IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i7p1008-d1430476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the Analytic Network Process and the Best–Worst Method in Ranking Urban Resilience and Regeneration Prioritization by Applying Geographic Information Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Javad Hosseini

    (Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan 39998-81551, Iran)

  • Mojtaba Shakeryari

    (Environmental Science, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417935840, Iran)

  • Amir Nazari Nejad

    (Surveying Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Chalus 1477893855, Iran)

  • Hamed Mastalizadeh

    (Geography and Urban Planning, Sistan & Baluchestan University, Zabul 9816745785, Iran)

  • Mohammad Maleki

    (Remote Sensing & Geographic Information System, Kharazmi University, Tehran 1571914911, Iran)

  • Junye Wang

    (Faculty of Science and Technology, Athabasca University, Athabasca, AB T9S 3A3, Canada)

  • Rabee Rustum

    (Dubai Campus, Heriot-Watt University, Dubai P.O. Box 501745, United Arab Emirates)

  • Mahdis Rahmati

    (Remote Sensing & Geographic Information System, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 1148963537, Iran)

  • Fereshteh Doostvandi

    (Department of Geography, Razi University, Kermanshah 6714414971, Iran)

  • Mir Abolfazl Mostafavi

    (Department of Geomatics Sciences, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada)

Abstract

Urbanization without planning causes concerns about biodiversity loss, congestion, housing, and ecosystem sustainability in developing countries. Therefore, resilience and regeneration following urbanization are critical to city planning and sustainable development. Integrating multi-criteria decision-making methods (MCDM) with geographic information systems (GIS) can be a promising method for analyzing city resilience and regeneration. This study aims to use two MCDMs, the Analytic Network Process (ANP) and the Best–Worst Method (BWM), to evaluate the resilience of metropolitan neighborhoods in Tehran. Fourteen criteria were selected to represent the city’s resilience, and the weights of two models were evaluated for their spatial patterns using GIS. The results showed that the building age was the most important criterion in both methods, while the per capita green space was the least important criterion. The weights of the most important criterion, the building age, for the ANP and BWM, were 19.56 and 18.98, respectively, while the weights of the least important criterion, the per capita green space, were 2.197 and 1.655, respectively. Therefore, the MCDM with GIS provides an approach for assessing city resilience and regeneration priority.

Suggested Citation

  • Javad Hosseini & Mojtaba Shakeryari & Amir Nazari Nejad & Hamed Mastalizadeh & Mohammad Maleki & Junye Wang & Rabee Rustum & Mahdis Rahmati & Fereshteh Doostvandi & Mir Abolfazl Mostafavi, 2024. "Comparison of the Analytic Network Process and the Best–Worst Method in Ranking Urban Resilience and Regeneration Prioritization by Applying Geographic Information Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1008-:d:1430476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1008/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1008/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simona Andreea Apostu & Valentina Vasile & Razvan Vasile & Joanna Rosak-Szyrocka, 2022. "Do Smart Cities Represent the Key to Urban Resilience? Rethinking Urban Resilience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2006. "Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-0-387-33987-0, April.
    3. Masaeli, N. & Afshari, E. & Baniasadi, E. & Baharlou-Houreh, N. & Ghaedamini, M., 2023. "Experimental analysis of water transfer and thermal–hydraulic performance of membrane humidifiers with three flow field designs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    4. A. Jasrotia & Abinash Majhi & Sunil Singh, 2009. "Water Balance Approach for Rainwater Harvesting using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques, Jammu Himalaya, India," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(14), pages 3035-3055, November.
    5. Mahdi Rashidi & Seyed-Mohammad Seyedhosseini & Ali Naderan, 2023. "Defining Psychological Factors of Cycling in Tehran City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Kiambi, Stella & Alarcon, Pablo & Rushton, Jonathan & Murungi, Maurice K. & Muinde, Patrick & Akoko, James & Aboge, Gabriel & Gikonyo, Stephen & Momanyi, Kelvin & Kang'ethe, Erastus K. & Fèvre, Eric M, 2018. "Mapping Nairobi's dairy food system: An essential analysis for policy, industry and research," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 47-60.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jha, Madan K. & Chowdary, V.M. & Kulkarni, Y. & Mal, B.C., 2014. "Rainwater harvesting planning using geospatial techniques and multicriteria decision analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 96-111.
    2. Kuldeep Tiwari & Rohit Goyal & Archana Sarkar, 2018. "GIS-based Methodology for Identification of Suitable Locations for Rainwater Harvesting Structures," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(5), pages 1811-1825, March.
    3. Ali Aghazadeh Ardebili & Elio Padoano & Antonella Longo & Antonio Ficarella, 2022. "The Risky-Opportunity Analysis Method (ROAM) to Support Risk-Based Decisions in a Case-Study of Critical Infrastructure Digitization," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Ester Guijarro & Cristina Santadreu-Mascarell & Beatriz Blasco-Gallego & Lourdes Canós-Darós & Eugenia Babiloni, 2021. "On the Identification of the Key Factors for a Successful Use of Twitter as a Medium from a Social Marketing Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Babak Daneshvar Rouyendegh & Asil Oztekin & Joseph Ekong & Ali Dag, 2019. "Measuring the efficiency of hospitals: a fully-ranking DEA–FAHP approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 278(1), pages 361-378, July.
    6. Clara Champalle & James D. Ford & Mya Sherman, 2015. "Prioritizing Climate Change Adaptations in Canadian Arctic Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-25, July.
    7. Afsaneh Afzali & Soheil Sabri & M. Rashid & Jamal Mohammad Vali Samani & Ahmad Ludin, 2014. "Inter-Municipal Landfill Site Selection Using Analytic Network Process," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(8), pages 2179-2194, June.
    8. Baffoe, Gideon, 2019. "Exploring the utility of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in ranking livelihood activities for effective and sustainable rural development interventions in developing countries," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 197-204.
    9. Sedigheh Meimandi Parizi & Mohammad Taleai & Ayyoob Sharifi, 2022. "A GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Analysis Framework to Evaluate Urban Physical Resilience against Earthquakes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-31, April.
    10. Patrícia Janošková & Filip Bajza & Katarína Repková-Štofková & Zuzana Štofková & Erika Loučanová, 2024. "Business Models of Public Smart Services for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-36, August.
    11. Nikola Kadoić & Nina Begičević Ređep & Blaženka Divjak, 2018. "A new method for strategic decision-making in higher education," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(3), pages 611-628, September.
    12. Chi-Yo Huang & Pei-Han Chung & Joseph Z. Shyu & Yao-Hua Ho & Chao-Hsin Wu & Ming-Che Lee & Ming-Jenn Wu, 2018. "Evaluation and Selection of Materials for Particulate Matter MEMS Sensors by Using Hybrid MCDM Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-35, September.
    13. Lin, Jen-Jia & Wei, Yi-Hsuan, 2018. "Assessing area-wide bikeability: A grey analytic network process," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 381-396.
    14. Oryani, Bahareh & Koo, Yoonmo & Rezania, Shahabaldin & Shafiee, Afsaneh, 2021. "Barriers to renewable energy technologies penetration: Perspective in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 971-983.
    15. Ravi Kumar Gedela & K. Krishna Mohan & V. Kamakshi Prasad, 2018. "Application of BOCR models in service oriented architecture (SOA): study on model validation through quantification for QoS considerations," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(6), pages 1346-1354, December.
    16. Roberto Cervelló-Royo & Marina Segura & Regina García-Pérez & Baldomero Segura-García del Río, 2021. "An Analysis of Preferences in Housing Demand by Means of a Multicriteria Methodology (AHP). A More Sustainable Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Jing-Wei Liu & Che-Wei Chang & Yao-Ji Wang & Yi-Hui Liu, 2022. "Constructing a Decision Model for Health Club Members to Purchase Coaching Programs during the COVID-19 Epidemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-13, October.
    18. Wang, Qi & Zhang, Dengkui & Zhou, Xujiao & Mak-Mensah, Erastus & Zhao, Xiaole & Zhao, Wucheng & Wang, Xiaoyun & Stellmach, Dan & Liu, Qinglin & Li, Xiaoling & Li, Guang & Wang, Heling & Zhang, Kai, 2022. "Optimum planting configuration for alfalfa production with ridge-furrow rainwater harvesting in a semiarid region of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    19. Patricija Bajec & Danijela Tuljak-Suban, 2022. "A Strategic Approach for Promoting Sustainable Crowdshipping in Last-Mile Deliveries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Oana Oprisan & Speranta Pirciog & Alina Elena Ionascu & Cristina Lincaru & Adriana Grigorescu, 2023. "Economic Resilience and Sustainable Finance Path to Development and Convergence in Romanian Counties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1008-:d:1430476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.