IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6323-d1441659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rural Ecosystem Health Assessment and Spatial Divergence—A Case Study of Rural Areas around Qinling Mountain, Shaanxi Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yuxia Xu

    (Key Laboratory of Disaster Monitoring and Mechanism Simulating of Shaanxi Province, Baoji University of Arts and Science, Baoji 721013, China
    School of Geography & Environment, Baoji University of Arts and Sciences, Baoji 721013, China)

  • Qian Chen

    (School of Geography & Environment, Baoji University of Arts and Sciences, Baoji 721013, China)

  • Hui Zeng

    (School of Geography & Environment, Baoji University of Arts and Sciences, Baoji 721013, China)

Abstract

The rapid progress of urbanization and rural revitalization in developing countries has led to dramatic changes to the rural ecological environment. Assessing the rural ecosystem health (REH) is a crucial foundation for promoting sustainable development in rural areas. This study, focusing on rural areas around the Qinling Mountains in Shaanxi Province, establishes an evaluation system based on appropriate evaluation indicators for assessing the composite ecosystem. This evaluation system comprises four rural ecosystem subsystems: resource, environment, society, and economy. By employing a comprehensive indicator evaluation model and remote sensing image data, this study examines the health status of rural ecosystems in the 40 counties and districts across the study area, as well as their spatial differentiation characteristics, using ArcGIS (10.8) spatial analysis. The REH scores of these areas range from 0.6856 to 0.8818, with a fluctuating downward trend from north to south. This suggests that the rural ecosystems around the Qinling Mountains in Shaanxi Province are relatively healthy, with the northern area being notably healthier than the southern area. Spatial Gini coefficient analysis reveals a much smaller coefficient for the overall ecosystem compared to the subsystems in the study area, indicating that the distribution of health levels is dispersed and not concentrated. After establishing REH grades and quantity metrics, the 40 counties and districts are categorized into 13 types, followed by an analysis of the influencing factors for each type. Recommendations and management strategies are then proposed to enhance the health of rural ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuxia Xu & Qian Chen & Hui Zeng, 2024. "Rural Ecosystem Health Assessment and Spatial Divergence—A Case Study of Rural Areas around Qinling Mountain, Shaanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6323-:d:1441659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6323/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6323/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Run Zhao & Chaofeng Shao & Rong He, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecosystem Health of China’s Provinces Based on SDGs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chenxi Li & Zhihong Zong & Haichao Qie & Yingying Fang & Qiao Liu, 2023. "CiteSpace and Bibliometric Analysis of Published Research on Forest Ecosystem Services for the Period 2018–2022," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Chun Yang & Shaohua Tan & Hantao Zhou & Wei Zeng, 2024. "Towards Sustainable Rural Development: Assessment Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Rural Ecosystem Health through Integrating Ecosystem Integrity and SDGs," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6323-:d:1441659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.