IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i11p1788-d1510299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Scenario Simulating the Effects of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Health for Rural Ecological Management in the Zheng–Bian–Luo Rural Area, Central China

Author

Listed:
  • Hejie Wei

    (College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Qing Han

    (College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Yu Ma

    (College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Wenfeng Ji

    (College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Weiguo Fan

    (Department of Economic Management, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

  • Mengxue Liu

    (Lhasa Plateau Ecosystem Research Station, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Junchang Huang

    (College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Ling Li

    (College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

Abstract

A healthy rural ecosystem ensures a win–win situation for both economic growth and ecological conservation. However, the impact of land use changes at the rural level on ecosystem health remains unclear. This study focuses on the rural scale of Zheng–Bian–Luo, analyzing changes in land use from 2000 to 2020. Using the “Ecosystem Vigor-Organization-Resilience-Services” model, the study evaluates the spatiotemporal patterns of ecosystem health. The Patch-generating Land Use Simulation (PLUS) model was employed to simulate land use and ecosystem health in 2035 under three scenarios: Natural Development (ND), Ecological Protection (EP), and Cropland Protection (CP). The findings are as follows: (1) From 2000 to 2020, the area of cultivated land in Zheng–Bian–Luo rural areas decreased, and the area of forest land first decreased and then increased. (2) During the study period, ecosystem health improved as ecosystem vigor, organization, and services increased. Low-value areas of ecosystem health showed a shrinking trend, most notably in Kaifeng. (3) By 2035, under the EP scenario, forest land increased by 76.794 km 2 , while it decreased under the CP and ND scenarios. Construction land showed an increasing trend in all three scenarios, with the ND scenario seeing the largest increase of 718.007 km 2 . (4) In 2035, ecosystem health is projected to decline under the ND scenario due to reduced forest land and increased construction land. The CP scenario showed no significant change in ecosystem health, but the southwestern rural areas of Luoyang improved. The EP scenario saw an overall increase in ecosystem health, highlighting land use optimization as beneficial. Local governments are encouraged to create ecological protection plans balancing ecological and cultivated land protection, focusing on sensitive areas such as the Songshan region and southwestern mountainous areas of Luoyang for coordinated development.

Suggested Citation

  • Hejie Wei & Qing Han & Yu Ma & Wenfeng Ji & Weiguo Fan & Mengxue Liu & Junchang Huang & Ling Li, 2024. "Multi-Scenario Simulating the Effects of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Health for Rural Ecological Management in the Zheng–Bian–Luo Rural Area, Central China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-28, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1788-:d:1510299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1788/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1788/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yanhai Zhou & Jianwei Geng & Xingzhao Liu, 2024. "Urban Habitat Quality Enhancement and Optimization under Ecological Network Constraints," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Subhasis Das & Biswajeet Pradhan & Pravat Kumar Shit & Abdullah M. Alamri, 2020. "Assessment of Wetland Ecosystem Health Using the Pressure–State–Response (PSR) Model: A Case Study of Mursidabad District of West Bengal (India)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Dan Ye & Liu Yang & Min Zhou, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Variation in Ecosystem Health and Its Driving Factors in Guizhou Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Yuxia Xu & Qian Chen & Hui Zeng, 2024. "Rural Ecosystem Health Assessment and Spatial Divergence—A Case Study of Rural Areas around Qinling Mountain, Shaanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Qingxiang Meng & Likun Zhang & Hejie Wei & Enxiang Cai & Dong Xue & Mengxue Liu, 2021. "Linking Ecosystem Service Supply–Demand Risks and Regional Spatial Management in the Yihe River Basin, Central China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-27, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hong Ran & Yonggang Ma & Zhonglin Xu, 2022. "Evaluation and Prediction of Land Use Ecological Security in the Kashgar Region Based on Grid GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Xinsheng Zhu & Yongfeng Yang & Jun Yuan & Ziru Niu, 2023. "Evaluation of the Ecological Status of Wetlands of International Importance in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Zhihong Yao & Zhuangzhuang Liu & Junshan Lei & Dun Zhu & Haiyan Jia & Muchen Jiang & Chunming Li & Zhilong Xie & Chongchong Peng & Yiwen Zhang, 2022. "Identification and Evaluation of Water Pollution Risk in the Chongqing Section of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Jingwei Wang & Jinhe Zhang & Peijia Wang & Xiaobin Ma & Liangjian Yang & Leying Zhou, 2022. "Progress in Ecosystem Health Research and Future Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Ning Zhang & Kangning Xiong & Hua Xiao & Juan Zhang & Chuhong Shen, 2023. "Ecological Environment Dynamic Monitoring and Driving Force Analysis of Karst World Heritage Sites Based on Remote-Sensing: A Case Study of Shibing Karst," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Hang Shu & Chunwang Xiao & Ting Ma & Weiguo Sang, 2021. "Ecological Health Assessment of Chinese National Parks Based on Landscape Pattern: A Case Study in Shennongjia National Park," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Liang Geng & Xinyue Zhao & Yu An & Lingtong Peng & Dan Ye, 2022. "Study on the Spatial Interaction between Urban Economic and Ecological Environment—A Case Study of Wuhan City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Kaili Zhang & Rongrong Feng & Zhicheng Zhang & Chun Deng & Hongjuan Zhang & Kang Liu, 2022. "Exploring the Driving Factors of Remote Sensing Ecological Index Changes from the Perspective of Geospatial Differentiation: A Case Study of the Weihe River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-25, September.
    9. Xiaojie Wang & Rongqing Han & Minghua Zhao, 2023. "Evaluation and Impact Mechanism of High-Quality Development in China’s Coastal Provinces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-24, January.
    10. Xiao Zhang & Jun Wang & Mingyue Zhao & Yan Gao & Yanxu Liu, 2023. "Variations of Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand on the Southeast Hilly Area of China: Implications for Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, March.
    11. Tianlong Liu & Xiang Ji & Yaxi Gong, 2022. "Wetland Functional Area Division Method: A Correlation Analysis of Water Quality and Landscape Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-26, October.
    12. Xi Lu & Jiaqing Lu & Xinzheng Yang & Xumei Chen, 2022. "Assessment of Urban Mobility via a Pressure-State-Response (PSR) Model with the IVIF-AHP and FCE Methods: A Case Study of Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, March.
    13. Tonghui Yu & Xuan Huang & Shanshan Jia & Xufeng Cui, 2023. "Unveiling the Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Key Drivers for Urban Green High-Quality Development: A Comparative Analysis of China’s Five Major Urban Agglomerations," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, October.
    14. Xin Xu & Cheng-Cai Yang & Yang Xiao & Jian-Lei Kong, 2023. "A Fine-Grained Recognition Neural Network with High-Order Feature Maps via Graph-Based Embedding for Natural Bird Diversity Conservation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Wenjun Liu & Xiangyi Ma & Qian Sun & Wei Qi & Xinyang Yu, 2024. "Quantification and Flow Simulation of Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand in the Yellow River Delta High-Efficiency Eco-Economic Zone," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, October.
    16. Ziming Song & Yingyue Sun & Peng Chen & Mingming Jia, 2022. "Assessing the Ecosystem Health of Coastal Wetland Vegetation ( Suaeda salsa ) Using the Pressure State Response Model, a Case of the Liao River Estuary in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-14, January.
    17. Meili Tang & Jia’ni Ding & Haojia Kong & Brandon J. Bethel & Decai Tang, 2022. "Influence of Green Finance on Ecological Environment Quality in Yangtze River Delta," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1788-:d:1510299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.