IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i4p858-d1120358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landscapes of the Yazd-Ardakan Plain (Iran) and the Assessment of Geotourism—Contribution to the Promotion and Practice of Geotourism and Ecotourism

Author

Listed:
  • Iulian Dincă

    (Department of Geography, Tourism and Territorial Planning, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania)

  • Seyede Razieh Keshavarz

    (Geography Department, Islamic Azad University, Yazd Branch, Yazd 89168 71967, Iran)

  • Seyed Ali Almodaresi

    (GIS & RS Department, Islamic Azad University, Yazd Branch, Yazd 89168 71967, Iran)

Abstract

The attractions and capabilities of geomorphosites are among the unique assets of each country, and their identification, classification, and planning have great importance for the development of tourism. The purpose of this research was to identify, quantitatively analyse, and classify landforms treated as geosites and landscapes of Yazd Province, using the Pralong method. The present study is a descriptive analytical research based on library studies and field surveys. After determining the study area using satellite imagery, six geomorphosites were selected. Using the Pralong method, six geomorphosites were evaluated: Chak Chak, Mountain Eagle, Siahkooh, Shirkooh, Qanat, and Barfkhane Tezerjan. In this method, using the extraction of collected data from the questionnaires completed by 41 geotourism experts in the first stage, the four grades that were evaluated in terms of potential capability of geomorphosites include the appearance aesthetic, scientific, historical-cultural, and socio-economic variables, and in the next step, two variables of productivity value and quality of productivity were evaluated. The results of evaluations showed that the geomorphosites Chak Chak and Barfkhane Tezerjan had the highest score (0.62) and are the best geomorphosites for converting to geotourism and ecotourism applications, and they have high potential for attracting tourists. The second place was dedicated to the Shirkooh geomorphosite, which is considerable in terms of the average tourism grade. The best average productivity value belonged to the Chak Chak geomorphosite with 0.52, and the last one was Mountain Eagle with 0.32. All six attractions in this study had a medium grade in the qualitative scale index, meaning that they have good potential in geotouristic and ecotouristic points of view and could be improved by regional planning. Therefore, the results of this study can be used by local managers and planners to develop and promote geotourism and ecotourism.

Suggested Citation

  • Iulian Dincă & Seyede Razieh Keshavarz & Seyed Ali Almodaresi, 2023. "Landscapes of the Yazd-Ardakan Plain (Iran) and the Assessment of Geotourism—Contribution to the Promotion and Practice of Geotourism and Ecotourism," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:858-:d:1120358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/858/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/858/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julian Stolz & Heidi Elisabeth Megerle, 2022. "Geotrails as a Medium for Education and Geotourism: Recommendations for Quality Improvement Based on the Results of a Research Project in the Swabian Alb UNESCO Global Geopark," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-37, August.
    2. Lucia Contillo & Marina Zingaro & Domenico Capolongo & Giuseppe Corrado & Marcello Schiattarella, 2022. "Geomorphology and geotourism for a sustainable development of the Daunia Mts, Southern Italy," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 418-427, December.
    3. Irina-Maria Neches & George Erdeli, 2015. "Geolandscapes and Geotourism: Integrating Nature and Culture in the Bucegi Mountains of Romania," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 486-509, May.
    4. Iván Franch-Pardo & Brian M. Napoletano & Gerardo Bocco & Sara Barrasa & Luis Cancer-Pomar, 2017. "The Role of Geographical Landscape Studies for Sustainable Territorial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Rasa Raeisi & Iulian Dincă & Seyed Ali Almodaresi & Magdalena Petronella (Nellie) Swart & Ali Boloor, 2022. "An Assessment of Geosites and Geomorphosites in the Lut Desert of Shahdad Region for Potential Geotourism Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    6. Zhe Wang & Lawal Marafa, 2021. "Tourism Imaginary and Landscape at Heritage Site: A Case in Honghe Hani Rice Terraces, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Yun Eui Choi & Minsun Doh & Samuel Park & Jinhyung Chon, 2017. "Transformation Planning of Ecotourism Systems to Invigorate Responsible Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna V. Mikhailenko & Svetlana O. Zorina & Natalia N. Yashalova & Dmitry A. Ruban, 2023. "Promoting Geosites on Web-Pages: An Assessment of the Quality and Quantity of Information in Real Cases," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Esperanza Fernández-Martínez & Ismael Coronado & Luna Adrados & Rodrigo Castaño, 2022. "Factors in the Responsible Management of the Luna Valley Complex Geosite (NW Spain)—A Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-31, November.
    2. Maria Anna Bertolino & Federica Corrado, 2021. "Rethinking Terraces and Dry-Stone Walls in the Alps for Sustainable Development: The Case of Mombarone/Alto Eporediese in Piedmont Region (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Yitian Ren, 2023. "Rural China Staggering towards the Digital Era: Evolution and Restructuring," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, July.
    4. Pietro Marescotti & Giulia Castello & Antonino Briguglio & Maria Cristina Caprioglio & Laura Crispini & Marco Firpo, 2022. "Geosite Assessment in the Beigua UNESCO Global Geopark (Liguria, Italy): A Case Study in Linking Geoheritage with Education, Tourism, and Community Involvement," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Diana E. Dumitras & Valentin C. Mihai & Ionel M. Jitea & Delia Donici & Iulia C. Muresan, 2021. "Adventure Tourism: Insight from Experienced Visitors of Romanian National and Natural Parks," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Cloe X. Pérez-Valladares & Ana I. Moreno-Calles & Alejandro Casas & Selene Rangel-Landa & José Blancas & Javier Caballero & Alejandro Velazquez, 2020. "Ecological, Cultural, and Geographical Implications of Brahea dulcis (Kunth) Mart. Insights for Sustainable Management in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Deqiang Cheng & Chunliu Gao, 2022. "Regionalization Research of Mountain-Hazards Developing Environments for the Eurasian Continent," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Shirley Thompson & Stewart Hill & Annette Salles & Tanzim Ahmed & Ajarat Adegun & Uche Nwankwo, 2023. "The Northern Corridor, Food Insecurity and the Resource Curse for Indigenous Communities in Canada," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 16(20), June.
    9. Theano S. Terkenli, 2021. "Research Advances in Tourism-Landscape Interrelations: An Editorial," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-8, September.
    10. Federico Pasquaré Mariotto & Kyriaki Drymoni & Fabio L. Bonali & Alessandro Tibaldi & Noemi Corti & Paolo Oppizzi, 2023. "Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Brian M. Napoletano & Brett Clark & John Bellamy Foster & Pedro S. Urquijo, 2020. "Sustainability and Metabolic Revolution in the Works of Henri Lefebvre," World, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Daminda Sumanapala & Isabelle D. Wolf, 2022. "Introducing Geotourism to Diversify the Visitor Experience in Protected Areas and Reduce Impacts on Overused Attractions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Xiaoxu Liang & Naisi Hua & John Martin & Elena Dellapiana & Cristina Coscia & Yu Zhang, 2022. "Social Media as a Medium to Promote Local Perception Expression in China’s World Heritage Sites," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Maria Górska-Zabielska, 2023. "A New Geosite as a Contribution to the Sustainable Development of Urban Geotourism in a Tourist Peripheral Region—Central Poland," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, June.
    15. Daeyoung Jeong & Yun Eui Choi & Lilan Jin & Jinhyung Chon, 2019. "Impact of Spatial Change on Tourism by Bridge Connections between Islands: A Case Study of Ganghwa County in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-17, November.
    16. Alexis Mooser & Giorgio Anfuso & Carlos Mestanza & Allan Thomas Williams, 2018. "Management Implications for the Most Attractive Scenic Sites along the Andalusia Coast (SW Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-26, April.
    17. Ľubica Ilkovičová & Ján Ilkovič, 2022. "Mining Educational Trail in Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, June.
    18. Ahyoung Yoon & Daeyoung Jeong & Jinhyung Chon & Ji-Hwan Yoon, 2019. "A Study of Consumers’ Intentions to Participate in Responsible Tourism Using Message Framing and Appeals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, February.
    19. Tatjana Tambovceva & Dzintra Atstaja & Maria Tereshina & Inga Uvarova & Agita Livina, 2020. "Sustainability Challenges and Drivers of Cross-Border Greenway Tourism in Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-26, July.
    20. Álvaro Dias & Inês Aldana & Leandro Pereira & Renato Lopes da Costa & Nelson António, 2021. "A Measure of Tourist Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:858-:d:1120358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.