IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i2p148-d1327535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attractiveness Assessment Model for Evaluating an Area for a Potential Geopark—Case Study: Hațeg UNESCO Global Geopark (Romania)

Author

Listed:
  • Judith Nyulas

    (Faculty of Geography, Doctoral School of Geography, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Ștefan Dezsi

    (Department of Human Geography and Tourism, Faculty of Geography, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
    Center for Research on Settlements and Urbanism, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Ionel Haidu

    (Laboratory LOTERR-EA 7304, Department of Geography, University of Lorraine, 57045 Metz, France)

  • Zsolt Magyari-Sáska

    (Faculty of Geography, Gheorgheni University Extension, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Adrian Niță

    (Faculty of Geography, Gheorgheni University Extension, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

Many studies have developed methods for assessing attractiveness, but the question is which one should be used to evaluate geopark designated areas? Therefore, the aim of this study is to find suitable criteria for assessing the attractiveness of a natural area such as a geopark in order to find the best quantifiable method as a methodological guide to evaluate attractiveness. The principle of the methodology takes into account three facts: the use of available attractiveness methods elaborated over time, the UNESCO Global Geoparks (UGGp) geopark requirements, and a certified geopark (Haţeg UNESCO Global Geopark was chosen as etalon—benchmark), then matching these together. To this end, the following specific objectives have been set: (i) an inventory of factors used to estimate attractiveness; (ii) through analysis, identifying the appropriate evaluation criteria for the field (a set for criteria’s SMART parameter, which can be clearly expressed, quantitatively measurable, and achievable); and (iii) developing a methodological guideline for geopark attractiveness assessment. The methodology is based on an analytical thinking approach, builds on the experience of existing methods, and stands out by the attributes matched to the UGGp’s evaluation criteria using the certified geopark as a benchmark. The result itself presents a method for assessing the attractiveness of geoparks. The outcome offers the attractiveness suitability for new geopark-designated areas as well as for existing geoparks aspiring to UNESCO certification.

Suggested Citation

  • Judith Nyulas & Ștefan Dezsi & Ionel Haidu & Zsolt Magyari-Sáska & Adrian Niță, 2024. "Attractiveness Assessment Model for Evaluating an Area for a Potential Geopark—Case Study: Hațeg UNESCO Global Geopark (Romania)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:148-:d:1327535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/2/148/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/2/148/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marko D. Petrović & Ilija Milovanović & Tamara Gajić & Veronika N. Kholina & Miroslav Vujičić & Ivana Blešić & Filip Đoković & Milan M. Radovanović & Nina B. Ćurčić & Al Fauzi Rahmat & Karlygash Muzdy, 2023. "The Degree of Environmental Risk and Attractiveness as a Criterion for Visiting a Tourist Destination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Miriam Edith Pérez-Romero & José Álvarez-García & Martha Beatriz Flores-Romero & Donaji Jiménez-Islas, 2023. "UNESCO Global Geoparks 22 Years after Their Creation: Analysis of Scientific Production," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Laura Valentini & Veronica Guerra & Olivia Nesci, 2023. "The Mt. Catria–Mt. Nerone Ridge in the North-Marchean Apennines (Central Italy): A Potential Geopark?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-28, July.
    4. Fangnan Cui & Yaolong Liu & Yuanyuan Chang & Jin Duan & Jizu Li, 2016. "An overview of tourism risk perception," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(1), pages 643-658, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tamara Gajić & Larisa A. Minasyan & Marko D. Petrović & Victor A. Bakhtin & Anna V. Kaneeva & Narine L. Wiegel, 2023. "Travelers’ (in)Resilience to Environmental Risks Emphasized in the Media and Their Redirecting to Medical Destinations: Enhancing Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Hongjuan Song & Yushi Jiang, 2019. "Dynamic pricing decisions by potential tourists under uncertainty: The effects of tourism advertising," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(2), pages 213-234, March.
    3. Mohammad Rashed Hasan Polas & Ratul Kumar Saha & Mosab I. Tabash, 2022. "How does tourist perception lead to tourist hesitation? Empirical evidence from Bangladesh," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3659-3686, March.
    4. Herjanto, Halimin & Amin, Muslim & Purington, Elizabeth F., 2021. "Panic buying: The effect of thinking style and situational ambiguity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    5. Zafar, Abaid Ullah & Shahzad, Mohsin & Ashfaq, Muhammad & Shahzad, Khuram, 2023. "Forecasting impulsive consumers driven by macro-influencers posts: Intervention of followers' flow state and perceived informativeness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    6. Hao Zhang & Taeyoung Cho & Huanjiong Wang, 2019. "The Impact of a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense Incident on Tourism Risk Perception and Attitude Change of Chinese Tourists Traveling to South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Pia Antoinette Plank & Luís Filipe Gomes & Paulo Caldas & Miguel Varela & Diogo Cunha Ferreira, 2023. "Assessing the Traveling Risks Perceived by South African Travelers during Pandemic Outbreaks: The Case of COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-32, June.
    8. Tamara Gajić & Marko D. Petrović & Ivana Blešić & Milan M. Radovanović & Ana Spasojević & Dejan Sekulić & Mirjana Penić & Dunja Demirović Bajrami & Denis A. Dubover, 2024. "The Contribution of the Farm to Table Concept to the Sustainable Development of Agritourism Homesteads," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-26, August.
    9. Pedro Cadenas & Henryk Gzyl, 2021. "Diversification Can Control Probability of Default or Risk, but Not Both," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-10, February.
    10. Feng Xu & Xuejiao Lin & Shuaishuai Li & Wenxia Niu, 2018. "Is Southern Xinjiang Really Unsafe?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Zbyn?k ?koda, 2021. "Options UAV applications in the construction industry using photogrammetry," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 12713400, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    12. Mohammad Shabib Khasawneh & Ashraf Mohammad Alfandi, 2019. "Determining behaviour intentions from the overall destination image and risk perception," Tourism and Hospitality Management, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, vol. 25(2), pages 355-375, December.
    13. repec:eur:ejserj:634 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. You-Hai Lu & Peixue Liu & Xiaowan Zhang & Jun Zhang & Caiyun Shen, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Differences in the Effect of Epidemic Risk Perception on Potential Travel Intention: A Macropsychology-Based Risk Perception Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    15. Marko D. Petrović & Ilija Milovanović & Tamara Gajić & Veronika N. Kholina & Miroslav Vujičić & Ivana Blešić & Filip Đoković & Milan M. Radovanović & Nina B. Ćurčić & Al Fauzi Rahmat & Karlygash Muzdy, 2023. "The Degree of Environmental Risk and Attractiveness as a Criterion for Visiting a Tourist Destination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Kristýna Tuzová & Antonín Vaishar & Milada Šťastná & Martina Urbanová, 2023. "The Impacts of COVID-19 on the Visitor Attendance of Cultural and Natural Heritage: A Case Study of the South Moravian Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    17. Shengxiang She & Yunzhang Tian & Lin Lu & Iveta Eimontaite & Ting Xie & Yan Sun, 2019. "An Exploration of Hiking Risk Perception: Dimensions and Antecedent Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, June.
    18. Judith Nyulas & Ștefan Dezsi & Adrian Niță & Raluca-Andreea Toma & Ana-Maria Lazăr, 2024. "Trends and Future Directions in Analysing Attractiveness of Geoparks Using an Automated Merging Method of Multiple Databases—R-Based Bibliometric Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-30, October.
    19. Siti Nurhidayah Mohd Roslen & Chua Mei Shan & Azlul Kalilah Zaghlol & Rafiatul Adlin Hj Mohd Ruslan, 2023. "Financial Risk and International Inbound Tourism: A Malaysian Illustration," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(3), pages 95-107.
    20. Yanjing Gao & Lijun Chen, 2022. "Impact of COVID-19 Risk Perception on Residents’ Behavioural Intention towards Forest Therapy Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    21. Romina Alkier & Goran Perić & Sandra Dramićanin, 2022. "Travel Risk Perception in a Health Crisis Caused by the Covid-19 Virus: The Case of Serbia," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(5), pages 85-107.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:148-:d:1327535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.