IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13508-d947116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Strategic Approach for Promoting Sustainable Crowdshipping in Last-Mile Deliveries

Author

Listed:
  • Patricija Bajec

    (Faculty of Maritime Studies and Transport, University of Ljubljana, Pot pomorscakov 4, 6320 Portoroz, Slovenia)

  • Danijela Tuljak-Suban

    (Faculty of Maritime Studies and Transport, University of Ljubljana, Pot pomorscakov 4, 6320 Portoroz, Slovenia)

Abstract

Extending last-mile delivery services to individuals—crowdshippers who pick up or deliver a shipment as part of their daily activities—has sustainable benefits, but also risks (damaged parcels, late deliveries, increased emissions) for various stakeholders. So far, developed crowdshipping models have only addressed one or two risks at a time. No model promotes environmental goals separately or together with other goals. This study proposes a crowdshipping model that consists of three stakeholders (the owner of a crowdshipping platform, crowdshippers and parcel providers) and with various incentives aims to maximise the profitability of the platform and the compensation of crowdshippers, the quality of delivery, and to minimise environmental externalities. A two-level leader–follower game and the concept of Shapley value, from cooperative flow games at the follower level, are used to define the optimal strategy that provides sustainable delivery with a good balance between costs and profits. The game behaviour was explained on a crowdshipping platform provider (leader) and two coalitions: individual crowdshippers and parcel logistics providers. The aim of the example is to explain the strategy of promoting environmentally friendly parcel delivery. The results show satisfactory economic, social and environmental performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricija Bajec & Danijela Tuljak-Suban, 2022. "A Strategic Approach for Promoting Sustainable Crowdshipping in Last-Mile Deliveries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13508-:d:947116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13508/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13508/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michele D. Simoni & Edoardo Marcucci & Valerio Gatta & Christian G. Claudel, 2020. "Potential last-mile impacts of crowdshipping services: a simulation-based evaluation," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1933-1954, August.
    2. Ehud Kalai & Eitan Zemel, 1988. "On The Order of Eliminating Dominated Strategies," Discussion Papers 789, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    3. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2006. "Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-0-387-33987-0, April.
    4. Naima Saeed & Odd I Larsen, 2010. "Container terminal concessions: A game theory application to the case of the ports of Pakistan," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 12(3), pages 237-262, September.
    5. Quan Dai & Hongfei Jia & Yao Liu, 2020. "Private vehicle-based crowdshipping for intercity express transportation: Feasibility assessment," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 16(2), pages 15501477209, February.
    6. Wei Qi & Lefei Li & Sheng Liu & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2018. "Shared Mobility for Last-Mile Delivery: Design, Operational Prescriptions, and Environmental Impact," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 737-751, October.
    7. Thomas L. Saaty, 2006. "The Analytic Network Process," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process, chapter 0, pages 1-26, Springer.
    8. Le, Tho V. & Ukkusuri, Satish V. & Xue, Jiawei & Van Woensel, Tom, 2021. "Designing pricing and compensation schemes by integrating matching and routing models for crowd-shipping systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    9. Punel, Aymeric & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2017. "Modeling the acceptability of crowdsourced goods deliveries: Role of context and experience effects," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 18-38.
    10. Shichang Pan & Lele Zhang & Russell G. Thompson & Hadi Ghaderi, 2021. "A parcel network flow approach for joint delivery networks using parcel lockers," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(7), pages 2090-2115, April.
    11. Li, Baoxiang & Krushinsky, Dmitry & Reijers, Hajo A. & Van Woensel, Tom, 2014. "The Share-a-Ride Problem: People and parcels sharing taxis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 31-40.
    12. Allahviranloo, Mahdieh & Baghestani, Amirhossein, 2019. "A dynamic crowdshipping model and daily travel behavior," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 175-190.
    13. Kafle, Nabin & Zou, Bo & Lin, Jane, 2017. "Design and modeling of a crowdsource-enabled system for urban parcel relay and delivery," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 62-82.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tapia, Rodrigo J. & Kourounioti, Ioanna & Thoen, Sebastian & de Bok, Michiel & Tavasszy, Lori, 2023. "A disaggregate model of passenger-freight matching in crowdshipping services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Pourrahmani, Elham & Jaller, Miguel, 2021. "Crowdshipping in last mile deliveries: Operational challenges and research opportunities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Ghaderi, Hadi & Zhang, Lele & Tsai, Pei-Wei & Woo, Jihoon, 2022. "Crowdsourced last-mile delivery with parcel lockers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    4. Nils Boysen & Stefan Fedtke & Stefan Schwerdfeger, 2021. "Last-mile delivery concepts: a survey from an operational research perspective," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 1-58, March.
    5. Martin W.P Savelsbergh & Marlin W. Ulmer, 2022. "Challenges and opportunities in crowdsourced delivery planning and operations," 4OR, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Mancini, Simona & Gansterer, Margaretha, 2022. "Bundle generation for last-mile delivery with occasional drivers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Parvez Farazi, Nahid & Zou, Bo & Tulabandhula, Theja, 2022. "Dynamic On-Demand Crowdshipping Using Constrained and Heuristics-Embedded Double Dueling Deep Q-Network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    8. He, Shan & Dai, Ying & Ma, Zu-Jun, 2023. "To offer or not to offer? The optimal value-insured strategy for crowdsourced delivery platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    9. Fehn, Fabian & Engelhardt, Roman & Dandl, Florian & Bogenberger, Klaus & Busch, Fritz, 2023. "Integrating parcel deliveries into a ride-pooling service—An agent-based simulation study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    10. Alnaggar, Aliaa & Gzara, Fatma & Bookbinder, James H., 2021. "Crowdsourced delivery: A review of platforms and academic literature," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    11. Behrend, Moritz & Meisel, Frank & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Andersson, Henrik, 2019. "An exact solution method for the capacitated item-sharing and crowdshipping problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 589-604.
    12. Akbar, Usman & Jain, Avi Anand & Bråthen, Svein, 2024. "Sustainability assessment of inter-urban crowdshipping - A case study approach," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Shen, Hui & Lin, Jane, 2020. "Investigation of crowdshipping delivery trip production with real-world data," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    14. Michele D. Simoni & Edoardo Marcucci & Valerio Gatta & Christian G. Claudel, 2020. "Potential last-mile impacts of crowdshipping services: a simulation-based evaluation," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1933-1954, August.
    15. Junyu Cao & Mariana Olvera-Cravioto & Zuo-Jun (Max) Shen, 2020. "Last-Mile Shared Delivery: A Discrete Sequential Packing Approach," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 1466-1497, November.
    16. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G. & Lavieri, Patricia Sauri, 2024. "Public transportation-based crowd-shipping initiatives: Are users willing to participate? Why not?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    17. Boysen, Nils & Emde, Simon & Schwerdfeger, Stefan, 2022. "Crowdshipping by employees of distribution centers: Optimization approaches for matching supply and demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 539-556.
    18. Behrend, Moritz & Meisel, Frank & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Andersson, Henrik, 2021. "A multi-period analysis of the integrated item-sharing and crowdshipping problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 483-499.
    19. Fessler, Andreas & Thorhauge, Mikkel & Mabit, Stefan & Haustein, Sonja, 2022. "A public transport-based crowdshipping concept as a sustainable last-mile solution: Assessing user preferences with a stated choice experiment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 210-223.
    20. Ali Aghazadeh Ardebili & Elio Padoano & Antonella Longo & Antonio Ficarella, 2022. "The Risky-Opportunity Analysis Method (ROAM) to Support Risk-Based Decisions in a Case-Study of Critical Infrastructure Digitization," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13508-:d:947116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.