IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i11p1986-d237178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Exploration of Hiking Risk Perception: Dimensions and Antecedent Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Shengxiang She

    (School of Business, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China
    School of Business, Guilin Univesity of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
    Center for Behavior Decision, Shannxi University of Technology, Hanzhong 723000, China)

  • Yunzhang Tian

    (Center for Behavior Decision, Shannxi University of Technology, Hanzhong 723000, China)

  • Lin Lu

    (School of Business, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Iveta Eimontaite

    (Sheffield Robotics, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK)

  • Ting Xie

    (Department of Tourism Management, Beijing Institute of Petro-chemical Technology, Beijing 102617, China)

  • Yan Sun

    (Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

Hiking is a form of green tourism which deserves promotion and popularization, especially in present day China. However, the risks inherent in hiking could have a negative impact on the development of hiking tourism. It is important to better understand how people perceive the risks of hiking and what type of experience attributes they prefer. However, no studies have investigated the nature of risk perception from the perspective of hikers. This study explores the dimensions of the perceived risk of hiking and investigates the associated factors of hiking risk perception as well as hiking preference. A questionnaire with 18 items was used to capture people’s perception of hiking risks, and two groups of samples were surveyed. Generally, this study identified two dimensions of perceived risk towards hiking based on a sample of hikers, i.e., physical risk and psychological risk. Demographic variables such as gender, upbringing background, and hiking frequency were shown to predict hiking risk perception while gender and hiking frequency predicted route preference. The personality trait of sensation seeking appeared to be a significant predictor of hiking preference. These findings lend themselves to market segmentation and marketing strategies on hiking tourism.

Suggested Citation

  • Shengxiang She & Yunzhang Tian & Lin Lu & Iveta Eimontaite & Ting Xie & Yan Sun, 2019. "An Exploration of Hiking Risk Perception: Dimensions and Antecedent Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:11:p:1986-:d:237178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/11/1986/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/11/1986/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fangnan Cui & Yaolong Liu & Yuanyuan Chang & Jin Duan & Jizu Li, 2016. "An overview of tourism risk perception," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(1), pages 643-658, May.
    2. Quintal, Vanessa Ann & Lee, Julie Anne & Soutar, Geoffrey N., 2010. "Risk, uncertainty and the theory of planned behavior: A tourism example," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 797-805.
    3. Casidy, Riza & Wymer, Walter, 2016. "A risk worth taking: Perceived risk as moderator of satisfaction, loyalty, and willingness-to-pay premium price," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 189-197.
    4. Huang, Liyuan & Gursoy, Dogan & Xu, Honggang, 2014. "Impact of personality traits and involvement on prior knowledge," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 42-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tadashi Uno & Masaya Fujino & Atsushi Ohwaki & Masahiro Horiuchi, 2019. "Prevalence of Falls on Mount Fuji and Associated with Risk Factors: A Questionnaire Survey Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-11, October.
    2. Piotr Próchniak, 2022. "Profiles of Wellbeing in Soft and Hard Mountain Hikers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Yunfan Wu & Keita Kinoshita & Yi Zhang & Rena Kagami & Shintaro Sato, 2022. "Influence of COVID-19 Crisis on Motivation and Hiking Intention of Gen Z in China: Perceived Risk and Coping Appraisal as Moderators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Martin Burtscher & Martin Niedermeier & Hannes Gatterer, 2021. "Editorial on the Special Issue on “Mountain Sports Activities: Injuries and Prevention”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-7, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md. Kamrul Hasan & Ahmed Rageh Ismail & MD. Faridul Islam, 2017. "Tourist risk perceptions and revisit intention: A critical review of literature," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1412874-141, January.
    2. Pia Antoinette Plank & Luís Filipe Gomes & Paulo Caldas & Miguel Varela & Diogo Cunha Ferreira, 2023. "Assessing the Traveling Risks Perceived by South African Travelers during Pandemic Outbreaks: The Case of COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-32, June.
    3. Feng Xu & Xuejiao Lin & Shuaishuai Li & Wenxia Niu, 2018. "Is Southern Xinjiang Really Unsafe?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Braun, Erik & Zenker, Sebastian, 2022. "In governments we trust: A two-country Brexit field experiment on perceived uncertainty as mediator for consumer decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 335-346.
    5. Siti Nurhidayah Mohd Roslen & Chua Mei Shan & Azlul Kalilah Zaghlol & Rafiatul Adlin Hj Mohd Ruslan, 2023. "Financial Risk and International Inbound Tourism: A Malaysian Illustration," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(3), pages 95-107.
    6. Romina Alkier & Goran Perić & Sandra Dramićanin, 2022. "Travel Risk Perception in a Health Crisis Caused by the Covid-19 Virus: The Case of Serbia," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(5), pages 85-107.
    7. Wolff, Katharina & Larsen, Svein & Øgaard, Torvald, 2019. "How to define and measure risk perceptions," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    8. Hui Zhu & Fumin Deng, 2020. "How to Influence Rural Tourism Intention by Risk Knowledge during COVID-19 Containment in China: Mediating Role of Risk Perception and Attitude," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Yasser Tawfik Halim & Hazem Tawfik Halim & Mohamed Samy El-Deeb & Samia Adly El Sheikh, 2022. "An empirical investigation into people’s intention to participate in mega events tourism: applying mixture of two behavioral theoretical models," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Bo-Kyeong Kim & Kyoung-Ok Kim, 2020. "Relationship between Viewing Motivation, Presence, Viewing Satisfaction, and Attitude toward Tourism Destinations Based on TV Travel Reality Variety Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, June.
    11. NaHyun Lee & Bong-Seok Kim, 2023. "Differences of Host Country-Destination Image Assessment for International Students According to Risk Perception in COVID-19 Tourism," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    12. Hongjuan Song & Yushi Jiang, 2019. "Dynamic pricing decisions by potential tourists under uncertainty: The effects of tourism advertising," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(2), pages 213-234, March.
    13. Mohammad Rashed Hasan Polas & Ratul Kumar Saha & Mosab I. Tabash, 2022. "How does tourist perception lead to tourist hesitation? Empirical evidence from Bangladesh," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3659-3686, March.
    14. Zeeshan Ahmed & Shahid Rasool & Qasim Saleem & Mubashir Ali Khan & Shamsa Kanwal, 2022. "Mediating Role of Risk Perception Between Behavioral Biases and Investor’s Investment Decisions," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    15. Pipatpong Fakfare & Walanchalee Wattanacharoensil, 2023. "Low‐carbon tourism for island destinations: A crucial alternative for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 180-197, February.
    16. Liu, Chih-Hsing & Gan, Bernard & Ko, Wen-Hwa & Teng, Chih-Ching, 2022. "Comparison of localized and foreign restaurant brands for consumer behavior prediction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Jennifer Heiny & Icek Ajzen & Ingrid-Ute Leonhäuser & Peter Schmidt, 2019. "Intentions to Enhance Tourism in Private Households: Explanation and Mediated Effects of Entrepreneurial Experience," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 5(2), pages 128-148, July.
    18. Peng Shi & Frank Vanclay & Jin Yu, 2022. "Post-Resettlement Support Policies, Psychological Factors, and Farmers’ Homestead Exit Intention and Behavior," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, February.
    19. María Redondo-Carretero & Carmen Camarero-Izquierdo & Ana Gutiérrez-Arranz & Javier Rodríguez-Pinto, 2017. "Language tourism destinations: a case study of motivations, perceived value and tourists’ expenditure," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(2), pages 155-172, May.
    20. Rahman Ummeh Habiba Faria Benteh & Zafar Muhammad Khubaib, 2020. "Factors Influencing Uber Adoption In Bangladesh And Pakistan," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 86-97, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:11:p:1986-:d:237178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.