Empirical analysis of factors influencing farmers crop insurance decisions in Pakistan: Evidence from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 459-467.
    6. Marianne Lefebvre & Dimitre Nikolov & Sergio Gomez-y-Paloma & Minka Chopeva, 2014. "Determinants of insurance adoption among Bulgarian farmers," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 74(3), pages 326-347, August.
    7. Hans P. Binswanger-Mkhize, 2012. "Is There Too Much Hype about Index-based Agricultural Insurance?," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 187-200, February.
    8. Azar Ghahari & Nathaniel K. Newlands & Vyacheslav Lyubchich & Yulia R. Gel, 2019. "Deep Learning at the Interface of Agricultural Insurance Risk and Spatio-Temporal Uncertainty in Weather Extremes," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 535-550, October.
    9. Osman Gulseven, 2020. "Estimating the Demand Factors and Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Insurance," Papers 2004.11279, arXiv.org.
    10. Anna Zubor-Nemes & József Fogarasi & András Molnár & Gábor Kemény, 2018. "Farmers’ responses to the changes in Hungarian agricultural insurance system," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 78(2), pages 275-288, March.
    11. Ruth Vargas Hill & John Hoddinott & Neha Kumar, 2013. "Adoption of weather-index insurance: learning from willingness to pay among a panel of households in rural Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 44(4-5), pages 385-398, July.
    12. Lin, Boqiang & Wang, Ting, 2012. "Forecasting natural gas supply in China: Production peak and import trends," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 225-233.
    13. Mohamed Hanafy & Ruixing Ming, 2021. "Machine Learning Approaches for Auto Insurance Big Data," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-23, February.
    14. Dragos, Simona Laura & Dragos, Cristian Mihai & Muresan, Gabriela Mihaela, 2020. "From intention to decision in purchasing life insurance and private pensions: different effects of knowledge and behavioural factors," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    15. Goedde-Menke, Michael & Lehmensiek-Starke, Moritz & Nolte, Sven, 2014. "An empirical test of competing hypotheses for the annuity puzzle," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 75-91.
    16. Bruce J. Sherrick & Peter J. Barry & Paul N. Ellinger & Gary D. Schnitkey, 2004. "Factors Influencing Farmers' Crop Insurance Decisions," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(1), pages 103-114.
    17. Yang, Wendong & Sun, Shaolong & Hao, Yan & Wang, Shouyang, 2022. "A novel machine learning-based electricity price forecasting model based on optimal model selection strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    18. Luisa Menapace & Gregory Colson & Roberta Raffaelli, 2016. "A comparison of hypothetical risk attitude elicitation instruments for explaining farmer crop insurance purchases," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 43(1), pages 113-135.
    19. Kim Anh Thi Nguyen & Tram Anh Thi Nguyen & Brice M. Nguelifack & Curtis M. Jolly, 2022. "Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Willingness to Pay for Shrimp Insurance in Vietnam," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37(2), pages 155-182.
    20. Roel Henckaerts & Marie-Pier Côté & Katrien Antonio & Roel Verbelen, 2021. "Boosting Insights in Insurance Tariff Plans with Tree-Based Machine Learning Methods," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 255-285, April.
    21. Geoffroy Enjolras & Patrick Sentis, 2011. "Crop insurance policies and purchases in France," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 42(4), pages 475-486, July.
    22. Trestini, Samuel & Giampietri, Elisa & Smiglak-Krajewska, Magdalena, 2018. "Farmer behaviour towards the agricultural risk management tools provided by the CAP: a comparison between Italy and Poland," 162nd Seminar, April 26-27, 2018, Budapest, Hungary 271978, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mbonane, Nobuhle Duduzile, 2018. "An analysis of farmers’ preferences for crop insurance: a case of maize farmers in Swaziland," Research Theses 334771, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    2. Giampietri, Elisa & Yu, Xiaohua & Trestini, Samuele, 2020. "The role of trust and perceived barriers on farmer’s intention to adopt risk management tools," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 9(1), April.
    3. Richard KOENIG & Marielle BRUNETTE, 2023. "Subjective barriers and determinants to crop insurance adoption," Working Papers of BETA 2023-25, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    4. Fabio G., Santeramo & Ilaria, Russo & Emilia, Lamonaca, 2022. "Italian subsidised crop insurance: what the role of policy changes," MPRA Paper 115299, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Dragos, Cristian Mihai & Dragos, Simona Laura & Mare, Codruta & Muresan, Gabriela Mihaela & Purcel, Alexandra-Anca, 2023. "Does risk assessment and specific knowledge impact crop insurance underwriting? Evidence from Romanian farmers," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 343-358.
    6. F. G. Santeramo & B. K. Goodwin & F. Adinolfi & F. Capitanio, 2016. "Farmer Participation, Entry and Exit Decisions in the Italian Crop Insurance Programme," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 639-657, September.
    7. Marco Rogna & Günter Schamel & Alex Weissensteiner, 2023. "Modelling the switch from hail insurance to antihail nets," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(1), pages 118-136, January.
    8. Dimitar Nikolov & Sergio Gomez-y-Paloma & Minka Chopeva & Marianne Lefebvre, 2014. "Main Factors of the Development and Attractiveness of the Insurance Market for the Agricultural Companies," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 99-121.
    9. H. Holly Wang & Lu Liu & David L. Ortega & Yu Jiang & Qiujie Zheng, 2020. "Are smallholder farmers willing to pay for different types of crop insurance? An application of labelled choice experiments to Chinese corn growers," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 45(1), pages 86-110, January.
    10. Ruggiero Rippo & Simone Cerroni, 2023. "Farmers' participation in the Income Stabilisation Tool: Evidence from the apple sector in Italy," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 273-294, February.
    11. Liu, Xianglin & Tang, Yingmei & Miranda, Mario J., 2015. "Does Past Experience in Natural Disasters Affect Willingness-to-Pay for Weather Index Insurance? Evidence from China," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205374, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Robert Finger & Nadja El Benni, 2021. "Farm income in European agriculture: new perspectives on measurement and implications for policy evaluation," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(2), pages 253-265.
    13. Williams Ali & Awudu Abdulai & Renan Goetz & Victor Owusu, 2021. "Risk, ambiguity and willingness to participate in crop insurance programs: Evidence from a field experiment," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(3), pages 679-703, July.
    14. Fabio G Santeramo, 2019. "I Learn, You Learn, We Gain Experience in Crop Insurance Markets," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(2), pages 284-304, June.
    15. Ramsey, Austin Ford & Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano, 2017. "Crop Insurance in the European Union: Lessons and Caution from the United States," MPRA Paper 79164, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Salazar, Cesar & Jaime, Marcela & Pinto, Cristian & Acuna, Andres, 2019. "Interaction between crop insurance and technology adoption decisions: The case of wheat farmers in Chile," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(3), July.
    17. Giuseppe Timpanaro & Gaetano Chinnici & Roberta Selvaggi & Giulio Cascone & Vera Teresa Foti & Alessandro Scuderi, 2023. "Farmer?s adoption of agricultural insurance for Mediterranean crops as an innovative behavior," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 25(2), pages 155-188.
    18. Möhring, Niklas & Dalhaus, Tobias & Enjolras, Geoffroy & Finger, Robert, 2020. "Crop insurance and pesticide use in European agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    19. Budhathoki, Nanda Kaji & Lassa, Jonatan A. & Pun, Sirish & Zander, Kerstin K., 2019. "Farmers’ interest and willingness-to-pay for index-based crop insurance in the lowlands of Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1-10.
    20. Vigani, Mauro & Khafagy, Amr & Berry, Robert, 2024. "Public spending for agricultural risk management: Land use, regional welfare and intra-subsidy substitution," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:19:p:3625-:d:932947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.