IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/ibmpro/12713400.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Options UAV applications in the construction industry using photogrammetry

Author

Listed:
  • Zbyn?k ?koda

    (Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Civil Engineering)

Abstract

This paper aims to introduce the possibilities of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in construction. UAVs were the domain of predominantly armies, which sought to develop and use them for military purposes to eliminate human losses, thanks to the possibility of piloting from vast distances. In the last few years, however, the use of UAVs has greatly increased, both among professionals and the public, and is increasingly interfering in the field of civil aviation. An unmanned system is an unmanned aircraft, controlled remotely or capable of flying independently thanks to reprogrammed flight plans and various autonomous systems. After prices have dropped and availability has increased, the range of affordable unmanned systems that are offered to people has increased rapidly, which means that almost anyone can afford an unmanned system today. It is therefore not surprising that although unmanned systems are often used in the military for reconnaissance and offensive flights, they are also used for many civilian tasks, such as firefighting, police surveillance or field reconnaissance, and finally, UAVs find many use cases in civil engineering and construction, which will be presented in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Zbyn?k ?koda, 2021. "Options UAV applications in the construction industry using photogrammetry," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 12713400, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:sek:ibmpro:12713400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/12th-business-management-conference-prague/table-of-content/detail?cid=127&iid=011&rid=13400
    File Function: First version, 2021
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2016. "An overview of monetary systems and exchange rate regimes," Chapters, in: The International Monetary System and the Theory of Monetary Systems, chapter 7, pages 57-60, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Fangnan Cui & Yaolong Liu & Yuanyuan Chang & Jin Duan & Jizu Li, 2016. "An overview of tourism risk perception," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(1), pages 643-658, May.
    3. repec:ces:ifodic:v:14:y:2016:i:3:p:19255706 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Daniela Wech, 2016. "Asylum Applicants in the EU – An Overview," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 14(03), pages 59-64, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongjuan Song & Yushi Jiang, 2019. "Dynamic pricing decisions by potential tourists under uncertainty: The effects of tourism advertising," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(2), pages 213-234, March.
    2. Mohammad Rashed Hasan Polas & Ratul Kumar Saha & Mosab I. Tabash, 2022. "How does tourist perception lead to tourist hesitation? Empirical evidence from Bangladesh," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3659-3686, March.
    3. Herjanto, Halimin & Amin, Muslim & Purington, Elizabeth F., 2021. "Panic buying: The effect of thinking style and situational ambiguity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    4. Zafar, Abaid Ullah & Shahzad, Mohsin & Ashfaq, Muhammad & Shahzad, Khuram, 2023. "Forecasting impulsive consumers driven by macro-influencers posts: Intervention of followers' flow state and perceived informativeness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    5. Hao Zhang & Taeyoung Cho & Huanjiong Wang, 2019. "The Impact of a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense Incident on Tourism Risk Perception and Attitude Change of Chinese Tourists Traveling to South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Pia Antoinette Plank & Luís Filipe Gomes & Paulo Caldas & Miguel Varela & Diogo Cunha Ferreira, 2023. "Assessing the Traveling Risks Perceived by South African Travelers during Pandemic Outbreaks: The Case of COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-32, June.
    7. Pedro Cadenas & Henryk Gzyl, 2021. "Diversification Can Control Probability of Default or Risk, but Not Both," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-10, February.
    8. Feng Xu & Xuejiao Lin & Shuaishuai Li & Wenxia Niu, 2018. "Is Southern Xinjiang Really Unsafe?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Mohammad Shabib Khasawneh & Ashraf Mohammad Alfandi, 2019. "Determining behaviour intentions from the overall destination image and risk perception," Tourism and Hospitality Management, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, vol. 25(2), pages 355-375, December.
    10. Judith Nyulas & Ștefan Dezsi & Ionel Haidu & Zsolt Magyari-Sáska & Adrian Niță, 2024. "Attractiveness Assessment Model for Evaluating an Area for a Potential Geopark—Case Study: Hațeg UNESCO Global Geopark (Romania)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    11. repec:eur:ejserj:634 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. You-Hai Lu & Peixue Liu & Xiaowan Zhang & Jun Zhang & Caiyun Shen, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Differences in the Effect of Epidemic Risk Perception on Potential Travel Intention: A Macropsychology-Based Risk Perception Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    13. Marko D. Petrović & Ilija Milovanović & Tamara Gajić & Veronika N. Kholina & Miroslav Vujičić & Ivana Blešić & Filip Đoković & Milan M. Radovanović & Nina B. Ćurčić & Al Fauzi Rahmat & Karlygash Muzdy, 2023. "The Degree of Environmental Risk and Attractiveness as a Criterion for Visiting a Tourist Destination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Kristýna Tuzová & Antonín Vaishar & Milada Šťastná & Martina Urbanová, 2023. "The Impacts of COVID-19 on the Visitor Attendance of Cultural and Natural Heritage: A Case Study of the South Moravian Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Shengxiang She & Yunzhang Tian & Lin Lu & Iveta Eimontaite & Ting Xie & Yan Sun, 2019. "An Exploration of Hiking Risk Perception: Dimensions and Antecedent Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, June.
    16. Siti Nurhidayah Mohd Roslen & Chua Mei Shan & Azlul Kalilah Zaghlol & Rafiatul Adlin Hj Mohd Ruslan, 2023. "Financial Risk and International Inbound Tourism: A Malaysian Illustration," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(3), pages 95-107.
    17. Yanjing Gao & Lijun Chen, 2022. "Impact of COVID-19 Risk Perception on Residents’ Behavioural Intention towards Forest Therapy Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Romina Alkier & Goran Perić & Sandra Dramićanin, 2022. "Travel Risk Perception in a Health Crisis Caused by the Covid-19 Virus: The Case of Serbia," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(5), pages 85-107.
    19. Gavurova, Beata & Skare, Marinko & Belas, Jaroslav & Rigelsky, Martin & Ivankova, Viera, 2023. "The relationship between destination image and destination safety during technological and social changes COVID-19 pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    20. Shefang Wang & Chaoru Lu & Chenhui Liu & Yue Zhou & Jun Bi & Xiaomei Zhao, 2020. "Understanding the Energy Consumption of Battery Electric Buses in Urban Public Transport Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-12, November.
    21. Peng Cheng & Jiuchang Wei & Yue Ge, 2017. "Who should be blamed? The attribution of responsibility for a city smog event in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(2), pages 669-689, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Drone; UAV; innovation; remotely piloted aircraft; 3D model; photogrammetry;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:ibmpro:12713400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.