IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i8p815-d607226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Young Farmers’ Perceptions of Sustainability in a Wine Region in Hungary

Author

Listed:
  • Adrienne Csizmady

    (Institute of Sociology, Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, 1097 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Bernadett Csurgó

    (Institute of Sociology, Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, 1097 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Szabina Kerényi

    (Institute of Sociology, Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, 1097 Budapest, Hungary)

  • András Balázs

    (Institute of Sociology, Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, 1097 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Veronika Kocsis

    (Institute of Sociology, Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, 1097 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Botond Palaczki

    (Institute of Sociology, Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, 1097 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

Emerging evidence has shown that a sustainable mode of farming contributes to the sustainability of societies. However, agricultural modernization and land concentration have resulted in a decreasing role of agriculture in rural societies everywhere in Europe and also in Hungary. Governmental funds and agendas increasingly focus on the regeneration of rural areas with a special interest in the new generations of farmers. This paper analyses a small wine region in Hungary to explore the perceptions and activities of young farmers regarding sustainability. The paper is based on qualitative sociological research, including 20 semi-structured interviews with wine producers and other key actors of rural development in the region. The analysis focuses on generational change both in wine producer farms and in the wine region. How do farmers approach sustainability, and how does the concept of sustainability contribute to family wine production? How can generational change affect farming approaches and activities, especially changes toward a more sustainable way of farming? Our results show that rural regeneration can be understood not only as a generational renewal; it also includes endogenous development processes and new approaches targeting a more sustainable rural milieu.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrienne Csizmady & Bernadett Csurgó & Szabina Kerényi & András Balázs & Veronika Kocsis & Botond Palaczki, 2021. "Young Farmers’ Perceptions of Sustainability in a Wine Region in Hungary," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:8:p:815-:d:607226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/8/815/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/8/815/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colleen C. Myles & Trina R. Filan, 2019. "Making (a) place: wine, society and environment in California's Sierra Nevada foothills," Regional Studies, Regional Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 157-167, January.
    2. Luca Simone Rizzo & Filippo Smerghetto & Maria Giuseppina Lucia & Raffaela Gabriella Rizzo, 2017. "Sprawl Dynamics in Rural–Urban Territories Highly Suited for Wine Production. Mapping Urban Growth and Changing Territorial Shapes in North-East Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Conway, Shane Francis & McDonagh, John & Farrell, Maura & Kinsella, Anne, 2018. "Till death do us part: Exploring the Irish farmer-farm relationship in later life through the lens of ‘Insideness'," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 7(1), July.
    4. George Vlahos, 2020. "Farming System Transformation Impacts on Landscape: A Case Study on Quality Wine Production in a Highly Contested Agricultural Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Cristina Chaminade & Filippo Randelli, 2020. "The Role of Territorially Embedded Innovation Ecosystems Accelerating Sustainability Transformations: A Case Study of the Transformation to Organic Wine Production in Tuscany (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Cristina Santini & Alessio Cavicchi & Leonardo Casini, 2013. "Sustainability in the wine industry: key questions and research trends a," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 1(1), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Florian Ahlmeyer & Kati Volgmann, 2023. "What Can We Expect for the Development of Rural Areas in Europe?—Trends of the Last Decade and Their Opportunities for Rural Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Szabolcs Bérczi & Zita Szabó & Ágnes Sallay, 2022. "Strategic Directions: Evaluation of Village Development Strategies in the Case of Applicants for the Hungarian Village Renewal Award," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Douglas K. Bardsley & Annette M. Bardsley & Marco Conedera, 2023. "The dispersion of climate change impacts from viticulture in Ticino, Switzerland," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Colleen C. Myles & Christi G. Townsend & Kourtney Collins, 2022. "Texas in Transition: Considering the Production of Grapes, Wine, and Place," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Chloe M. E. Fletcher & Louise Stewart & Kate M. Gunn, 2023. "Stressors, Barriers and Facilitators Faced by Australian Farmers When Transitioning to Retirement: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Marc Dressler, 2023. "Generic strategic profiling of entrepreneurial SMEs – environmentalism as hygiene factor," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 121-150, March.
    5. Chiara Aleffi & Sabrina Tomasi & Concetta Ferrara & Cristina Santini & Gigliola Paviotti & Federica Baldoni & Alessio Cavicchi, 2020. "Universities and Wineries: Supporting Sustainable Development in Disadvantaged Rural Areas," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    7. Rossella Canestrino & Pierpaolo Magliocca & Antonio Guarino, 2016. "Environmental sustainability and organic wine production: evidences from italian industry," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 83-111.
    8. George Vlahos, 2020. "Farming System Transformation Impacts on Landscape: A Case Study on Quality Wine Production in a Highly Contested Agricultural Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Leonel J. R. Nunes & Abel M. Rodrigues & João C. O. Matias & Ana I. Ferraz & Ana C. Rodrigues, 2021. "Production of Biochar from Vine Pruning: Waste Recovery in the Wine Industry," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Félix Calle & Ángela González-Moreno & Inmaculada Carrasco & Manuel Vargas-Vargas, 2020. "Social Economy, Environmental Proactivity, Eco-Innovation and Performance in the Spanish Wine Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-26, July.
    11. Yanzhang Gu & Longying Hu & Hongjin Zhang & Chenxuan Hou, 2021. "Innovation Ecosystem Research: Emerging Trends and Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    12. Cassar Silvana & Creaco Salvo, 2016. "Towards Tourism Sustainability: General Aspects and Empirical Evidence of the Italian Experience at Decentralized Level, with Specific Reference to Sicily," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 95-138, February.
    13. Katharina Spraul & Annegret Höfert, 2021. "Governance for Sustainability: Patterns of Regulation and Self-Regulation in the German Wine Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    14. Eugenio Pomarici & Riccardo Vecchio & Angela Mariani, 2015. "Wineries’ Perception of Sustainability Costs and Benefits: An Exploratory Study in California," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Lisa Pizzol & Gloria Luzzani & Paolo Criscione & Luca Barro & Carlo Bagnoli & Ettore Capri, 2021. "The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Wine Industry: The Case Study of Veneto and Friuli Venezia Giulia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-15, November.
    16. Basso, Matteo & Vettoretto, Luciano, 2020. "Reversal sprawl. Land-use regulation, society and institutions in Proseccotown," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    17. Alessandro Passaro & Filippo Randelli, 2022. "Spaces of Governance for Sustainable Transformation of Local Food Systems: the Case of 8 biodistricts in Tuscany," Working Papers - Economics wp2022_12.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    18. Marc Dressler & Ivan Paunovic, 2021. "A Typology of Winery SME Brand Strategies with Implications for Sustainability Communication and Co-Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Francesco Gerli & Veronica Chiodo & Irene Bengo, 2020. "Technology Transfer for Social Entrepreneurship: Designing Problem-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Gianluigi Gallenti & Stefania Troiano & Francesco Marangon & Paolo Bogoni & Barbara Campisi & Marta Cosmina, 2019. "Environmentally sustainable versus aesthetic values motivating millennials’ preferences for wine purchasing: evidence from an experimental analysis in Italy," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:8:p:815-:d:607226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.