IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v266y2022ics037837742200141x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimum planting configuration for alfalfa production with ridge-furrow rainwater harvesting in a semiarid region of China

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Qi
  • Zhang, Dengkui
  • Zhou, Xujiao
  • Mak-Mensah, Erastus
  • Zhao, Xiaole
  • Zhao, Wucheng
  • Wang, Xiaoyun
  • Stellmach, Dan
  • Liu, Qinglin
  • Li, Xiaoling
  • Li, Guang
  • Wang, Heling
  • Zhang, Kai

Abstract

Soil desiccation is a major challenge faced by subsistence farmers growing alfalfa (Medicago sativa L) in consecutive cultivation in semiarid regions. We hypothesized that alfalfa fodder yield would increase with the length of growing season, growing degree-days, and rainfall. A field experiment was conducted on alfalfa production from 2012 to 2016 to 1) determine the response of fodder yield to rainfall, the length of growing season, and accumulated growing degree day (AGDD) in different growing-cutting stage (GCS)s; 2) obtain the suitable mulching material and the optimum ridge width for ridges with manually compacted soil (MCS), mulched with bio-degradable film (BF), and plastic film (PF). There were 10 treatments (3 ridge widths × 3 ridge-mulching materials + flat planting (FP) as control) with three replications laid in a randomized block design. The ratio of the first GCS to the second GCS in fodder yield ranged from 1.10 to 4.55, which was similar to the ratio of the first GCS to the third GCS in fodder yield ranged from 1.14 to 4.59, although rainfall, the length of growing season, and AGDD were different during the two or three GCSs. The highest fodder yield was obtained from the first GCS in one year and reached the highest level in the second growing year, and maintained a similar level in the subsequent years, although rainfall, the length of growing season, and AGDD varied during the five year periods. Fodder yield was affected by both the rainfall in the GCS and the available soil moisture prior to the GCS. Compared to FP, the increase of evapotranspiration for MCS, BF, and PF was 11, 61, and 63 mm, respectively. Fodder yield for BF and PF increased by 28% and 33%, respectively. Fodder yield for MCS maintained the same level as that for FP. Evapotranspiration increased and fodder yield decreased as ridge width increased. The optimum ridge width for MCS, BF, and PF was 29, 39, and 37 cm, respectively, across five years. Future study should focus on alfalfa-crop rotation to mitigate soil desiccation after alfalfa consecutively production.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Qi & Zhang, Dengkui & Zhou, Xujiao & Mak-Mensah, Erastus & Zhao, Xiaole & Zhao, Wucheng & Wang, Xiaoyun & Stellmach, Dan & Liu, Qinglin & Li, Xiaoling & Li, Guang & Wang, Heling & Zhang, Kai, 2022. "Optimum planting configuration for alfalfa production with ridge-furrow rainwater harvesting in a semiarid region of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:266:y:2022:i:c:s037837742200141x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837742200141X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107594?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Jasrotia & Abinash Majhi & Sunil Singh, 2009. "Water Balance Approach for Rainwater Harvesting using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques, Jammu Himalaya, India," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(14), pages 3035-3055, November.
    2. Montazar, A. & Sadeghi, M., 2008. "Effects of applied water and sprinkler irrigation uniformity on alfalfa growth and hay yield," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1279-1287, November.
    3. Wang, X.C. & Muhammad, T.N. & Hao, M.D. & Li, J., 2011. "Sustainable recovery of soil desiccation in semi-humid region on the Loess Plateau," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(8), pages 1262-1270, May.
    4. Adham, Ammar & Wesseling, Jan G. & Riksen, Michel & Ouessar, Mohamed & Ritsema, Coen J., 2016. "A water harvesting model for optimizing rainwater harvesting in the wadi Oum Zessar watershed, Tunisia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 191-202.
    5. Li, X.-Y. & Zhao, W.-W. & Song, Y.-X. & Wang, W. & Zhang, X.-Y., 2008. "Rainfall harvesting on slopes using contour furrows with plastic-covered transverse ridges for growing Caragana korshinskii in the semiarid region of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(5), pages 539-544, May.
    6. Huang, Ze & Liu, Yu & Qiu, Kaiyang & López-Vicente, Manuel & Shen, Weibo & Wu, Gao-Lin, 2021. "Soil-water deficit in deep soil layers results from the planted forest in a semi-arid sandy land: Implications for sustainable agroforestry water management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liao, Zhenqi & Zhang, Chen & Yu, Shuolei & Lai, Zhenlin & Wang, Haidong & Zhang, Fucang & Li, Zhijun & Wu, Peng & Fan, Junliang, 2023. "Ridge-furrow planting with black film mulching increases rainfed summer maize production by improving resources utilization on the Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jha, Madan K. & Chowdary, V.M. & Kulkarni, Y. & Mal, B.C., 2014. "Rainwater harvesting planning using geospatial techniques and multicriteria decision analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 96-111.
    2. Kuldeep Tiwari & Rohit Goyal & Archana Sarkar, 2018. "GIS-based Methodology for Identification of Suitable Locations for Rainwater Harvesting Structures," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(5), pages 1811-1825, March.
    3. Duan, Chenxiao & Chen, Guangjie & Hu, Yajin & Wu, Shufang & Feng, Hao & Dong, Qin’ge, 2021. "Alternating wide ridges and narrow furrows with film mulching improves soil hydrothermal conditions and maize water use efficiency in dry sub-humid regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    4. Mo, Fei & Wang, Jian-Yong & Ren, Hong-Xu & Sun, Guo-Jun & Kavagi, Levis & Zhou, Hong & Nguluu, Simon N. & Gicheru, Patrick & Cheruiyot, Kiprotich W. & Xiong, You-Cai, 2018. "Environmental and economic benefits of micro–field rain–harvesting farming system at maize (Zea mays L.) field scale in semiarid east African Plateau," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 102-112.
    5. Glendenning, C.J. & van Ogtrop, F.F. & Mishra, A.K. & Vervoort, R.W., 2012. "Balancing watershed and local scale impacts of rain water harvesting in India—A review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-13.
    6. Ray-Shyan Wu & Gabriela Lucia Letona Molina & Fiaz Hussain, 2018. "Optimal Sites Identification for Rainwater Harvesting in Northeastern Guatemala by Analytical Hierarchy Process," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(12), pages 4139-4153, September.
    7. Vema, Vamsikrishna & Sudheer, K.P. & Chaubey, I., 2019. "Fuzzy inference system for site suitability evaluation of water harvesting structures in rainfed regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 82-93.
    8. Hongfei Zhao & Hongming He & Jingjing Wang & Chunyu Bai & Chuangjuan Zhang, 2018. "Vegetation Restoration and Its Environmental Effects on the Loess Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Xuerui Gao & Ai Wang & Yong Zhao & Xining Zhao & Miao Sun & Junkai Du & Chengcheng Gang, 2018. "Study on Water Suitability of Apple Plantations in the Loess Plateau under Climate Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, November.
    10. Ismail Chenini & Abdallah Mammou & Moufida El May, 2010. "Groundwater Recharge Zone Mapping Using GIS-Based Multi-criteria Analysis: A Case Study in Central Tunisia (Maknassy Basin)," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(5), pages 921-939, March.
    11. Warnke, Adam H. & Ruhland, Christopher T., 2016. "The effects of harvest regime, irrigation, and salinity on stem lignocellulose concentrations in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 234-242.
    12. Yan Li & Derong Su, 2017. "Alfalfa Water Use and Yield under Different Sprinkler Irrigation Regimes in North Arid Regions of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    13. R. Mazza & F. La Vigna & C. Alimonti, 2014. "Evaluating the Available Regional Groundwater Resources Using the Distributed Hydrogeological Budget," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(3), pages 749-765, February.
    14. Xiao, Yu & Zhang, Jing & Jia, Ting Ting & Pang, Xiao Pan & Guo, Zheng Gang, 2015. "Effects of alternate furrow irrigation on the biomass and quality of alfalfa (Medicago sativa)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 147-154.
    15. Michał Napierała & Mariusz Sojka & Joanna Jaskuła, 2023. "Impact of Water Meadow Restoration on Forage Hay Production in Different Hydro-Meteorological Conditions: A Case Study of Racot, Central Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    16. Bai, Youshuai & Zhang, Hengjia & Jia, Shenghai & Huang, Caixia & Zhao, Xia & Wei, Huiqin & Yang, Shurui & Ma, Yan & Kou, Rui, 2022. "Plastic film mulching combined with sand tube irrigation improved yield, water use efficiency, and fruit quality of jujube in an arid desert area of Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    17. Md. Islam & F. Chou & M. Kabir & C. Liaw, 2010. "Rainwater: A Potential Alternative Source for Scarce Safe Drinking and Arsenic Contaminated Water in Bangladesh," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(14), pages 3987-4008, November.
    18. Yildirim, Demet & Cemek, Bilal & Unlukara, Ali, 2022. "The effect of mulched ridge and furrow micro catchment water harvesting on red pepper yield and quality features in Bafra Plain of Northern Turkey," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    19. Chi-Hsiang Wang & Jane Blackmore, 2012. "Supply–Demand Risk and Resilience Assessment for Household Rainwater Harvesting in Melbourne, Australia," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(15), pages 4381-4396, December.
    20. Javad Hosseini & Mojtaba Shakeryari & Amir Nazari Nejad & Hamed Mastalizadeh & Mohammad Maleki & Junye Wang & Rabee Rustum & Mahdis Rahmati & Fereshteh Doostvandi & Mir Abolfazl Mostafavi, 2024. "Comparison of the Analytic Network Process and the Best–Worst Method in Ranking Urban Resilience and Regeneration Prioritization by Applying Geographic Information Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:266:y:2022:i:c:s037837742200141x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.