IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p6245-d820385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification and Evaluation of Water Pollution Risk in the Chongqing Section of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhihong Yao

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Zhuangzhuang Liu

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Junshan Lei

    (Changjiang Water Resources Protection Institute, Wuhan 430051, China)

  • Dun Zhu

    (Changjiang Water Resources Protection Institute, Wuhan 430051, China)

  • Haiyan Jia

    (Changjiang Water Resources Protection Institute, Wuhan 430051, China)

  • Muchen Jiang

    (The River and Lake Protection Center of the Ministry of Water Resources, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Chunming Li

    (The River and Lake Protection Center of the Ministry of Water Resources, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Zhilong Xie

    (The River and Lake Protection Center of the Ministry of Water Resources, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Chongchong Peng

    (The River and Lake Protection Center of the Ministry of Water Resources, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Yiwen Zhang

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

Abstract

The Three Gorges Reservoir is the largest freshwater resource reservoir in China. The water environment security in the Three Gorges Reservoir area has a prominent position in the major national strategy for the protection of the Yangtze River. Based on the pressure–state–response (PSR) model, this study comprehensively considers the dangerousness of risk source, the sensitivity of risk receptors, and the acceptable level of regional environmental risk to construct the grading evaluation index system of water environment pollution risk. By using spatial statistical methods, including the variation coefficient method and cold–hot spot pattern analysis, the risk distribution of water environment pollution in the Chongqing section of the Three Gorges Reservoir area was comprehensively identified and evaluated by administrative units. The results showed that: (1) the number of risk sources was largest in Yunyang County and the number of risk receptors was largest in Wanzhou District. However, the distribution of high-risk pollution sources and high-sensitivity receptors was most intensive in the main urban area and surrounding areas of Chongqing, and the regional environmental risk acceptance level was the lowest. (2) The statistical results of risk source dangerousness and the risk receptor sensitivity index at the county level in the study area showed an aggregated distribution pattern, with hotspot areas concentrated in the main urban area of Chongqing and the surrounding area in the upper reaches of the reservoir area. Moreover, the acceptable level of risk in this area showed a cold spot area, while other regions basically showed a balanced distribution pattern without forming significant hot spot or cold spot areas. (3) The high-risk river section of water pollution in the reservoir area comprised five counties, including Jiulongpo District, Yubei District, Shapingba District, Yuzhong District and Nanan District; the middle-risk river section comprised six counties, including Changshou District, Beipei District, Jiangbei District, Dadukou District, Fuling District and Shizhu County; and the low-risk river sections were mainly distributed in the Jiangjin District in the upper reaches of the reservoir area and the middle and lower reaches of the northeast ecological area of Chongqing. Therefore, the acceptable levels of water pollution risk sources, receptors and regional environmental risks in the Chongqing section of the Three Gorges Reservoir area are unevenly distributed, showing an aggregated distribution pattern. The spatial distribution of water environment pollution risk is uneven, and the significant potential risk area is the functional core area of Chongqing, which is the critical area of water environment risk management in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhihong Yao & Zhuangzhuang Liu & Junshan Lei & Dun Zhu & Haiyan Jia & Muchen Jiang & Chunming Li & Zhilong Xie & Chongchong Peng & Yiwen Zhang, 2022. "Identification and Evaluation of Water Pollution Risk in the Chongqing Section of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6245-:d:820385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6245/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6245/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Subhasis Das & Biswajeet Pradhan & Pravat Kumar Shit & Abdullah M. Alamri, 2020. "Assessment of Wetland Ecosystem Health Using the Pressure–State–Response (PSR) Model: A Case Study of Mursidabad District of West Bengal (India)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hong Ran & Yonggang Ma & Zhonglin Xu, 2022. "Evaluation and Prediction of Land Use Ecological Security in the Kashgar Region Based on Grid GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Xinsheng Zhu & Yongfeng Yang & Jun Yuan & Ziru Niu, 2023. "Evaluation of the Ecological Status of Wetlands of International Importance in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Jingwei Wang & Jinhe Zhang & Peijia Wang & Xiaobin Ma & Liangjian Yang & Leying Zhou, 2022. "Progress in Ecosystem Health Research and Future Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Ning Zhang & Kangning Xiong & Hua Xiao & Juan Zhang & Chuhong Shen, 2023. "Ecological Environment Dynamic Monitoring and Driving Force Analysis of Karst World Heritage Sites Based on Remote-Sensing: A Case Study of Shibing Karst," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Hang Shu & Chunwang Xiao & Ting Ma & Weiguo Sang, 2021. "Ecological Health Assessment of Chinese National Parks Based on Landscape Pattern: A Case Study in Shennongjia National Park," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Liang Geng & Xinyue Zhao & Yu An & Lingtong Peng & Dan Ye, 2022. "Study on the Spatial Interaction between Urban Economic and Ecological Environment—A Case Study of Wuhan City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Kaili Zhang & Rongrong Feng & Zhicheng Zhang & Chun Deng & Hongjuan Zhang & Kang Liu, 2022. "Exploring the Driving Factors of Remote Sensing Ecological Index Changes from the Perspective of Geospatial Differentiation: A Case Study of the Weihe River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Xiaojie Wang & Rongqing Han & Minghua Zhao, 2023. "Evaluation and Impact Mechanism of High-Quality Development in China’s Coastal Provinces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-24, January.
    9. Tianlong Liu & Xiang Ji & Yaxi Gong, 2022. "Wetland Functional Area Division Method: A Correlation Analysis of Water Quality and Landscape Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-26, October.
    10. Xi Lu & Jiaqing Lu & Xinzheng Yang & Xumei Chen, 2022. "Assessment of Urban Mobility via a Pressure-State-Response (PSR) Model with the IVIF-AHP and FCE Methods: A Case Study of Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, March.
    11. Hejie Wei & Qing Han & Yu Ma & Wenfeng Ji & Weiguo Fan & Mengxue Liu & Junchang Huang & Ling Li, 2024. "Multi-Scenario Simulating the Effects of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Health for Rural Ecological Management in the Zheng–Bian–Luo Rural Area, Central China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-28, October.
    12. Xin Xu & Cheng-Cai Yang & Yang Xiao & Jian-Lei Kong, 2023. "A Fine-Grained Recognition Neural Network with High-Order Feature Maps via Graph-Based Embedding for Natural Bird Diversity Conservation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Ziming Song & Yingyue Sun & Peng Chen & Mingming Jia, 2022. "Assessing the Ecosystem Health of Coastal Wetland Vegetation ( Suaeda salsa ) Using the Pressure State Response Model, a Case of the Liao River Estuary in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-14, January.
    14. Meili Tang & Jia’ni Ding & Haojia Kong & Brandon J. Bethel & Decai Tang, 2022. "Influence of Green Finance on Ecological Environment Quality in Yangtze River Delta," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6245-:d:820385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.