IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3701-d1071534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Ecological Status of Wetlands of International Importance in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xinsheng Zhu

    (Academy of Inventory and Planning, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100013, China)

  • Yongfeng Yang

    (Academy of Inventory and Planning, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100013, China)

  • Jun Yuan

    (Academy of Inventory and Planning, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100013, China)

  • Ziru Niu

    (Shanxi Provincial Land Engineering Construction Group Co., Ltd., Xian 710075, China
    Institute of Land Engineering and Technology, Shanxi Provincial Land Engineering Construction Group Co., Ltd., Xian 710075, China)

Abstract

An international assessment of wetlands is important for quantifying the current state of development of international wetland structure and function. At present, the management department and public lack a comprehensive understanding of the ecological status of internationally important wetlands in China. Here, using annual ecological monitoring data and hierarchical analysis, an evaluation index system was constructed with water environment, biological environment, biodiversity, and disturbance pressure as influencing factors, and an evaluation of the ecological status of 63 wetlands of international importance (WOII) in China was carried out, it is helpful to formulate technical plans for the ecological management of wetlands of international importance (WOII). The results showed that the average ecological status score of these wetlands was 0.714 ± 0.075, and there were differences in this score between different regions. The ecological status of wetlands in northeastern and northern coastal areas were mostly evaluated as ‘excellent’ and ‘good’, while some wetlands in other areas of China were evaluated as ‘poor’. The type and protection level of wetlands have an important impact on their ecological status. The ecological status of wetlands according to type were ranked swamp wetlands > coastal wetlands > river wetlands > lake wetlands, while those with national level protection were ranked higher than those with provincial level protection. The ecological status of WOII in China is generally good, but is adversely affected by human activities, alien species invasion, and other factors. Hence, there needs to be a focus on improving the protection and management mechanisms for WOII, promoting improvements in the ecological status of these wetlands, and transforming ecological product value.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinsheng Zhu & Yongfeng Yang & Jun Yuan & Ziru Niu, 2023. "Evaluation of the Ecological Status of Wetlands of International Importance in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3701-:d:1071534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3701/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3701/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Subhasis Das & Biswajeet Pradhan & Pravat Kumar Shit & Abdullah M. Alamri, 2020. "Assessment of Wetland Ecosystem Health Using the Pressure–State–Response (PSR) Model: A Case Study of Mursidabad District of West Bengal (India)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Roghayeh Sadeghi Pasvisheh & Marie Anne Eurie Forio & Long Tuan Ho & Peter L. M. Goethals, 2021. "Evidence-Based Management of the Anzali Wetland System (Northern Iran) Based on Innovative Monitoring and Modeling Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Ting Xu & Baisha Weng & Denghua Yan & Kun Wang & Xiangnan Li & Wuxia Bi & Meng Li & Xiangjun Cheng & Yinxue Liu, 2019. "Wetlands of International Importance: Status, Threats, and Future Protection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hong Ran & Yonggang Ma & Zhonglin Xu, 2022. "Evaluation and Prediction of Land Use Ecological Security in the Kashgar Region Based on Grid GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Zhihong Yao & Zhuangzhuang Liu & Junshan Lei & Dun Zhu & Haiyan Jia & Muchen Jiang & Chunming Li & Zhilong Xie & Chongchong Peng & Yiwen Zhang, 2022. "Identification and Evaluation of Water Pollution Risk in the Chongqing Section of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Jingwei Wang & Jinhe Zhang & Peijia Wang & Xiaobin Ma & Liangjian Yang & Leying Zhou, 2022. "Progress in Ecosystem Health Research and Future Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Ning Zhang & Kangning Xiong & Hua Xiao & Juan Zhang & Chuhong Shen, 2023. "Ecological Environment Dynamic Monitoring and Driving Force Analysis of Karst World Heritage Sites Based on Remote-Sensing: A Case Study of Shibing Karst," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Hang Shu & Chunwang Xiao & Ting Ma & Weiguo Sang, 2021. "Ecological Health Assessment of Chinese National Parks Based on Landscape Pattern: A Case Study in Shennongjia National Park," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Liang Geng & Xinyue Zhao & Yu An & Lingtong Peng & Dan Ye, 2022. "Study on the Spatial Interaction between Urban Economic and Ecological Environment—A Case Study of Wuhan City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Kaili Zhang & Rongrong Feng & Zhicheng Zhang & Chun Deng & Hongjuan Zhang & Kang Liu, 2022. "Exploring the Driving Factors of Remote Sensing Ecological Index Changes from the Perspective of Geospatial Differentiation: A Case Study of the Weihe River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Xiaojie Wang & Rongqing Han & Minghua Zhao, 2023. "Evaluation and Impact Mechanism of High-Quality Development in China’s Coastal Provinces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-24, January.
    9. Tianlong Liu & Xiang Ji & Yaxi Gong, 2022. "Wetland Functional Area Division Method: A Correlation Analysis of Water Quality and Landscape Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-26, October.
    10. Xi Lu & Jiaqing Lu & Xinzheng Yang & Xumei Chen, 2022. "Assessment of Urban Mobility via a Pressure-State-Response (PSR) Model with the IVIF-AHP and FCE Methods: A Case Study of Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, March.
    11. Zhaobin Li & Lei Ma & Dongmei Gou & Qianqian Hong & Leungkam Fai & Bo Xiong, 2022. "The Impact of Urban Development on Wetland Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Hejie Wei & Qing Han & Yu Ma & Wenfeng Ji & Weiguo Fan & Mengxue Liu & Junchang Huang & Ling Li, 2024. "Multi-Scenario Simulating the Effects of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Health for Rural Ecological Management in the Zheng–Bian–Luo Rural Area, Central China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-28, October.
    13. Xin Xu & Cheng-Cai Yang & Yang Xiao & Jian-Lei Kong, 2023. "A Fine-Grained Recognition Neural Network with High-Order Feature Maps via Graph-Based Embedding for Natural Bird Diversity Conservation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Adeyemi O. Adeeyo & Stanley S. Ndlovu & Linda M. Ngwagwe & Mulalo Mudau & Mercy A. Alabi & Joshua N. Edokpayi, 2022. "Wetland Resources in South Africa: Threats and Metadata Study," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Ziming Song & Yingyue Sun & Peng Chen & Mingming Jia, 2022. "Assessing the Ecosystem Health of Coastal Wetland Vegetation ( Suaeda salsa ) Using the Pressure State Response Model, a Case of the Liao River Estuary in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-14, January.
    16. Meili Tang & Jia’ni Ding & Haojia Kong & Brandon J. Bethel & Decai Tang, 2022. "Influence of Green Finance on Ecological Environment Quality in Yangtze River Delta," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3701-:d:1071534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.